Jahled: At last, no more 'where's the K3 review?' comments boring us witless
At last, no more 'where's the K3 review?' comments boring us witless
I'm genuinely scratching my head as to the point of such a small body that will need an external recorder if their Quad HD or Ultra HD is one of the selling points.. am I missing something?
SergioMO: Please tell to ALL your friend ... -We dont´t want a World Cup In Brasil !!!! We need education, hospitals , etc.
They aren't exactly going to sell this camera, those examples are they?
Marty4650: This would be the perfect time for Dpreview to create a "reboxing video" for the Nikon D600.
Brilliantine Stick Inesct: Nikon and Canon are rapidly becoming dinosaurs. Mirrorless cameras will kill their business model. The mirror less efforts from both these guys have been poor. Olympus and Fuji are showing the way.
Chris Noble: Interesting, but not very useful. I'd prefer to see a comparative unboxing vs. Canon.
Me to, it would be the sort of zenith of comments stupidity wouldn't it? People bickering over which brand unboxes best
"According to Forbes, one buyer was even willing to pay $1,000 for any photo with more than 1,000 likes."
Was the buyer unsure whether the photograph was worth it or something?
Zoofy: Elitism attracts the stupid..
Haha! It certainly does :)
DotCom Editor: No money for the photographer. So, Canon, Nikon and all the others will now be lowering prices on camera gear?
Why would they do that?
MediaDigitalVideo: D4s and NO 4K recording ?
Unlike Canon, Nikon haven't spent the last few years releasing dedicated video lenses, and given this isn't a Mickey mouse camera, what's the point of adding 4K to it?
topstuff: I'm sure someone will be along in a moment comparing it to an Olympus EM-1.
It seems every camera is compared to an EM-1 these days.
Whatever the question, some people think the answer is m4/3.
Of course they will, it wouldn't be DP Review comments without a mindless dialogue of passionate argument concerning technological detail
Ho ho, KR got this one a bit wrong didn't he!
Just thought I would check out some camera moaning before I took the dog out for a walk
I love these :)
Hahahahaahah! "The Df is rather pretty"
Looks fun :)
Pat Cullinan Jr: It was staged. Even the New York Times revealed this. Read http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/18/arts/design/18capa.html?ref=arts, if you dare.
We'll take your word for it then.
Lan: The obvious question is: Why?
Is this going to be optically better than the other cine lenses already on sale? Very unlikely.
Much better built? No.
Is it much cheaper than the other cine lenses? Clearly not.
Will it have a bigger ecosystem of lenses with matched "feel"? Again, that's almost undoubtedly a "no".
What advantages does this bring to the market? Is there even one thing that's significantly better than the competition? If they do have something, they need to inform marketing about it - because I'm not seeing it!
This looks very much like a hopelessly late, desperate leap to jump onto a really shiny bandwagon that was last seen rolling past a few months ago...
I'd wait for these in the sales bin. Along with the battered remnants of Kenko/Tokina in due course...
I was wondering exactly this, especially when I saw the probable retail price.