I would not leave any anti-Nikon comment here. Those 6 execs look tough - like OG tough. I bet they could order a quick hit on any one of us.
Take off the filter, bang your camera around and live a little!
Would love to see a comparison vs iPhone/S5(6).
HubertChen: Compliments to great writing on "First Impressions" and "Shooting Experience". For me every camera is technically good enough, but handling of most cameras clearly is not. Thus (for me) these pages are the most important pages in any review. Keep up the good work.
Personally I would even enjoy more pages about handling and less pages about Image Quality and technical details. I did not even looked at the IQ pages. Again, all cameras good enough for me. I am shopping for a camera with better handling, not with better IQ.
this + a drone = pure voyeuristic win!
cainn24: I hate it. I don't care if it's irrational, or if six thousand million other people love it, I hate it. I feel that the encroachment of all this social media friendly nonsense somehow spells the beginning of the end of the unadulterated enthusiast camera tradition, and that bothers me deeply.
Thanks Horton the elephant.
No smartphone category? You're ignoring the largest market segment!
These shooting experience / first impression sections in your reviews are great. I find them most useful and enjoyable to read. Feel free to expand these sections.
PPierre: I think the 7th one is amazingly well thought: good atmosphere, good story, and a topic we never talk about/feel ashamed to talk about though it exists and is quite common. I like this kind of photos !
lol, there ain't no sex happening in that picture - that's the point.
Ido S: Disclaimer: Didn't read the entire post, so I may have missed some key points.
The LX100 has a fast lens, faster than any Micro Four Thirds zoom lens of the same focal length range. f/1.7-2.8 is really, really great for such a compact camera+lens. I guess it can't be achieved in an interchangeable lens for Micro Four Thirds, otherwise one would've already existed. Maybe it's an even shorter flange distance, or something... But I could be wrong.
How short does it have to be for you? You're a twitter fan, huh?
re price:I think that a lot of people fail to realize that $500-$1000 for a camera isn't that much money for a big portion of the market. Then tell these folks that the new breed of compacts is, for all intents and purposes, as good as the 4+ year old DSLRs they bought in the later aughts, but smaller and more stylish, and you have a pretty good sized TAM.
fastlass: how are they able to source the parts for a product that's 11 years old? must have great supply chain management.
so it was announced in 2003 and release in 2013?
how are they able to source the parts for a product that's 11 years old? must have great supply chain management.
I'm probably speaking for most of us when I say that Nikon seems to have poisoned 200 years of photography with this move.
The Leica is what it is. Curious if they produce Aluminum colored lenses to coordinate (like my Olympus m43s...)?
Jogger: I prefer my 50 to be cheap, small, light weight and have good enough image quality.
sounds like my first 3 husbands.
consulting: Missing the hot shoe. Missing a little bit more zoom. Good: Sensor size. Bad: This model is not male and not female, not consumer (too complicated and price too high) and not professional (too limited for this price). Question: Shall the customer only pay for "IT'S A SONY!" ?
Price is extremely good. This is a very value conscious camera.
Good article. I wish they'd shut up about legacy lenses already. People might use legacy lenses as a stop gap measure, but the price of a new lens is so cheap that consumers will eventually buy new except in a few marginal cases.
Since you can't buy a pocket protector any more, this will have to do.
The aperture comparison graph is very nice. thx!