M Lammerse: Camera manufacturers make dedicated connector points on camera's to connect straps to which you can hang around your neck or shoulder.I think the manufacturer of this product seems not to understand that.
Maybe you don't understand how uncomfortable that can be. The sling strap method is a very comfortable way of carrying heavy gear & it is at the ready for easy shooting too. This product is nicely made & looks like it would function quite nicely. I made my own version a few years ago wear it was an aluminium plate but bent up at the end with a brass eyelet hole for the sling strap & the rest of it was padded (built up with cork) & leather covered & the shape complimented the battery grip on the camera, making it more comfortable than before. It didn't allow for tripod mounting though, whereas this has taken care of that as well.
Sardonic G: My stubbornness in staying loyal to Nikon products is starting to look like an abusive relationship. First the D600, now the D810. Perhaps I should just stick with my Bronica.
Loyalty is OK, but one hopes the loyalty is appreciated & if Nikon are addressing the issues then that's a good start.
Reality Check: Sadly typical there are so many quelled by the 'isolated affect explanation' released for nothing more than damage control.The 'long exposures' and 'crop modes' may be what was reported, but it is by no means the only times hot/white pixels are occurring at an unacceptable level. Instead of the fanboy denial approach, how about take a look at Nikon's own marketing materials - when/if you can find them. Nikon France has conveniently removed most of the campfire images, and full rez samples. Those images were not crop modes, not 60sec exposures, they were simply higher ISO settings and are plastered by tens of thousands of hot/white pixels.
This is simply a result of the gain tweaking Nikon played with in offering the 'new' ISO64 sensitivity setting. Which is just the same range scale for Sony's 36mp sensor slid down to ISO64 and added Expeed processing. So the D800/e ISO100 became the new ISO64, and ISO12800 became the D810's ISO6400 - complete with variable gain artifacts...
I'm surprised there isn't a menu function to remap the pixels as a user! I can do it any time I wish on my cameras (not that I need to except on rare occasions it might show up).
LSE: meh, use LR like everybody else.
Or use Capture One instead.
Chris2J: To me: a stupid exercise.
Chris, maybe you should tell someone who cares!
For myself, I enjoyed these photos.
Just another Canon shooter: Who made the sensor?
I would guess, probably Sony.
eastwestphoto: Unfortunately After market lens makers like Tamron banked all there sales on DSLR kings Nikon & Canon. When the Mirrorless cameras of m4/3 rds arrived in 2009 the lenses did NOT! Its been that way for years, Sigma, Tamron, etc. third party m4/3 rds and Sony e-mount FF series lenses are far and few between. maybe they didn't realize Mirrorless DSLM cameras were so terrific; whatever there EXCUSE is, there still FIVE years behind the sales curves. maybe they didn't WANT to pay the licensing fees? Never the less the marketplace is huge for Aftermarket in m4/3 rd's & Sony FE series, so its about time; well i been saying and posting this for five years! Even at the Javis center trade show of latest and greatest in NYC once a year, I told tamron, & Sigma too wake up! All I got was Blank stares from the sales Reps. Maybe its NOT a free marketplace and the KINGS are controlling optical capitalism? Don@Eastwestphoto
To whyamihere.Don't forget the discovery that the 'you beaut' 75mm Olympus lens was actually designed or made by Sigma. :)
pedroboe100: Real men don't shoot super zooms.
Real men don't need to look sideways at others to see if theirs is bigger! It's not the size that matters, but the quality that counts & how it is used. And that applies to cameras too! ;)
"The FZ1000's maximum aperture drops off very quickly, as soon as you start to zoom, and by around 150mm equivalent, it's a whole stop slower than the Sony RX10. However, this still leaves it half a stop faster than the likes of the Olympus Stylus 1."
What are you saying??? The Olympus Stylus 1 is a constant f/2.8 for the equivalent of 28-300!!! (I'm talking brightness, not DoF)
OK, you're trying to say it doesn't perform in low light as well as larger sensors. Yeah, I know that, but it is still quite nice for its size.
Hli5d: 70 years.. I lived in Ca in 1994 when it was 50 years and remember the memorials.. Time flies. June 6 th is a special day for me. My dad was in the resistance during wwii and was together with his brother, arrested by Gestapo in the morning of june 6th 1944 - D-Day. My father escaped by pure luck, but his brother was shipped to concentration camp, which he survied after 11 month of agony. My father continued his actions in the resistance until the war finished. I have been raised by my father always telling me that we have our freedom today because of to the soldiers who died on the beaches that morning. My father passed away on june 6 th 1998... This date is just something to me.
On the western front thousands of Australians lost their lives too, but somehow that isn't remembered the same as this area. Our Prime Minister while over there was highlighting this case (on a TV interview).
Ross the Fidller: I am looking at this because of someone buying it, but why do you have to be region specific, "when it was introduced in the Fall of 2012.", with the timing of its release? I'm sorry, but as an Australian, I 'fall' about laughing at that term for Autumn. ;) Could you please remember it isn't just North Americans reading this & refer to the time of the year by month or quarters or something else that isn't region specific.
Your seasons would be hot or hot & wet, wouldn't it? ;)
I like that one bluevellet! :)
I'm sorry to stir up trouble, but I just thought referring to a time of year in calendar terms rather than seasons (of North America) just makes more sense. "In the Fall" does indicate to me that it is the time of the year as seen in North America, but I guess some people are amused at our description of distances here being often given in travel times rather than km or miles (it's been many years since we used miles here).
I am looking at this because of someone buying it, but why do you have to be region specific, "when it was introduced in the Fall of 2012.", with the timing of its release? I'm sorry, but as an Australian, I 'fall' about laughing at that term for Autumn. ;) Could you please remember it isn't just North Americans reading this & refer to the time of the year by month or quarters or something else that isn't region specific.
smafdy: So, Oly made a less than stellar camera. It will be interesting to see if they can actually fix this problem.
Regardless, Oly's performance and product development over the past decade, or so, has been first class.
For the sake of the good will the company has developed, I hope there is a fix. If there isn't, I hope Oly is treated no more or less harshly than the big two.
You want to know if they can fix a mechanical issue? I believe they have made a reasonable result within the firmware for this situation that appears to be a very usable fix. You can't do that to fix for oil splatters on sensors by another camera maker. There is no perfect camera & most have to bring some sort of firmware upgrade to get around some issues & sometimes it's a physical issue that may need attention. At least Olympus replaced my display bezel with a tiny insignificant crack (from a slightly over tightened screw) on the E-M5.
Theelderkeynes: It is still unclear to me whether the OM-D E-M10 or the Pen E-P2 and others so far not addressed with this fix will get or should have this type of fix. DP Review's assurances on this isssue being fixed as far as the M10 is concerned are conditioned quite rightly (in their review) by the phrase 'in our testing'. And not a thing from C.Nishino on the subject or anyone else at Olympus (see below). As an owner of both the M10 and E-P2 and a string of micro 4/3 lenses I would like to know if my faith in the system and specifically Olympus has been misplaced. Once again this loyal and long term customer waits for a positive and constructive response.
To peevee1, "As far as I understand, E-M10 uses the same shutter as E-M5, with slower curtains." Apparently there is a firmware upgrade (due on the 21st May I believe) for the E-M10 that will also add the 0 sec. Anti-Shock setting, so for E-M5 users this would be welcome too but I'm not sure if this will happen at some point in time.
thecameraeye: I hope there's an update to the E-PL5 with the zero second antishock too.
The rumours say the E-M5 won't get it. http://www.43rumors.com/good-and-bad-news-0-shock-dramatically-improves-the-e-p5-image-quality/
DimLS: We need it for EM 10 also! I never use 1/60- 1/180.
Its the best update Oly must make to all cams that can support it.For me its crucial for the market share Oly needs. You cannot sell a product that reduces the resolution of the cam by e.g. 50% or 10 % or 20% at common shutter speeds, and expect to gain market traction. By the way, Oly is the manufacturer i have given the most money and have used the less than any other photographic brand.
You should be seeing that next week along with another E-M1 update(1.4). This was leaked & these two are being delayed till the 21st May.
Ed Gill: I also find this an interesting camera at a "fair" price. I just wish there were some confirmed specifications out there. For example:Flash sync speeds (couldn't even find in the manual). Type of shutter, if similar to Fuji x100s, does it have the same limitations? Does the data port for the viewfinder also support mic/headphone input/output?Since this is really a m4/3 format camera, the price seems very fair compared to the hideously overpriced m4/3 lenses, making this a strong contender for my $ compared to a Pany GX7.What they (Canon) needs to fix to really sell me: Flash pass-through port on the viewfinder - so I can have flash AND viewfinder not OR viewfinder.KILLER ACCESSORY: True optical viewfinder with superimposed info (zoom-able or three position (24/50/100) with FOV brightlines).Wishful development: Same camera but in-body shutter and m4/3 compliant mount with Canon made adapters for mounting M/EF-S/EF lenses.
Flash pass through (the EVF) or rather the lack of it, was what turned me off the Oly PENs & probably why the OM-D range have taken off instead.
mosc: This camera is suspiciously close to the canon APS-C pixel density and crop factor for it to be a totally different sensor. Has anybody ripped one appart and directly measured the chip in comparison to Canon's APS-C? It just seems far fetched that they would make a sensor like this specific for the G series and much more likely that they'd worry about differentiating their APS-C DSLR line from the G series by not utilizing the entire sensor.
Could be a laugh if they used a Sony sensor in it! ;)