deep7

deep7

Lives in New Zealand (Aotearoa) New Zealand (Aotearoa)
Works as a writer/photographer/ecologist
Has a website at deeppics.com
Joined on May 10, 2008
About me:

God makes it, I see it and photograph it. Sometimes that works well!

Comments

Total: 290, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
On Kodak Pixpro S-1 First Impressions Review preview (182 comments in total)
In reply to:

Kipplemaster: Small cameras like this should have USB charging. I believe this is the only m43 camera which does, which would be a very big selling point for me. I like DNG RAW too.

Wouldn't that be a giant pain? It would mean you couldn't use your camera while the battery was charging, even if you had spare batteries. No thanks! I had a Sony V3 which charged in-camera and it was quite frustrating.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 25, 2014 at 09:16 UTC
On Kodak Pixpro S-1 First Impressions Review preview (182 comments in total)

The sample photos would do justice to quite a few well-fancied cameras. For what is alleged to be a budget camera with kit lenses, they are surprisingly good. Nice sensor, nice processing, good glass. Go "Kodak"!

Direct link | Posted on Jun 25, 2014 at 09:14 UTC as 32nd comment
On 101_0071 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

There may be quite a difference in sharpness between Nelson's knees and his hat but this is perfectly usable. For a potentially budget lens, at full stretch and wide open, it's outstanding.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 25, 2014 at 09:10 UTC as 1st comment
On 101_0281 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Not perfect right into the corners but, really, this is great if it's supposed to be a budget camera/lens.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 25, 2014 at 08:39 UTC as 1st comment
On 101_0313 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Wide open at 12mm? These lenses seem pretty decent.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 25, 2014 at 08:36 UTC as 1st comment
On 101_0033 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Looks like it was taken with an Olympus! Which is a compliment. The lens is not too shabby at full stretch and wide open either. Good one.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 25, 2014 at 07:36 UTC as 1st comment
On P9400027_ISO125 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (2 comments in total)

The lens is sharp but the ring-shaped highlights and double lines in the out-of-focus background look pretty harsh. It's all a compromise, I guess!

Nice pic.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 13, 2014 at 23:58 UTC as 2nd comment
In reply to:

Lee Jay: This wouldn't be necessary if Apple weren't such a bunch of morons.

I still can't figure out why anyone buys anything from them. Their devices stink and their "our way or the highway" attitude is repulsive, and always has been.

Some serious ignorance here. I've got better things to do.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 2, 2014 at 05:35 UTC
In reply to:

makofoto: What?! Mac's are often the choice for photographers. I've never had any problems uploading to my Macs. Macs come with Image Capture, located in the Utility Folder, under Applications that is a default downloading app.

iTunes has a command to transfer music/purchases from your iPhone/iPad etc.

Also, if you click on the "Apps" heading when your gadget is plugged in, there is an option, if you scroll down, to up/download many types of files to Apps that support it. For example, I often download gps logger files like this. It's quite simple but the biggest problem is that these things don't come with realistic instructions!

However, this gadget and the important software part of you purchase does more. It seems to allow more direct access to your files and the ability to effectively increase the available storage (though the value of that is obviously limited as it uses the only available port and hangs out like a giant wart!). If I've read this right...

Direct link | Posted on Jun 2, 2014 at 00:33 UTC
In reply to:

Lee Jay: This wouldn't be necessary if Apple weren't such a bunch of morons.

I still can't figure out why anyone buys anything from them. Their devices stink and their "our way or the highway" attitude is repulsive, and always has been.

Right, so I point out that the first comment in this little sub-thread is incorrect and this becomes a story about music quality??? (Ironic that it was Apple who totally revolutionised the music industry but that's beside the point).

I've used computers since before Windows days, before DOS even. On my desk is a Mac, a very new (and beautifully made) Windows computer and a new Google Android tablet (the latter two are provided by my work). I also have an iPhone and iPod. I know which system makes life easy and which two regularly make me pretty grumpy.

For music, I have a full analogue system with high-end turntable and amp, plus reel-to-reel and cassette tapes, as well as a full digital system with CDs and iPod/iPhone. I have the choice and rarely use the analogue system.

Rant away, if you like. It just doesn't make you right.

Calling one of the world's most successful businesses "morons" doesn't exactly make you look like a genius, does it?

Moving on...

Direct link | Posted on Jun 1, 2014 at 23:30 UTC
In reply to:

Lee Jay: This wouldn't be necessary if Apple weren't such a bunch of morons.

I still can't figure out why anyone buys anything from them. Their devices stink and their "our way or the highway" attitude is repulsive, and always has been.

They are anything but morons! Their "make something that just works" attitude is far from repulsive. But I guess not everyone is smart enough to understand that - luckily no one forces you to use Apple.

Direct link | Posted on May 31, 2014 at 20:29 UTC

Interesting use of technology but most of the subject matter is pretty dull, especially for this sort of technique. The flying birds and skateboarder are good though. You really need to suspend some sort of animation, otherwise it just looks like you've used software to spin a photo. Nice that all those phones and the Surface could communicate.

Direct link | Posted on May 24, 2014 at 21:13 UTC as 38th comment
On Olympus OM-D E-M10 and E-M1 get firmware updates article (50 comments in total)
In reply to:

Artpt: No luck with an updated video codec.....

To all forum members, an chance that the EM5 will be updated with this in mind?

Hopeful that Phase Detect and Contrast Detect sensors will be part of the next generation of M43 to bridge the DSLR advantage.

Very well.

Direct link | Posted on May 24, 2014 at 07:00 UTC
On Olympus OM-D E-M10 and E-M1 get firmware updates article (50 comments in total)
In reply to:

Digitall: Nice news! Olympus please update your eye sensor for EVF to turn On when approaching the eye, and Off when the move away instantly.
And the option to choose other colors for focus peaking, Red/Yellow for example.

Anyway, any opinions before and after this update?

My EM1's eye sensor works exactly like you've asked for. Has yours got a problem?

Direct link | Posted on May 24, 2014 at 07:00 UTC
In reply to:

Jun2: No LTE support, that would be an issue.

Can you use a phone as a wireless hotspot? Or plug in a modem?

Direct link | Posted on May 21, 2014 at 22:38 UTC
In reply to:

drh681: Finally.
this is where they should have started.
does anybody like the fact that it will run full up photoshop?
or that it comes with a pen(stylus)?

I prefer the small screen - more portable for field work, then plug into a big screen back home when you need more space.

Direct link | Posted on May 21, 2014 at 22:26 UTC
In reply to:

TwoMetreBill: 8GB of RAM for serious image editing, NOT!

..but, with the docking station, it COULD be a desktop replacement for a lot of people!

Direct link | Posted on May 21, 2014 at 22:24 UTC
In reply to:

deep7: This is almost enough to make me move over from Apple. Such a great concept.

Shame the mini display port isn't Thunderbolt so you could run various adaptors, other than just a screen.

"abortabort": the iPad is not the same concept. In any case, the Surface Pro was the first time I came across a full computer in tablet form which allowed full touch screen and conventional user control.

"Menneisyys": The screen isn't the problem. Firewire and Ethernet are. I use both a lot.

Direct link | Posted on May 21, 2014 at 22:22 UTC

This is almost enough to make me move over from Apple. Such a great concept.

Shame the mini display port isn't Thunderbolt so you could run various adaptors, other than just a screen.

Direct link | Posted on May 20, 2014 at 23:05 UTC as 53rd comment | 4 replies
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Review preview (665 comments in total)
In reply to:

JeffreyJC: $800.00 is almost twice as much as this camera should be. You can buy for example a Oly PM2 with 2 lens kit for $370. Sure this is a great camera but a $800 dollar great camera ? NOT EVEN CLOSE!

I have the original G1X (similar sensor to G1XII) and an EM1. There is no way I would say the EM1 had a better sensor. All this talk of extra dynamic range doesn't really work out in practice. Both have good highlight headroom but the Canon recovers blue out of blown skies better and the Olympus recovers reds and yellows better.

Both can recover extra shadow detail. The Canon gets some colour noise if you push it but the Olympus has little tonal separation around the black point and you get a posterisation effect if you push it, which is hard to deal with. Differences on test charts don't translate to the real world unless you are a jpeg shooter and don't drive the camera yourself.

It's easier to balance detail and noise on the Canon at 1600 "ISO" but there's not much in it.

The most obvious difference is that, shooting RAW, default colours on the Olympus are more pleasing, if not more accurate, on default Lightroom settings.

GaryJP is bang on. Experience counts a lot.

Direct link | Posted on May 10, 2014 at 01:19 UTC
Total: 290, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »