I enjoyed these images and also the others you linked to. Some lovely gentle and sympathetic work, that was both calming and uplifting to me at the same time.
All the best
Hi, I think it's a great image. Perhaps not completely to everyones taste, but there again, what is?
I do not usually watch these videos, but I am pleased I took the time to watch this. Very good indeed. He is a real pro. Very entertaining also.
Personally I think it is a very nice image indeed, and reading about how it was produced was very interesting. I tend not to do much PP, but seeing how you have done this has given me some ideas. Many thanks!
Some really great images there.
I enjoyed those very much. As good as the colour ones are, I also prefer the monochrome. Which is a 1st for me as I usually do not appreciate monochrome images.
I really like that image. Who cares about a bit of purple fringing?
Cameron R Hood: What a shame; they make GREAT stuff. Been a big fan since the film days.
Hi I bought one of their small LED panel lights just the other day.
However you look at it there are some very nice images there. And I enjoyed looking at them.
Yes, liked those very much. Perhaps I should get a bit more creative myself!
rondom: Next in the series: tips for photographing dating couples...
I thought some of those images were lovely, and he made a lot of sense to me.
Well done him!
That is a great project. Very exciting. Well done them!
piratejabez: I like everything I've seen about this camera. Love the optional grip and strap. Can't wait to see first-hand performance reports. Way to go, Fuji!
I am an m4/3 guy, but I do like the look of this Fuji and I think they may well have hit the sweet spot with this. I agree that APS-C sensor is good enough for the vast majority, as are the latest m4/3. FF is the dead end really. Who really needs it? You can get thin enough DOF on both APS-C and m4/3 with the right lenses.
And yes I do like the A7. Looks like a nice camera and will suit some for sure.
Identity: I'm sure this is a lovely lens, but I was expecting shallower DOF in an F/1.2 lens. For me, APS-C is still the best balance of size, image quality, cost, and DOF control.
Hi, you could not pay me to lug a D800 and equivlent glass around when I could use a much smaller m43 and this lens and get results that are good enough for me.
If I felt I needed this lens and could afford to buy it then why not? Photography is a hobby for me, and over the number of years I would likely use the lens it is not unreasonably expensive.
I could drive a Toyota, but I like my Porsche.
This is great news. A massive timesaver for me.
larrytusaz: Why do most articles have you click each picture to read each item on the list? Why not make it one long page so you can click it once & just read, not "next, next, next, next, next, next, nex....."
I agree, ditch this one. All on 1 or 2 pages for this.
I never really thought about this type of photography (panoramas) before reading this article. They always seemed like too much effort. I also did not want an Iphone 5S, but now I am seriously interested!
I am not interested in mobile phones so would not have seen this article on the connect site. But I am interested in photography so am pleased to find it here.
Thank you for posting it.
This is a very interesting camera, and 20m is enough for most underwater photographic purposes. I would dive with it a bit deeper than 20m but would not operate any buttons below 20m. In fact the buttons may depress by themselves at 30m because of the water pressure.
It's a shame it does not support Olympus cameras. I would love remote control for my EM-5. Yes it seems expensive!