ekaton: Size and weight advantage of mirrorless, where did you go?
It's there all the time.My laptop is portable, but I can still attach four 27" monitors to it. I can do that in the office, I can do that at home, but I can still travel light if I wanted to.It's the same with mirrorless cameras: you need them to be light - they can be. You need them to use great bulky lenses - they can do that too.
lem12: This cam. loaded with features useful for any outdoor adventurer not just under water photography. But unfortunately its 1/2.3 limits its use for any other outdoor photography.. Some of these new cams. come loaded with features but with tiny sensors - small enough to limit all its photo features. I would buy this cam. but with 1/1.7 sized sensors at least.
1" or bust!With such cam you don't need huge zoom, but you need a good DR
Shangri La: How do you apply same adjustments (WB/Lens correction/etc) to several images, like you can 'Sync' in LR?
I know you can save the adjustment as a preset and then apply to the images, but that way you have to go through each and every image manually. Unlike 'Sync' in LR, where you can one-click apply. Thanks.
Also: ctrl-shift-C (to copy adjustments from one picture) and ctrl-shift-V (to apply adjustments to all the other selected images). Note that it will apply all the adjustments (crop, healing brush, local adjustments), as opposed to LR's selection of the adjustments you want to sync.
Akpinxit: I could never manage to sharpen my photos in C1 without producing additional (unwonted ) artifacts . LR has a really high edge in it .
My experience is totally opposite. Maybe it's the way these two applications deal with Raw files of different camera producers. I hate the way LR is sharpening (adding grain to borders). I did it manually in PS before. C1 does it great and "structure" tool deals fabulously with textures. I have Sony a6000, and I think Sony and PhaseOne work close together (C1 is the first, and currently the only software that can read a7rII raw files), which might be the reason why this works so good on C1.
These go to eleven, man!
Rashkae: Where's the A6000? It's a fantastic little beast.
... AND it is smaller than all the cameras above (including V3, which is smaller 2mm in height, but bigger 11mm in width!). NX1, on the other hand, is not even small - it is comparable to D7100 (4mm lower and 3mm wider)Talking 'bout "small and powerfull"....
Really don't understand the lack of a6000. It's, arguably, better or at least on par with all these cameras, and price-wise it looks like this (todays bh prices):- NX1 (body) $1,499.99- X-T1 (body) $1,199.95- GH4 (body) $1,497.99- E-M1 (body) $1,299.00- V3 (with kit lens) $1,196.95- A6000 (body) $448.00More than $1000 difference between GH4 and A6000????
wansai: for the price of admission, surely any sane person would get one of the more recent and VASTLY superior mirrorless cameras like the Nex 5R, which incidentally is about the same size roughly (possibly even smaller). the price is about the same and you have some connctivity options as well as options to change your lense specific to your style of shooting.
these phone cameras, the thing is, you must work around the tool. i have always felt tat the tool should work towards my needs, especialy if i'm going to spend half a grand upwards for it.
the quality of the picture is poor even by modern phone camera standards and the price high for a poorly performing superzoom.
what i don't understand is, why are mobile photographers not more discerning or critical about their tools? i think it's a valid form of photography and i enjoy viewing it, but one should not be so dismissive about the critical flaws of a product you're about to spend money on.
This particular camera is maybe not worth that kind of money, but if it paves a way to the whole new format of cameras, then it's very important. I can't wait for Sony to create such camera-phone with 1" sensor, and I'm pretty sure they are capable of doing that (rx100 + phone/3G).
eivissa1: The designer of Nex cameras should be fired. Really silly and unbalanced form!
Well, call me silly and unbalanced, but I like the looks of this camera very much. I think of it as of a sticker at the bottom of the lens, so it doesn't bother me that the lens is bigger than the camera. I like that the design is not "retro" (I'm pretty much fed up with retro looks, instagram and such hipsteria). Ergonomics is also very good for such a small object (i have relatively meaty fingers). Anyway, much better than all the p&s cameras that I had before. Also, I can put this camera and 4 lenses in my bag, and I think that I could put no more than 2 lenses if I had d5100 or similar dslr.