Professor999

Professor999

Joined on Jun 25, 2012

Comments

Total: 111, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II: A professional's opinion article (509 comments in total)

http://seattletimes.com/html/photogalleries/photography2022265629/26.html

Direct link | Posted on Oct 23, 2014 at 13:45 UTC as 70th comment | 1 reply
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II: A professional's opinion article (509 comments in total)

http://www.bettinahansen.com/index.php?/about-this-site/

Direct link | Posted on Oct 23, 2014 at 13:37 UTC as 71st comment
In reply to:

viking79: Pop up viewfinder is nice, but how does one hold onto that camera? It looks like it has no comfortable way to hold it.

@Boerseuntjie
feed the troll or not?

Direct link | Posted on May 20, 2014 at 18:58 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III First Impressions Review preview (2962 comments in total)
In reply to:

Babka08: I imagine Canon GX team have an uncomfortable pit in their stomach right now. The fast lens is an amazing achievement. The slow long end of the MKI has always been a bane. And an evf... This is the perfect fit between a cell phone and a dslr.

the samsung hater returns!

Direct link | Posted on May 20, 2014 at 18:30 UTC
On Sigma introduces Photo Pro 5.5 with Monochrome mode article (20 comments in total)

This news is more recent than Nikon's (check the time stamp).
Question, Why is this article pushed down the list?
I almost missed it.
Normally articles are posted chronologically.
Am I missing something?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 21, 2013 at 18:32 UTC as 6th comment | 1 reply
On Leica invites entries for its Oskar Barnack Award 2013 article (34 comments in total)

Except for the under 25 category applicants must be a professional photographer.
What constitutes a professional photographer?
As it isn''t made clear, is it open to interpretation?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 10, 2012 at 17:32 UTC as 13th comment | 4 replies
On Photokina 2012: Interview - Sun Hong Lim of Samsung article (99 comments in total)
In reply to:

kff: I would buy a new NX with Wi-Fi, but they don't have AF adapter for K mount lenses ... :(

He said AF I didn't.
I tried to give some information to a fellow poster as an alternative.
Why do you have a problem with this?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2012 at 20:23 UTC
On Photokina 2012: Interview - Sun Hong Lim of Samsung article (99 comments in total)
In reply to:

kff: I would buy a new NX with Wi-Fi, but they don't have AF adapter for K mount lenses ... :(

NX to k0mount lens adapter

http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/photo-news/535442/samsung-nx-lens-adapter-for-pentax-k-and-samsung-gx-lenses-review-and-picture-gallery

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2012 at 15:49 UTC

Just saw this field test of the K30 for anyone who may be interested,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RMfSRpEASg&feature=relmfu

Direct link | Posted on Sep 10, 2012 at 14:33 UTC as 4th comment
In reply to:

CameraLabTester: Pentax used to be running with Champions in the film era.

I wonder what happened...

Reasons:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Pentax users please don't get upset and blow your top. Truth hurts.

It used to be a very very good brand of a camera.

.

@ Boerseuntjie,
Pentax used to use Samung sensors e.g. K7.
K5 and K30 use Sony sensors.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 28, 2012 at 11:03 UTC
In reply to:

peevee1: Oops, half-review again. They are definitely on vacations.

"You get what you pay for",
As the saying goes 'a fool and his money are soon parted'.

Of course you wouldn't believe the daily mail uk article as it disagrees with your point of view.

How about Reuters,

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/06/us-samsung-earnings-forecast-idUSBRE8640WO20120706

cnbc,

http://www.cnbc.com/id/48345895/Smartphones_Power_Record_Samsung_Profit_of_5_9_Billion_During_Apple_Lull

Industry Week,

http://www.industryweek.com/global-economy/samsung-posts-record-profit

Baaaa!!!!

Or sour grapes?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 23, 2012 at 21:29 UTC
In reply to:

peevee1: Oops, half-review again. They are definitely on vacations.

3,000 grand?
For a TV?

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-10/sony-forecasts-first-profit-in-five-years-as-hirai-restructures.html

And they're laying off 10,000 employees?

And Samsung,

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2136166/Samsung-roars-record-5-2BN-profit-sells-20-000-Galaxy-handsets-hour--analyst-warns-Apple-fail-just-like-Sony.html

Direct link | Posted on Aug 23, 2012 at 19:38 UTC
In reply to:

JesperMP: X-5 ?? Forgive me for thinking it was a replacement for K-5.

I think that naming it X-5 is a stab at all the "X"-named cameras from the other camera brands.

Nothing wrong with this camera per se. It is not for me, but for everyone in the market for an ultra-zoom with a viewfinder, why not ?

the X is used as the previous bridge cameras were the X70 in 2009 and X90 in 2010 pre-dating the current use of X.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 23, 2012 at 15:24 UTC
In reply to:

Tape5: What a great compact beautifully designed affordable light and capable piece of garbage.

Got my Kr and K5 and they work like a dream.
The K30 also looks great.
The nikon with wifi costs 350, the Pentax 280.
It's also about half the price of some other bridge cameras.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 23, 2012 at 14:52 UTC
In reply to:

RadPhoto: Doesn't this look like Sony NEX? Can't Samsung come up with something original?

Your ban obviously didn't improve your manners.
Just pointing out the real reason you were banned.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 23, 2012 at 14:36 UTC
In reply to:

Beestripe: How can it be like a 'smartphone' if it's not a phone? Just saying.

Hope you enjoyed your break.

Just back from shooting with my Nex 5N and EM5 actually.

That's because I'm not blinkered, not a hater, and will use the kit that works for the occasion and not blindly follow one brand and hate another.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 23, 2012 at 14:33 UTC
In reply to:

tinternaut: I'm surprised. I expected Samsung to be first to market with this. Now, give us this in a CSC with built in 3G/GPS and All Share compatibility (oh, and Jelly Bean please so Google Now can point out nearby places of photographic interest).

Cue the hater.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 22, 2012 at 18:41 UTC
In reply to:

Beestripe: How can it be like a 'smartphone' if it's not a phone? Just saying.

Happy shopping then.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 22, 2012 at 18:38 UTC
In reply to:

RadPhoto: Doesn't this look like Sony NEX? Can't Samsung come up with something original?

I think one got banned for using vulgar language towards other posters.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 22, 2012 at 14:56 UTC
In reply to:

Boerseuntjie: Will this shut up the Sony does not have any good lens selection crowd?
No, but it's a good start

@What do I know,

Rather, you have attacked me.

Writing lies saying that I hope Sony fail.

For which you still have not supplied any info. Only your words or in this case lies.

No, I am not Sam Carriere. But I notice that even though that poster claimed that he wanted Sony to fail in a post 5 days ago you didn't reply to that.

Instead you continued to attack me with backing up your accusations.

BTW VAIN not VEIN.

YOU were the one who attacked me in your fist post. Accusing me of wanting Sony to fail.

Yes. it shows who I am. Someone who will not back down when attacked and accused of something that he is completely innocent of.

I'm sure this will be your last post as you cannot justify anything that you have accused me of.

Instead you accuse me of being another poster. Untrue and without any proof to the contrary.

As previously mentioned YOU were the one to attack me, I have merely defended myself in the face of your lies.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 31, 2012 at 08:51 UTC
Total: 111, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »