I mainly shoot JPEG so the lens corrections including CA are a very welcome surprise. The 'LOW' ISO is also very useful. Can't wait to see more!
Axel Vercauteren: Better AF in live view, nice.Alas nothing about how accurate the picture on the LCD of the final image is. Also: how well is exposure simulated?
@T3. I was referring to reviews of X-S1 and P7100 and other cams at neoamera.com which note errors in the live histogram. Maybe unlikely for other cams (Rebels) but not right by definition.
To T3.Ok. How reliable is the live histogram from the 100D? Or from the Rebels in general?
Better AF in live view, nice.Alas nothing about how accurate the picture on the LCD of the final image is. Also: how well is exposure simulated?
Still the awkward rear dial, if you want to develop a RSI buy this one.
So Panny got rid of the awkward rear dial, good news!
Test: Noise of XZ-2 compared to LX7/G15 etc.
See for yourself: http://www.focus-numerique.com/test-1570/compact-olympus-xz-2-bruit-electronique-12.html
Again a sticky control-dial (as on FZ150 etc.) and a lousy user manual. Rubbish.
According to imaging-resource.com the X-5 does not support Aperture- or Shutter priority. What a waste.
I didn't buy the FZ150 because the rear dial is extremely difficult to handle. From the manual of the FZ200 it doesn't seem that the functions of this dial have changed, so I hope that the mechanics of this dial have changed for the better.