Wondering if they will eventually issue a pro photo editing software sometimes in the future... at the same level with Final Cut Pro.
Call this off topic if you will, but can anyone speculate why can't nikon fit the guts of the d810 in a body the size if the nikon F2?
Nothing more, noting less, just the size of the F2... Not for the retro looks, just for the size and portability.
Same bubbly design, but sure, we are all pros, ergonomics are important, style, look, portability is not important, right?
SeeRoy: "Weather-resistant"A worthless designation, now popular with many manufacturers since it actually costs nothing to offer. What are the chances of getting a warranty replacement/repair when these weasel-words fail to protect the electronics from water ingress? Slim I'd say. You'd be told you got it "too wet".
WR - It's just a marketing thing... Nobody is going to shoot in pouring rain. You get wet, the front element gets wet, you can't see... Dust? Well, if you care about your gear, you clean the lenses on regular basis, regardless...
What this really needed since 2007 was an exposure compensation button. A simple +/- thing. Yes, everything else is welcome, but this is really basic.
Really surprised how good the movie quality is... Especially when compared to the Fujifilm cameras.
Either Sony is really good, along with Panasonic, or Fujifilm is that bad. Really like Fujifilm otherwise, got many pieces from them...
saralecaire: This can be done with any Windows tablet/netbook with a 4G router or mobile phone. There are free software already out there which allows for this, so there is nothing innovative here.
Yes, and this whole system would be outdated if there was no issue with the data speed over 4G.
Nokia has the most functional interface in the industry, by a large margin. Period.
The Android based ones are nowhere near. Apple's is really a joke, where all you got is a button... Can't believe how many shots I've missed by being with the iPhone ever since it was launched, 2007...
Lawrencew: Pity they didn't improve the video quality. That is the thing still putting me off buying what otherwise looks like an excellent Camera - along with the X-T1 which suffers the same problem.
Great cameras, both the E and T, but video is not comparable to the competition.
The still frame side by side that dpreview has posted in the review, video page, shows unacceptable moire and artifacts. The T is the worse.
I hope this is something to be improved via firmware in the future...
joel avery: Is it splash proof like the new S5?
They can do one with lens barrel extending sideways, all inside. There are some older very compact zoom cameras with no external moving parts.
They are a little bulkier, but this is bulky as well. Does not bother me at all, if I get some optical zoom.
And really, no need for 10x zoom, a 4x or 5x max would be great.
peterwr: "With a 13MP *1/3.06-inch* Sony Exmor CMOS sensor..."
FFS. When are camera manufacturers going to start quoting sensor sizes in millimetres? This 1/x.x business is needlessly confusing. OK, so maybe that's the point - big numbers sound more impressive to the inexperienced, even if they have a 1 over them - but still, millimetres (or even millimeters) would make imaging chips a lot easier to compare. It would make it easier to estimate the 35mm equivalent focal length of the lenses, too.
C'mon DPReview - how about you start doing it unilaterally? You're influential enough that maybe you could change industry policy.
I've been saying this for years! Millimeters!
For the Portland bridge test --- all that gear and effort spend, and they came out with ZERO files?
How is that possible? They forgot the put the card in? Details?
Whenever I see a Hasselblad related article, I head straight to comments.
Fine camera I am sure, but hey, no crocodile skin grip?
Chris_in_Osaka: Mine is bigger than yours!
The bulkier the better, the longer the lens, the... You know...
arhmatic: Oh, bubbly cameras... Why everything these days look more and more like a melted bar soap?
By contrast, Fuji, Olympus - well done!
Well, I kind of care how my camera looks/feels. I guess I am not a pro then... going back to school now. good night...
I used the D2x for years... Chosen over Canon mostly for ergonomics. For the price tag, Nikon could engineer the weight and bulkiness a little, which would improve ergonomics significantly, while keeping aesthetics under control. My 2 cents.
@petemod - Want to talk ergonomics on a camera 1.3kg heavy?
Retzius: Does it come in red and grey?
Does it come with style? oh wait, it's a nikon...
Oh, bubbly cameras... Why everything these days look more and more like a melted bar soap?
Terry Breedlove: Fuji nor Sony have anything even close to this.
Why would they?
They got something that Nikon seems not to get...