As always with Hallseblad, I am here just for the comments.
cgarrard: Wait, I get it.
"If Leica can re-brand a Panasonic and sell it for double... then Hasselblad can re-brand a Sony and sell it for triple.... brilliant."
Marty, it does.
My personal threshold is 3.14 times. (phi)
Nobody doing the "does it blend" jokes?
Zeisschen: I love the design!
Are those two screws on the front plate really holding anything?
Just for cosmetics, to emphasize the "tough" idea?
pixelpushing: I think Olympus is diluting their product line unnecessarily. Unless this is a replacement for one of the prior models (it doesn't appear so, with the shuffling of features), they're just going to muddy the waters.
A new generation sensor and moving away/up from 16MP is going to be needed, soon.
This is what I was thinking about Fujifilm. I kept posting this remark, I was always shut down.
Fuji has FIVE lines now. Olympus has three OMD and some PEN lines... Not sure how many total. Probably a few too many.
So far, great!
My 2 cents, Fuji.
- Never go full frame- Don't go plastic- Strategize somehow so bodies, lenses too, maintain resale value. My old X-E1 kit, one year old, is only worth half now.
Tonio Loewald: So it's like Detroit with nicer landscape?
I'd pick Romania over Detroit anytime.
arhmatic: Romania is heaven compared to Detroit!
And it definitely has more sunny days per year than London or even San Francisco, CA... Having lived in all three places, I am positive about it.
Romania is heaven compared to Detroit!
Oh, adobe is still around?Thank you, Adobe...
The side by side comparison tells everything... A little more finesse, Nikon.
Thanks preview for continuing to cover the Adobe fiasco.
I am here for the comments, as usual. Quality entertainment.Not even bothering to read the article.
mgblack74: For a relatively smart group of people here, there sure are a bunch of nitpicky morons. Jesus.
Smart? Nikon thinks otherwise.
Nikon is really testing our intelligence with this.
What do you expect? Dear Jesus...
Nikon had all this history and great precedents, it still got it wrong.
Ugly. Clunky...More subtle retro...A little more finesse please...
Fuji it is for me, still...
Dave Luttmann: This ain't no FE2 or F3 in size. Clunky, fat, darn shame. Glad I moved to Fuji
Fuji it is for me.
Too clunky. A little more style and finesse, please...
Video?I don't need it personally, but it's a freebie, so why not?You can never know when you need it?
What is hard to believe is some users think that having video will somehow magivally cripple their cameras. Nonsense....
Almost right...Nikon got the basics in place. All it needs is a little finesse. More refinement. A little smaller too...
joexu: That is pretty big, just a DSLR with retro looks. Would've preferred a mirrorless FF
right... just when I thought Nikon was starting to get it...
nevermind, back to Fuji.