Nice controls... ISO, exposure compensation, white balance.
Apple and iPhone, I know you are not going to change, but it's worth considering...
Oh... the eternal Fujifilm problem. 2-4 month delay seems to be standard here.
I don't see Fujifilm making any changes to the hardware at this point. There might be tweaks to the software, which can be done via firmware, but it's fair to assume that the hardware is probably the same... I am sure a good number of cameras have already been manufactured, why not ship those?
This is serious video improvement over the previous 16mp x-trans! Great Fuji. Pleasantly surprised how it stands against Sony or Panasonic.
Now if they can only deliver the camera as promised, on time...
Motors break. Lenses will not be supported forever. Fewer motors (or none) is the only way, IMHO. Mount yes, but there is always an adapter. Motors, not that much.
I am always more comfortable investing in old Nikkor lenses, where aperture and focus is all manual. I'll never buy anything with focus by wire". This is really the opposite of timeless IMO.
onlooker: Tiny electric motors and "forever" do not go together in the same sentence.
Ditch motors, or at least the focus by wire thing, and make them all mechanic. This should apply to all lens makers.
"forever"? ditch the focus by wire, typical, ALL lens makers. Do all mechanical. The only way to make them forever.
The reality is, -this wire thing might break anytime. Might not be supported in 2-3 decades...-compatibility is an issue. How can I use my Sony lens if suddenly I want to get a body from different maker? Adapters don't work. Make them all mechanical, so we can at least focus.
The reality is, my old, 1970s Nikkor works on my Fujifilm like a charm. All manual. Fujiflm on Nikon? Never. Not that I'd need that, but just a thought... Again, do all mechanical (manual or autofocus, your choice) then it's at least a step towards "forever".
Brian Isaman: Something tells me we are going to see endless articles about the A6300 from DPR staff. Get ready for the hyperbole.
Something tells me we are going to see endless articles about cameras here.../
It would be useful to see photos of the camera as it sits next to other objects.
Could be anything. Other cameras, phones, pencils, coffee cups etc.
Best way to understand the actual size of the object.
Great to see the gps included. This should really be standard everywhere. But LOL at the bump design. Wasn't there really any other place to put it?
webrunner5: The damned thing doesn't even have a handgrip! Maybe they could stick another knob on the front to make up for it. God knows it needs about 6 more knobs and dials.
What where they thinking??
@Bhima78 - and no hand grip AT ALL? damn those leicas...
Why is this news everywhere? BBC picked it up. dpreview now... Too many news outlets, photo-related or not, are giving attention to this. Next thing we know the guy is a rockstar. Just like media giving Trump attention for being controversial. This is just free publicity for a dumb subject. What good could ever come out of this?
Chris Noble: We can all agree that most photographers care about how their cameras look. But we can disagree reasonably on what is an attractive camera. Some of us see the Pen-F as a unimaginative attempt at a "retro" look, including illogically-placed controls, fake surfaces and handling compromises.
A comparative article with more than one point of view on the aesthetics of various cameras would be interesting. We already know from the flood of DPR adulation that the writer representing alternative aesthetics will have to be found outside the DPR office.
I second that. Even more, some photographers are willing to sacrifice ergonomics, to some extent - for better look at better portability.
nerd2: Nice looking toy with tiny sensor.
Cameras are toys, accept that. And we are amateurs doing this for fun. Unless you are a pro and make a living out of this. Which is really no more than 1% of us, really. So let's put away the "wants" and be realistic about what our "needs" really are.
Retro or not - this is irrelevant. I do appreciate Fujifilm and Olympus for joining Leica and understanding that quality design is a good selling point. "retro" is subjective, but what is universally appealing is quality, compactness, portability.
What for? Why add bulk for no reason. It's light.
I haven't heard anyone ditching Leica for lack of handgrip, even if they are a little heavier.
arhmatic: I would't call this "retro-styling". It's the "natural-styling" - because this is really the size and feel a camera should have. It happens to look retro, true. Well done, both Olympus and Fujifilm.
Yes. There are some facts/specs, but otherwise most of what we state here are opinions...
arhmatic: The marketing photos definitely look sharp. Would it be fair to assume that all the silvery looking parts at exterior are indeed metal?
Jeff, great! Plastic with metal paint on top is not allright... This goes beyond personal preference or durability concerns. It's about being true to the material. The way to create a timeless piece of engineering.
The marketing photos definitely look sharp. Would it be fair to assume that all the silvery looking parts at exterior are indeed metal?
I would't call this "retro-styling". It's the "natural-styling" - because this is really the size and feel a camera should have. It happens to look retro, true. Well done, both Olympus and Fujifilm.
snapa: That HAS to be one one the ugliest cameras ever made. At least they did finally make a much better sensor with some great handling. It also does have very nice IQ and low light capability! Too bad they are asking so much for it.
It's not. Their design is quite appealing. Probably the second reason I got into this brand.