//harishvaradhan, here is your opportunity to *apologise* for your blatant voting fraud.//
The International Cricket players were caught having ties with bookies and cooking games/matches. The players caught were primarily Mohammed Azharuddin (Indian cricket captain) & Hansei Cronje (South African Cricket captain). While Hansei Cronje confessed, *aplogized* and wept during investigation, Mohammed Azharuddin declared that he was targetted for being a minority (muslim). At the end, All SouthAfrican players that involved in match fixing were fired along with Hansei Cronje. On the other hand Mohammed Azharuddin continued as captain of India and he fired all the whistle blowers out of Indian team and kept frauds with him. Azharuddin became Member of Parliament later.
Do you still believe Indians will honstly agree their mistakes and apologize? Being honest = suicide in India. and I am a zombie.
it is not "young boy in a festival". It is a "boy performing actor in festival"
may be cheating.. :-) but she is really hot!! I think this photo should win first
It is normal for Indian people to cheat. I am Indian, I have Indian passport. I am being disliked by lot of Indian friends because I am honest.
Indians understood, being dishonest and crook means business, money, success, happiness. I have witnessed 90% of Indian girls don't marry grooms that are honest.
Indian ruling congress party govt. is totally dishonest. They did scam over scam over scam and people no longer get shocked or bothered any more when new scams come. FBI confirmed and notified to CBI ( = FBI of India) that, terrorist girl named Ishrat Jahan who was previously encountered and killed in India was a fiadeen (assassin). (in mission to kill opposition party Chief Minister Mr. Modi). But Indian ruling congress party president Sonia Gandhi (an Italian) is saying CM Mr. Modi fakely encountered a innocent female kid of minority (muslim) people.
From the above para, you can see that India is Banana Republic & Indians are inherently cheaters. I am odd man out.
amazing photo.. extraordinary details for a small sensor camera... great...
forpetessake: I'm not sure the lens on the long end is usable at all, it's equivalent to 1056mm f/40 in FF format. With such a dim lens even in best sunny day one has to use high ISO, slow shutter and will get a lot of noise and smeared action.
It is true that 'depth of field' is just like f/40 in FF. But since sensor is six times smaller, six times less light is sufficient for same iso; so speed is same anyway. So no need to boost iso.
klavrack: It should sell well to folks that want DSLR capabilities w/o the weight. On the other hand, we Pentaxians would like to point out the K-30 as a great alternative. From our biased perspective, it's a much more capable camera w/o many relative weaknesses. Good for Canon, though, if it puts pressure on everyone else--competition benefits buyers of all brands.
Klavrack,Sure Pentax is super good 'camera'. But lens? If pentax has fast focussing, not expensive lenses, esp tele-zoom I will buy them
Can some experienced photog advise me please?
Compared to T5i, what are the DISadvantages this one has?
If attached with Sigma100-300 F4 or Canon 100-400 L , will the light weight cause harder handling than heavier T5i due to imbalance?
thanksJay ( out of focus)
DenisBBergeron: At my eyes, the 7.3 give less moiré and more sharp rendering and on my screen I don't see any difference on colors in theses jpeg.
see the 'Washington' board. 7.3 looks light green letters while 7.4 looks white .
1/60th of second cannot produce this kind fire work movement
Main aim of purchasing a super zoom is "super zoom" . i.e tele end. But why do you never compare how a tele-distant photos from fz200 etc with the camera being tested?
In short distance, anyway the mediocre since too many lens involved in super zoom.
AngryCorgi: "The Speed Booster also promises sharper images compared to using the lens with a simple adapter."
That claim makes zero sense. If you are going to spread out ALL of the glass of a FF lens, the center may get sharper, but now you are using the edge glass too, and that is generally a weak point in FF lenses. You've effectively removed the "sweet spot" effect of cropped sensors w/ FF lenses.
Not necessarily. Widening does not decrease center's sharpness, it just adds center sharpness + with edge softness. i.e. it is increase in detail.
Ajit Negandhi,The photo is mean spirited and with fraudulent claim, and the description "yoga" is irrelevant here. This has nothing to do with yoga.
jaykumarr: I am not very confident that Fuji's efforts in research and development and inventions are very fruitful in their end product due to poor quality control. White Orb Issues, Too much CAs, jpeg artifacts, soft except for "cluster line patterns" in photos are sporadically present in Fuji cameras. But, though inferior in spec. sheet Panasonic, Canon cameras deliver better output.
I hope/drool fuji delivers good output overall and nail the coffin of other bridge cameras. But I insist fuji to concentrate more in output quality than the fantasies of out of world inventions.
great shot.. using great lens
I am not very confident that Fuji's efforts in research and development and inventions are very fruitful in their end product due to poor quality control. White Orb Issues, Too much CAs, jpeg artifacts, soft except for "cluster line patterns" in photos are sporadically present in Fuji cameras. But, though inferior in spec. sheet Panasonic, Canon cameras deliver better output.
Why is this not a FZ-xx camera, but LZ camera?
excellent shot with amazing bokeh, i did not know this inexpensive lens is sharp!!
Grobb: In the studio scene comparison shots the FZ150 look MUCH sharper and clearer to my eye in both JPEG and RAW to my eye. Is anyone else seeing what I am seeing?
me too. But Some people in pany forum were bragging their FZ200 was sharper than FZ150, while I did not see any improvement in FZ200. This photos prove the same.