stdavid: Munro the Americans were at war. Terrorism is a much different matter. It was a terrible decision to drop those bombs. I totaly agree. But lets not forget the Japanese were masters of terrorism. Just google the"The Rape of Nankin" that took place in 1937 in which the Japanese slaughtered 300,000 of the 600,000 residents of that city in six weeks. And..there was NO war.
Ok, could you please explain, Why America sent the biggest war ship then 'USS Enterprise' to nuke India in December 11, 1971 supporting Islamic Republic of Pakistan? Was India Terrorizing US by attacking pearl harbor?http://www.npr.org/2013/09/29/226578486/how-two-brothers-waged-a-secret-world-war-in-the-1950s American pride
hrt: The only way we can possibly learn to stop wars is to know about the disasters, cruelty and sorrows of war - and photography is indeed a powerful media for spreading that knowledge around the world. From this standpoint, I don't really get the idea of auctioning Nagasaki photos for an individual's ownership.All such photos should be shared publicly to remind us possible insanities of our species.
http://www.npr.org/2013/09/29/226578486/how-two-brothers-waged-a-secret-world-war-in-the-1950s American pride
Smeggypants: One of the world's most extreme acts of terrorism. We should never forget so that such a repulsive act never happens again!!!
Johannes Zander: Act of Genocide!Oh now, since it was the US it must be an humanitarian act of libaration in the name of freedom.
mauijohn: The japanese plan after they occupied the Philippines is to mine all the natural resources of the entire island of the Philipines such as copper, gold, timber, iron etc. They will use the people of the Philippines to work manually young and old and they just killed those too weak to work. Japan has a very low on those natural resources on their land. I will called this big time terrorism that will look Boko Haram and alquida combined like a chiken.
I wanted to type 'Do you know', but it was a typo. Even if I do not know English, I am not inferior as you think. Knowing English is another language. Only a racist will think English knowledge is great and those don't have it are inferior race.
Indians have castes openly for 2000 years. But Indians did not kill lower caste people. Whites claim 'non racists'. But they killed millions of people. Until 1970s Whites had law in Australia to steal children from Aborigines since Aborigines cannot bring up kids like 'white men' and practiced it even after 1970. (probably whites wanted to bring up kids as blood thirsty racists, which natives don't do)
Your Ph.D is ass wipe, because you call a even a Nobel prize winner as 'negro'.
Well, your points are not germane. Answer these:1) Why America sent warship to nuke India in 1972? Did India do Pearl Harbor?2) India has elaborate system to help lowercastes. 50% jobs are reserved for lower caste people. What do you have for blacks in US?
Stan LS, Yes, biggest democracy in the world. We don't call our president negro. You do. Don't you know a police chief did it last month? shame on you whites
caver3d , I hold masters degree in mathematics from reputed University. So calling me moron shows your stupidity.If you have brain, tell me what point I told was historically wrong. I will prove it.
Cursing shows your inability.
Do you Dulles? Do you remember airport named after him?He did war on helpless countries for money and killed thousands of people. America did not just help him but made him a hero.Do you know India? it is a country in Asia. Biggest democracy in the universe. Before US gave even voting rights to Blacks, Indian parliament had women, had representatives, ministers of lowest society. US sent the biggest warship in history to nuke India, Because US loved Islamist Pakistan and supported Muslim fundamentalists killing kind Hindus.I am not against US, actually I love US, but hate astraying information like what you give.
what? red paint ? or blood? how this happened?
anyway, this is great photo
:-) is this real? amazing photo..
By the way, is SP 150-600 resolving better than canon 100-400? Do you have comparison of something like moon photo taken with both?
jaykumarr: Say, you need to take photo of your teeth and send it to dentist on vacation or photo of something else to some other expert, then these 'refocus-able' camera is a boon. I think this is damn good for medical and science fields.
Else, not a great tool for the price.
graybalanced,//If you don't have a 3D camera and you want to show the dentist a picture of your teeth, you DON'T want the Lytro camera because only a small slice will be in focus// You are out of your mind. The only person more out of his/her mind in this world is the person who liked your comment.
jaykumarr: Amazon is a seller. Amazon owns DPreview.com.
That explain why every possible consumable item that has Camera appears in DPreview.com.
Soon, DPreview.com will review or preview Hard disks (that can store photos), printers (that can print photos) as long as they are sell/list -able in Amazon.com
I said what i said in a 'general' idea not specific to this article. I feel that dpreview is publishing too much news and I am addicted to their news.
Amazon is a seller. Amazon owns DPreview.com.
it is a kat
Sdaniella: not impressed: faux-miniature fx is a gimmick of thin-dof, which in fact was a flaw of doing the very opposite: that of trying to make miniatures look life-size with infinite dof (difficult to achieve for macros) at least in the old days when tiny apertured lenses were impractical or impossible with slow films, and wider apertures meant thinner dof was a given: folks making model scales like to super-impose models against life-size context surroundings, but rarely succeeded till faster film came along, or knew how to use tilt-shift lens with focal planes tilted the other way for deep to infinite dof.
i.e.try super-imposing an ant or bee so it looks truly gigantic surrounded by a real city (without any cut/paste photoshop cheats)
or try a macro that doesn't suffer classic thin-dof (=extremely unrealistic; no real context, all blurred out)
Mustafa,What you said was like a prophet saying 4 wives are better than 1 and those not agreed will go to hell Or go to a doctor.
While the wide angle is appropriate, the narrow dof is pointless from the beginning to end of the video. It is actually pain.
Say, you need to take photo of your teeth and send it to dentist on vacation or photo of something else to some other expert, then these 'refocus-able' camera is a boon. I think this is damn good for medical and science fields.
Half of the 'conclusions - cons' can be addressed by firmware updates.
jaykumarr: Well done Olympus.. Terrific.. Don't care about doomsters who say it won't work because 1/2.3 small sensor. You made smaller OMD sensor jpeg output to defeat the sensor of mighty 7D!!. If this 50x lens has fast AF and precise focus, this will be the best ultrazoom camera for wild life.
Donald Chin,You are being a Nikon fanboy, I guess you would have appreciated if the same camera was made by Nikon. What do you think?
As you advised, i compared Nikon 1" sensors output with OMD-5. And there was no comparison. Nikon 1" was way too inferior.
Donald Chin,go here and compare with the camera that came AFTER OMD 5 and reviewed 4 months after OMD-5: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canon-eos-650d-rebel-t4i/24
Olympus is far superior in jpeg output. It is not me, but dpreview says that.
I don't know what is your problem with olympus, but the OMD-5 s jpeg output is as good as 24 MP Nikons output.