marc petzold: Nice Info about that particular picture background, i was happy to read it,more of that, please. That composition looks very good to my eyes.
Apart from that, the Canon 16-35 L II Lens wasn't that good reviewed at lenstip, for example:
Canon EF 16-35 mm f/2.8L II USM11. Summary
solid, sealed barrel, excellent image quality in the frame centre, chromatic aberration sensibly controlled, only slight distortion, taking into account the focal lengths range, low astigmatism, low vignetting level, very quick, silent and accurate autofocus, lens hood and a case included.
unacceptable image quality at frame edge in the aperture range from f/2.8-4.0, average work against bright light, bad price/quality ratio.
Simple would have been more beautiful....
yonsarh: Recenlty I took a trip to Asia with my sony dslrt camera and I must say it was very heavy to carry around 2 lenses with me. My DSLR was heavy and I left my camera in my room and start to take my picture with my smartphone. although dslr gives you fine image quality, but, finally ended up buying a cheap compact.
I agree, sold my nikon DSLR and got me a nice point and shoot... Ricoh GRdigital 3
Why buy a Panasonic LX100 when you could buy a GX7?
i could buy an GX7 but i dont want one..... and i dont need one....
Canon is goin to annouce that they are goin into the washing machine business
i dont know which one to vote for........... im still using and enjoying my nikon D70s and D200....... call it old....... but it still gives me good pictures and has been my companions since 2005dont have the money to buy a new dslrdont want big mega pixel dslr.....im happy with 6 and 10 megapixels.......so i guess my vote still goes with what i have on hand.....