unbelievable

unbelievable

Lives in Netherlands Netherlands
Joined on Feb 8, 2012

Comments

Total: 5, showing: 1 – 5
On Confessions of a camera snob post (90 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ivan Lietaert: I have the same feeling expressed by others: in this 'subtle', devient, fiendish way, this article suggests the iPhone is the only portable device that allows to take decent pictures - which is clearly untrue.

In your article all words with possitive connotation are about the iPhone, while all words with negative connotation (eg 'lacked'; 'high light clipping' etc) are in the paragraphs about smartphones.

Funny how you don't realise that in the long rung your biased apprauch undermines the credibility of the author AND of Connect and dpreview...

Mmh, an individual apparently reads what an individual wishes to read.

( No I don't have an iPhone and will never have one either )

Direct link | Posted on Mar 15, 2013 at 12:31 UTC
On Confessions of a camera snob post (90 comments in total)

What a true joy to read this article with fascinating photo's, thanks!

( I like using the 1:1 format on the XZ1 as well. Gives a certain touch to the photo.)

Direct link | Posted on Mar 15, 2013 at 11:33 UTC as 26th comment
In reply to:

unbelievable: Seems that the major improvements over the XZ-1 are operational:
- (Most likely) much faster performance due to new engine.
- User interface seems to have become stellar with the hybrid control ring and the function buttons. Changing settings in the XZ-1 is not really a joy or really not a joy

920K screen over 640K screen is a further improvement. That it is tilting is a not essential bonus imo.

Image wise I'm wondering whether there will be a real improvement, shifting from a 10 MP CCD to a 12MP CMOS. The image quality of the XZ-1 is already a joy.

Downside is that it increased its weight by 30% and that the file-size is most likely larger.

I sincerely hope that they improved the mechanism/software to manually "capture/set" the white balance setting in a low light environment. That works 100 times better on the Panasonic LX3.
Of course you can should only raw, but I prefer nice looking jpegs straight out of the camera

Pity they did not make it slightly wider .... 24mm?

@Francis
Not entirely. The (even brighter) Panasonic LX7 (with 1/1.7") starts at 24mm (but stops at 90).

The LX3 (2008) also started at 24mm, but (unfortunately) stopped at 60mm

I fully agree though that 22.5 would be even nicer... ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2012 at 19:56 UTC

It will be equipped with a patent lawsuit ...

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2012 at 17:41 UTC as 44th comment

Seems that the major improvements over the XZ-1 are operational:
- (Most likely) much faster performance due to new engine.
- User interface seems to have become stellar with the hybrid control ring and the function buttons. Changing settings in the XZ-1 is not really a joy or really not a joy

920K screen over 640K screen is a further improvement. That it is tilting is a not essential bonus imo.

Image wise I'm wondering whether there will be a real improvement, shifting from a 10 MP CCD to a 12MP CMOS. The image quality of the XZ-1 is already a joy.

Downside is that it increased its weight by 30% and that the file-size is most likely larger.

I sincerely hope that they improved the mechanism/software to manually "capture/set" the white balance setting in a low light environment. That works 100 times better on the Panasonic LX3.
Of course you can should only raw, but I prefer nice looking jpegs straight out of the camera

Pity they did not make it slightly wider .... 24mm?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2012 at 17:18 UTC as 10th comment | 6 replies
Total: 5, showing: 1 – 5