Great shot, with fast AF, a Canon shot
oselimg: Another exercise by Dpreview to get more clicks so they can get more advertisers in. Unfortunately that's the internet publishing for you. Ooops I've just done it too. :-)
RichardBalonglong: I see three kinds of people here in the comments section:1) One who bashes the camera2) One who bashes the photographer who used the camera3) One who bashes other comments
Where is DXO dynamic range test fits in?18.104.22.168.1Its all it talks about over this forum
Yep, they are called useless gear heads!Not happy with their life!I'm happy for Olympus to make some nice products!
flysurfer: Okay, let me summarize what I have gathered so far:
You used the old X-Pro1 to eliminate the Lens Modulation Optimizer (LMO), you used Capture One to replace Fuji's colors with a dull default conversion, and you turned off RAW metadata based(!) CA correction, distortion correction and devignetting in Capture One (which is all part of the overall lens design). And then you sometimes used shutter speeds without a tripod that sometimes resulted camera shake and blur.
So how "real-world" are these samples after all? Because in my "real world", I certainly use my lenses as intended, with LMO, on a tripod (when necessary), and I certainly don't turn off any lens corrections that are a part of the lens firmware (and stored in the RAW metadata). I also don't use C1's default conversion.
Well if you look at the pics they are pretty sharp.I have use the Fuji XE2 at 1/30 and had great results, not always, but they are keepers for sure, it depends if you have steady hands and no heartbeat problems :)I am sure he will do some pics to fancy your taste and needs.
HowaboutRAW: Which Fuji body?
Would be interesting to see the differences between XTrans and Bayer.
Please dont shoot in jpegs, when you post process it has tons of posterisation
helmus: It would have been better to have someone who can handle an X-Pro1 and this lens. This "tester" could not do it, quite obvious not ...
I like what I see, for once the shots looks refreshing.Did you like shooting with it?What are the pros and the cons?Thx Samuel
If it can shut up a few activists here, i'll be real happy :)
Sdaniella: whilst Canon EOS 5Ds/5DsR address ultra-high 50 mp shooting limited in good low light, like Nikon D8## series, or Sony FF, with 36mp
meanwhile, the rest of us hi-20mp low light FF shooters (less interested in 30+mp) await Canon's update for its 1080p 5DMkIII to a 5DMkIV aimed at low light and/or 4k Cine, or both ...
I hope: Manual Exposure control HDR video/cine/stills: while keeping it within 20-30 mp range, and up the fps to 7-10 fps will be fine, include 1.6x and 1.3x crop fov modes, too
if 5Ds/5DsR do 50mp x 5fps = 250mp/s with two DiG!C 6 processors, we could conservatively extrapolate 5DMkIV, to be:
11 fps, if 22mp10 fps, if 25mp8 fps, if 30 mpetc
I understand, I used to own a canon 60D, i think it had a tilt screen.But for me , cause i am older I prefer not having a tilt screen, I will get on my knees, and make some bad pics and have to redo much more,,but like i said i really like to keep it as pure as possible.i own a fuji Xe2 and love the way it looks.Just preferencesTake care
Picturenaut: Wow, 2020 comments, now this looks like a posting record on DPR. This is comment 2021:1-2-3-4, oh Lord, gimme more MP, gimme more DR, and more FPS - and don't forget 40K video, 'cause I can't get no, I can't get no satisfaction ;-).
hahahaha!True, lots of comments!
I just hate the fact that its not part of the camera, its stands out.Like the D750, what a horrible camera with the tilt screen.That its my preference, I know some like the swivel screen,I rather get to my knee and shoot than having a ugly screen.Just my preference!!!!
Yeah, the 5D4 would be fun, but no tilt screen PLEASE
mpgxsvcd: When Canon speaks, everyone cringes.
That was a funny one, even if i shoot Canon, i like that line.Well, they are waking up, it takes time to come with new technology, i have hear the the manufacture was crippled because of the earthquake and they had to start from scratch....That was a bad one
caravan: Why so much hate for this remarkable new camera? There are still plenty of options available for those who do not want,need,or lack the skills needed to get outstanding results from this awesome new product.
i only been shooting for 4 years!
Its a Nikon forum over here, did not you realize it?What they want it to get the Canon shooter to go on their side, it seem that a few gullible ones are catching the bait.
Sannaborjeson: So it is not actually a replacement for 5DIII.Are they going to introduce 5DIV or something like that?
Agree, Canon has a real gem so far, compared to the 5D3.It will give them a new direction to follow.Lots a people are jalous about the Canon stuff, poor them
bronxbombers4: "As far as dynamic range is concerned, we're told that the new 5DS and 5DS R should give the same performance as the current EOS 5D Mark III."
Jeez this thing costs more than a 5D3 and is actually worse than the 5D3 in most regards and barely better in any!
It appears to have the same DR and SNR (only maybe actually worse?) as the 5D3 but WORSE fps, WORSE movie image quality, WORSE movie audio quality, far worse movie image quality and usability features than a 5D3 with ML!
All it has over the 5D3 are 2x the MP for more reach and beter metering!!!!
Jeez, I guess Nikon here I come, as incredibly badly as I don't want to give up Canon lenses and UI.
What the heck has happened to Canon management over the last decade???????
Joseph dont reply to those who are trashing Canon gear.They feel protective of their investment, it a lot of money for them, so they have to think they bought the best, let them have their fun, by the way this camera is not even out, and they are trashing it, i think there is a lot of people who dont have anything to do on saturday nights, they ought to go in clubs and get a woman, or a life
Earth Art: Dang guys!
Stop hurting Canon's feelings. They might just stop making cameras because of the ridicule. Corporations need to be praised and pampered or they just don't have the will to live (aka make ship loads of cash)
The Davinator: Increased rez with anemic dynamic range and banding. Fail
I do pics professionnaly to and i dont need it at all.All the fuss about this is for a certain crowd, and I doubt it the dpreview crowd.....very much.I am happy you have a lot of cameras, for myself i have enough of my gear, hut ai never ever talk bout other peoples gear, and even less when its not even on the market