crashpc

crashpc

Lives in Czech Republic Prague, Czech Republic
Works as a Technician
Joined on Sep 29, 2007

Comments

Total: 120, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Dat feel when you hold EOS M and $1000 in your hands... :-D

Direct link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 15:57 UTC as 385th comment
On article Readers' Showcase: Rob Kearney (76 comments in total)
In reply to:

GaryJP: Whenever I see someone superficially badmouthing another photographer's works here I almost always immediately go to check their gallery.

95% of the time they have uploaded nothing.

And no links to their work either.

You don´t realize how low did you get, do you?
I might trash someones work. That happens, people don´t like someones work from time to time.

My logic still holds: You haven´t seen any work of tese, yet you trash "whole people" based on no evidence. You are even more negative and rude creature. Enjoy yourself! :-)

Direct link | Posted on Jan 17, 2016 at 09:47 UTC
On article Readers' Showcase: Rob Kearney (76 comments in total)
In reply to:

GaryJP: Whenever I see someone superficially badmouthing another photographer's works here I almost always immediately go to check their gallery.

95% of the time they have uploaded nothing.

And no links to their work either.

I´d bet that more than half of DPR users don´t have anything in their galeries. So it´s like "I bet that when I drop a stone, it will fall down". What a discovery! :-)

Direct link | Posted on Jan 16, 2016 at 14:27 UTC
In reply to:

crashpc: Grrrr, and where is Canon? :-D

Yes. Slug mode preinstalled as a prevention to -add whatever you think about -.
They would still make me buy it if it had significantly better image sensor. Something like full color, or 36Mpx with no more noise. That would make me jump. Just for macro/reach abilities.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 19:19 UTC
In reply to:

crashpc: Grrrr, and where is Canon? :-D

And where is EOS M4 ?
:-)

Direct link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 16:42 UTC

Grrrr, and where is Canon? :-D

Direct link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 15:35 UTC as 17th comment | 5 replies
On article Readers' Showcase: Rob Kearney (76 comments in total)
In reply to:

GaryJP: Whenever I see someone superficially badmouthing another photographer's works here I almost always immediately go to check their gallery.

95% of the time they have uploaded nothing.

And no links to their work either.

There is more than slight difference between not underrstanding and disagreeing, which you didn't manage to see yet. Your claim is right, but it has no usable valie in it.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 04:26 UTC
On article Readers' Showcase: Rob Kearney (76 comments in total)
In reply to:

GaryJP: Whenever I see someone superficially badmouthing another photographer's works here I almost always immediately go to check their gallery.

95% of the time they have uploaded nothing.

And no links to their work either.

Absolutely. The same nonsense. Some dogs are white. Therefore all dogs are white. This gives me headache.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 14, 2016 at 14:15 UTC
On article Readers' Showcase: Rob Kearney (76 comments in total)
In reply to:

GaryJP: Whenever I see someone superficially badmouthing another photographer's works here I almost always immediately go to check their gallery.

95% of the time they have uploaded nothing.

And no links to their work either.

Then I appologize to You. It was not apparent to me. It´s not always easy to see for who is the answer, because all those answers are stacked like "one behind another one".

Direct link | Posted on Jan 12, 2016 at 16:56 UTC
On article Readers' Showcase: Rob Kearney (76 comments in total)
In reply to:

GaryJP: Whenever I see someone superficially badmouthing another photographer's works here I almost always immediately go to check their gallery.

95% of the time they have uploaded nothing.

And no links to their work either.

If you got your answer right, it´s very simple then. I comment because I´m the one being critisized for not valid argument. You don´t see my photos, therefore I´m worse photograher? Logic 101 and math 101 broke down... :-)
You didn´t see my anything, therefore I´m worse in EVERYTHING. Whoa. What an assessment.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 12, 2016 at 16:29 UTC
On article Nikon fills in the blanks on professional grade D5 DSLR (554 comments in total)
In reply to:

Tazz93: 3 million ISO...

No, not really. Remember these younger DSLRs ending at ISO1600, which was very usable with good lens. Now we have ISO 25k and 50k in Canon devices, and sure it is not that good as ISO1600 - the highest setting - was. The same can be here. They simply can go "down" with acceptable quality. It's better to have something than nothing (save for 240x320px and smaller output.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 21:19 UTC
In reply to:

tkbslc: And now there is almost no reason for superzoom lenses for DSLR and mirrorless to exist. Pending some reviews on lens quality, I'm pretty excited about this one.

sure! That´s why I´m saying. With nicer sensor, it will have not only more reach with awesome sharpness, therefore killing this panny in this single aspect. But this Panny is still very, very good piece of hardware. Hopefully the lens will be okay.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 20:13 UTC
On article Nikon fills in the blanks on professional grade D5 DSLR (554 comments in total)
In reply to:

Tazz93: 3 million ISO...

Keytsa: I feel PWNT :-D

Direct link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 20:10 UTC
In reply to:

tkbslc: And now there is almost no reason for superzoom lenses for DSLR and mirrorless to exist. Pending some reviews on lens quality, I'm pretty excited about this one.

Haha, well, if Canon makes some suitable sensor (which we know it doesn´t) for its super sharp 55-250mm IS STM lens, it will not be that bad competition ruining it, but it´s still very good. I like what I see.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 20:01 UTC

Do you see that Canon? That´s how it´s done...

Direct link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 19:57 UTC as 24th comment | 1 reply
On article Inching forward? Canon PowerShot G5 X review posted (386 comments in total)

Well, performance of G7X is at least understandable. This one is pathetic. Is really Canon being the sinking ship? It looks like that to me! I really stared to panic (with Canon gear).

Direct link | Posted on Dec 14, 2015 at 20:09 UTC as 101st comment
On article Readers' Showcase: Rob Kearney (76 comments in total)
In reply to:

GaryJP: Whenever I see someone superficially badmouthing another photographer's works here I almost always immediately go to check their gallery.

95% of the time they have uploaded nothing.

And no links to their work either.

Well, good critics is not a problem, even from nonphotographers or these who don´t share their stuff. I keep all my stuff secret or directly changed for money. No leaks :-) Am I worse at my job? errrrr, no....

I liked some pictures, but so far this gallery really seems to be weakest one ever, posted on DPR (in my eyes). This is not neccessarily bad thing, but not good either.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 14, 2015 at 17:43 UTC
On article Sony Cyber-shot RX1R II added to studio test scene (211 comments in total)

Not sure if I buy that "flat scene issue" for all situations. Frim this aov, it looks like even EOS M is competition with 22mm pancake, sharpnes wise.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 18, 2015 at 20:07 UTC as 55th comment
In reply to:

Zoron: Phone camera sensor unlikely to get to 1", that's too big for a phone......the direction is to get thinner not thicker........saving grace for cameramakers

Nobody ever tried that with good feature set and large capacity accu. I bet closest device is THL 5000. It sells quite well for what it is, and this message is written by that device. Gets me trough the mild working week wit ease.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 31, 2015 at 04:28 UTC
In reply to:

Zoron: Phone camera sensor unlikely to get to 1", that's too big for a phone......the direction is to get thinner not thicker........saving grace for cameramakers

1" - cropped multiaspect, with more WA lens, could make about usable medium thickness phone.
In fact, there is some market for "thicker than hair" phones, with serious power (4000+mAh accu), good ergonomics and good periferies. I put my 9mm thick phone into silicone cover, to make it thicker, because with all that rounded sides and edges, it feels too thin. Unusably thin. Phone is not just fashionable gadgetery for many.... Not only me would be happy with 5,5" FullHD device, with efficient quad core, 6000-9000mAh accu (so no powerbanks anymore) hair under 1/2" thick.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 30, 2015 at 17:15 UTC
Total: 120, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »