Dat feel when you hold EOS M and $1000 in your hands... :-D
GaryJP: Whenever I see someone superficially badmouthing another photographer's works here I almost always immediately go to check their gallery.
95% of the time they have uploaded nothing.
And no links to their work either.
You don´t realize how low did you get, do you?I might trash someones work. That happens, people don´t like someones work from time to time.
My logic still holds: You haven´t seen any work of tese, yet you trash "whole people" based on no evidence. You are even more negative and rude creature. Enjoy yourself! :-)
I´d bet that more than half of DPR users don´t have anything in their galeries. So it´s like "I bet that when I drop a stone, it will fall down". What a discovery! :-)
crashpc: Grrrr, and where is Canon? :-D
Yes. Slug mode preinstalled as a prevention to -add whatever you think about -. They would still make me buy it if it had significantly better image sensor. Something like full color, or 36Mpx with no more noise. That would make me jump. Just for macro/reach abilities.
And where is EOS M4 ?:-)
Grrrr, and where is Canon? :-D
There is more than slight difference between not underrstanding and disagreeing, which you didn't manage to see yet. Your claim is right, but it has no usable valie in it.
Absolutely. The same nonsense. Some dogs are white. Therefore all dogs are white. This gives me headache.
Then I appologize to You. It was not apparent to me. It´s not always easy to see for who is the answer, because all those answers are stacked like "one behind another one".
If you got your answer right, it´s very simple then. I comment because I´m the one being critisized for not valid argument. You don´t see my photos, therefore I´m worse photograher? Logic 101 and math 101 broke down... :-)You didn´t see my anything, therefore I´m worse in EVERYTHING. Whoa. What an assessment.
Tazz93: 3 million ISO...
No, not really. Remember these younger DSLRs ending at ISO1600, which was very usable with good lens. Now we have ISO 25k and 50k in Canon devices, and sure it is not that good as ISO1600 - the highest setting - was. The same can be here. They simply can go "down" with acceptable quality. It's better to have something than nothing (save for 240x320px and smaller output.
tkbslc: And now there is almost no reason for superzoom lenses for DSLR and mirrorless to exist. Pending some reviews on lens quality, I'm pretty excited about this one.
sure! That´s why I´m saying. With nicer sensor, it will have not only more reach with awesome sharpness, therefore killing this panny in this single aspect. But this Panny is still very, very good piece of hardware. Hopefully the lens will be okay.
Keytsa: I feel PWNT :-D
Haha, well, if Canon makes some suitable sensor (which we know it doesn´t) for its super sharp 55-250mm IS STM lens, it will not be that bad competition ruining it, but it´s still very good. I like what I see.
Do you see that Canon? That´s how it´s done...
Well, performance of G7X is at least understandable. This one is pathetic. Is really Canon being the sinking ship? It looks like that to me! I really stared to panic (with Canon gear).
Well, good critics is not a problem, even from nonphotographers or these who don´t share their stuff. I keep all my stuff secret or directly changed for money. No leaks :-) Am I worse at my job? errrrr, no....
I liked some pictures, but so far this gallery really seems to be weakest one ever, posted on DPR (in my eyes). This is not neccessarily bad thing, but not good either.
Not sure if I buy that "flat scene issue" for all situations. Frim this aov, it looks like even EOS M is competition with 22mm pancake, sharpnes wise.
Zoron: Phone camera sensor unlikely to get to 1", that's too big for a phone......the direction is to get thinner not thicker........saving grace for cameramakers
Nobody ever tried that with good feature set and large capacity accu. I bet closest device is THL 5000. It sells quite well for what it is, and this message is written by that device. Gets me trough the mild working week wit ease.
1" - cropped multiaspect, with more WA lens, could make about usable medium thickness phone.In fact, there is some market for "thicker than hair" phones, with serious power (4000+mAh accu), good ergonomics and good periferies. I put my 9mm thick phone into silicone cover, to make it thicker, because with all that rounded sides and edges, it feels too thin. Unusably thin. Phone is not just fashionable gadgetery for many.... Not only me would be happy with 5,5" FullHD device, with efficient quad core, 6000-9000mAh accu (so no powerbanks anymore) hair under 1/2" thick.