It seems to me that Kate Bevan's definition of art and photography are terribly narrow. Not every artist or photographer is trying to reproduce "realism". Where would we be if Picasso only stayed in his realism phase. Art and photography is about creativity. I don't go around counting pixels. Who cares?! I care about light, reflection, tones, shapes, color-pallete, etc. Kate should stick to writing about things she knows about. Art and photography don't seem to be one of them.