Kiril Karaatanasov: Weird why did Samsung mess up so bad?
screen...they barely got to parity with nex-5 the gel technology has benn in nex for quite some time now
Outdated viewfinder 800x600 what is this? Are we living in 2006?
The nx200 sensor brought again..why?
...and to top it all built in eye-fi card....only 8fps?
These are examples of DOA release. Samsung should bring someone from their phone division to manage the camera business.....
I can't see why one can complain about nx200 sensor? It is just great, and even perfect for the money!Before criticize smth or smb just try to understand, I mean wi-fi is an excellent and very useful feature.Then you talk about 8 fps, is not enough for you? You must be very crazy photographer who needs rather a video camera than a photocamera.
Yes, NX20 is definitely a big step ahead. I like all the features especially wifi, articulated screen, high res EVF. It does worth the money.
alexandru: Nokia, what about you start making a decent smartphone, one that works and doesn't need any marketing gimmicks to attract attention...like this ridiculous sensor.
It's embarrassing. Seriously. Stop it, fire everybody.
And you just stop whining.
Muhammad bilal: I want to ask question , i am confused because i want to buy a compact camea about the result of camera ,that nokia 808 produce better result than compact cameas like sony hx9v or other models?
Yest, because it has bigger sensor and excellent optics signed by Carl Zeiss.
Nokia 808 will be an excellent replacement to my P&S Sony TX9 and Galaxy S2 for a low price.
CMurdock: Judging from the sample images, this is ONE HORRIBLE CAMERA. Every image shows very bad smearing of detail, even the RAW images. Over the years I have seen DPR give the A-OK to dozens (if not hundreds) of bad images, and this review confirms that they don't know how to interpret what they are seeing. There are dozens of cameras out there that have better image quality than this.
I must say I've never seen such a dull comment.
I was waiting this review a very long time.I think you did a pretty objective review.Thanks!
Nokia 808 just gaved them up.
These cameras are dead born, because Nokia 808 outperforms them in IQ.
It is my dream phone.I could care it any ware I go, instead of "bulky" APS-C size Samsung NX10 :)Einstein was right everything is relative.
I can argue that this is a Kyrgyz hunter. Kyrgyz and Kazakh have the same look though, because they are both a fraternal nation.
I have an impression that this review in particular and Dreview in general have some kind of aversion when we talk about Samsung APS-C cameras. It looks like a discrimination with no reason.
Does it work with NX200?
So new Canon S100 seems to underperform.I compared S100, LX5, S95, with TL500(EX1), and "old" Samsung seems to provide better results in RAW and jpeg than others.
ageha: Wow, at high ISO even the E-P3 shows more details.
Don't lie, we are not blind.
Now with a new shot test, NX200's images looks even more sharper and crisp.
photo nuts: Looks good, similar to Sony NEX 5N and Panasonic G3. Samsung seems to implement mandatory in-camera RAW NR at ISO 6400, images are significantly softer than those at lower ISO levels.
They are not softer, just out of focus.
It's a joke?
rsf3127: Worse than NEX 5N and more expensive. No thanks.
What is the price of 50 F1.8?
I don't see any problem with that.Did you see color rendition on the palette?