Kuturgan

Kuturgan

Lives in France Grenoble, France
Joined on Jun 13, 2011

Comments

Total: 85, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Samsung releases 12MP EX2F 'Smart Camera' article (370 comments in total)
In reply to:

Rooru S: Not interested, but hope at least the Drive Dial is customizable to another function. Seems like a combination of S95, NEX-7 and RX100.

It is like you didn't ever seen EX1 before.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 4, 2012 at 22:44 UTC
In reply to:

rttew: Nokia: keep making failing phones that no one will buy from you.

I'll buy it. You are not everbody.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 21, 2012 at 02:45 UTC
On Samsung NX20: First Impressions article (83 comments in total)
In reply to:

ProfHankD: This is in several ways a step ahead of Sony NEX, but still misses on a lot of the basics. Samsung's been learning a lot from Sony; let's see if Sony can learn a little from Samsung and start to support the "connected camera" concepts... at least allowing USB tethered control (like they should have all along!).

No, you can check it on youtube, but you should know that it is only a Beta firmware.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 28, 2012 at 19:25 UTC
On Samsung NX20: First Impressions article (83 comments in total)
In reply to:

peevee1: Given the current price for Panasonic DMC-G3 ($618 with 14-42 lens), this should not cost more than $700 (for WiFi, although an EyeFi card solves this problem for Pana). But I bet Samsung will try to price it significantly more.

First, NX20 DMC-G3 are not at the same league (APS-C vs MFT)
Second, NX20's price is MSRP, and it is not on the market yet.
Third, NX 20 has a WiFi direct system which is not the same thing as a simple WiFi feature provided by a EyeFi card. With Wifi direct you dont need a WiFi router.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 28, 2012 at 19:21 UTC
On Samsung NX20: First Impressions article (83 comments in total)
In reply to:

Kiril Karaatanasov: Weird why did Samsung mess up so bad?

screen...they barely got to parity with nex-5 the gel technology has benn in nex for quite some time now

Outdated viewfinder 800x600 what is this? Are we living in 2006?

The nx200 sensor brought again..why?

...and to top it all built in eye-fi card....only 8fps?

These are examples of DOA release. Samsung should bring someone from their phone division to manage the camera business.....

I can't see why one can complain about nx200 sensor? It is just great, and even perfect for the money!
Before criticize smth or smb just try to understand, I mean wi-fi is an excellent and very useful feature.
Then you talk about 8 fps, is not enough for you? You must be very crazy photographer who needs rather a video camera than a photocamera.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 19, 2012 at 21:47 UTC
On Samsung NX20: First Impressions article (83 comments in total)

Yes, NX20 is definitely a big step ahead. I like all the features especially wifi, articulated screen, high res EVF. It does worth the money.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 19, 2012 at 21:42 UTC as 22nd comment
In reply to:

alexandru: Nokia, what about you start making a decent smartphone, one that works and doesn't need any marketing gimmicks to attract attention...like this ridiculous sensor.

It's embarrassing. Seriously. Stop it, fire everybody.

And you just stop whining.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 1, 2012 at 17:44 UTC
In reply to:

Muhammad bilal: I want to ask question , i am confused because i want to buy a compact camea about the result of camera ,that nokia 808 produce better result than compact cameas like sony hx9v or other models?

Yest, because it has bigger sensor and excellent optics signed by Carl Zeiss.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 1, 2012 at 17:40 UTC

Nokia 808 will be an excellent replacement to my P&S Sony TX9 and Galaxy S2 for a low price.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 29, 2012 at 10:19 UTC as 37th comment | 1 reply
On Just posted: Our Samsung NX200 in-depth review article (175 comments in total)
In reply to:

CMurdock: Judging from the sample images, this is ONE HORRIBLE CAMERA. Every image shows very bad smearing of detail, even the RAW images. Over the years I have seen DPR give the A-OK to dozens (if not hundreds) of bad images, and this review confirms that they don't know how to interpret what they are seeing. There are dozens of cameras out there that have better image quality than this.

I must say I've never seen such a dull comment.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 29, 2012 at 09:44 UTC
On Just posted: Our Samsung NX200 in-depth review article (175 comments in total)

I was waiting this review a very long time.
I think you did a pretty objective review.
Thanks!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 29, 2012 at 00:01 UTC as 29th comment

Nokia 808 just gaved them up.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 28, 2012 at 12:13 UTC as 34th comment

These cameras are dead born, because Nokia 808 outperforms them in IQ.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 28, 2012 at 12:10 UTC as 10th comment | 2 replies

It is my dream phone.
I could care it any ware I go, instead of "bulky" APS-C size Samsung NX10 :)
Einstein was right everything is relative.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 27, 2012 at 22:04 UTC as 180th comment

I can argue that this is a Kyrgyz hunter. Kyrgyz and Kazakh have the same look though, because they are both a fraternal nation.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 9, 2012 at 13:10 UTC as 1st comment
On Mirrorless Roundup 2011 article (429 comments in total)

I have an impression that this review in particular and Dreview in general have some kind of aversion when we talk about Samsung APS-C cameras. It looks like a discrimination with no reason.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 21, 2011 at 00:46 UTC as 51st comment
On DxO Labs announces Optics Pro 7 with faster performance article (167 comments in total)

Does it work with NX200?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 23, 2011 at 14:14 UTC as 56th comment | 7 replies

So new Canon S100 seems to underperform.
I compared S100, LX5, S95, with TL500(EX1), and "old" Samsung seems to provide better results in RAW and jpeg than others.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 20, 2011 at 17:02 UTC as 17th comment
In reply to:

ageha: Wow, at high ISO even the E-P3 shows more details.

Don't lie, we are not blind.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 10, 2011 at 19:54 UTC

Now with a new shot test, NX200's images looks even more sharper and crisp.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 10, 2011 at 11:21 UTC as 4th comment | 1 reply
Total: 85, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »