luchoh

Joined on Feb 10, 2012

Comments

Total: 2, showing: 1 – 2
In reply to:

luchoh: OM2 has the best viewfinder in 35mm.
This was the only object I carried with me on my wedding day. I shortly let go of it when I had to sign the papers. That's how good it is. The viewfinder is comparable to Pentax 6x7!

Olympus has the technology. Unfortunately it seems it is infested (as most of the surviving modern businesses) with sales and marketing people that have the upper hand over ingenuity.

I had given up on Olympus and for a short time regained hope when they pre-announced this camera. Perhaps I didn't read carefully to notice the m4/3 mount. Perhaps I couldn't believe they will so cheaply exploit the legacy...

Have you noticed how most of the old film gear has become twice as expensive during the past year or so (OM gear eve more so)? This is a direct consequence of marketing people trying to sell half-baked products to (as they think) half-baked people. Well, I hope not everybody is half-baked.

Farewell Olympus!

Image vs. Photograph
I can certainly see your point. As physics major and software engineer, I'm quite intimate with technology.
However, this is not the point I was making.
I agree that the images that the new camera will produce will be superior to anything produced by OM cameras except perhaps for slides scanned on a drum scanner. Even then, if the behind-the-scanner-device is not vastly experienced, the images will be inferior. Also, such scans will cost $40 and more per image.
I agree. Images from the new camera will be superior.
How about photographs?
I sold my 5D 3 years ago when it became obsolete - I realized l was using old school medium format and then subsequently large format and the 5D didn't get much use. The large viewfinders help you see your future work of art.

My point is: unless one shoots walls and compares pixels, the image quality doesn't matter all that much. What matters is what you see in order to create the photograph.

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2012 at 19:06 UTC

OM2 has the best viewfinder in 35mm.
This was the only object I carried with me on my wedding day. I shortly let go of it when I had to sign the papers. That's how good it is. The viewfinder is comparable to Pentax 6x7!

Olympus has the technology. Unfortunately it seems it is infested (as most of the surviving modern businesses) with sales and marketing people that have the upper hand over ingenuity.

I had given up on Olympus and for a short time regained hope when they pre-announced this camera. Perhaps I didn't read carefully to notice the m4/3 mount. Perhaps I couldn't believe they will so cheaply exploit the legacy...

Have you noticed how most of the old film gear has become twice as expensive during the past year or so (OM gear eve more so)? This is a direct consequence of marketing people trying to sell half-baked products to (as they think) half-baked people. Well, I hope not everybody is half-baked.

Farewell Olympus!

Link | Posted on Feb 10, 2012 at 02:24 UTC as 7th comment | 4 replies
Total: 2, showing: 1 – 2