KonstantinosK: And, ok, I have to say this: that RICOH badge at the back is ugly.
Could be far worse, it could have a Canon or Nikon badge on the front.
Justin Francis: Pentax really can't afford to waste resources to come out with such a flawed concept. They really should have canned the Q series and started again.
Please tell me you're not a doctor as you don't know your a___e from your elbow and have clearly never picked up Q to make such a comment.
2PK: ROFLMAO! 3 years ago Sony released the Alpha 850, full frame, 24mp sensor, less than $2000 and barely a word was said apart from a little known Barnaby Britton praising Sony for doing so.
Then Nikon announce the D600 and are heralded as the saviours of the photographic world despite being late to the affordable FF party.
As for the high iso low noise performance there are already cameras out there that cost less and peform as well if not better. So will all the Nikon fanboys put their toys back in the pram and quietly but quickly please leave the buidling, and if the Canon club could just join the tail of the line too please.....
jdh99,I did say as good as or better, the difference between all of them is marginal and in some tests some cameras perform better. The amount of noise in the red channel on the D600 is shocking compared with lots of other cameras.
Ok in an easy to understand graphical format for you;
Sadly Canon don't have anything that comes close below the 5dMk3.
BTW no one said anything about FF in terms of ISO/noise performance.
ROFLMAO! 3 years ago Sony released the Alpha 850, full frame, 24mp sensor, less than $2000 and barely a word was said apart from a little known Barnaby Britton praising Sony for doing so.