jquagga

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/50186255 You'll still have IBIS if you don't turn it off.  The O.I.S. will be off unless you move the lens to a recent PEN/Panny body.

Well, you asked.   I don't like the fixed "sliver" of a screen that dpreview takes up.  I have a 1080p monitor and yet dpreview stays with an antiquated, fixed column in the middle wasting a huge...

No, you should be able to see the prime difference against that just ok zoom. However if you need a 45 and have a 20, then the zoom still wins. That's the trade off. The 20 is currently my favorite...

You're going to get half the folks voting for the 20 and half for the Sigma's.  Which camera and what are you shooting?  Are you doing video or not?   Since you haven't specified I've decided that...

That's ok. Sony waited too long to announce the NEX-3N and I ended up getting the E-PM2 instead. So we traded spots and both manufacturers made out.

I'm very interested in this lens as well.  I asked Sigma USA when they thought it would be available here in the States but unfortunately they had no idea.  By their press release I figured it...

Sure, but I'd like the option to make the sets view my default view when people come to flickr/me or whatnot.  The photostream is too all over the place.   A day later and I think I'm mostly ok...

Having spent a bit of time with my new E-PM2 I agree with just about everything in this review.   The only part that bothers me is that the black kit lens on your red E-PM2 looks about a billion...

At 16 megapixel jpegs, flickr says you only can upload about 100,000 times that amount for free with ads.

With a touch of pinterest / Google+ yes. It also has some nasty bugs at present. I don't care for it.

I think they've botched the marketing here a bit.  $50 a year for hosting a terrabyte of photos isn't bad.  But they've now made it so you're paying $50 to have "ads removed".   It's a 500px knock...

They doubled the price too if I'm reading this correctly.  It's now listed at $49.99 to go ad-free.  I'm thinking Pro users are grandfathered into this but I'm not sure yet.

Yeah, I think if I could get one for $99 I'd jump on that.  My main aversion to it right now is that it has the same reported situation as my APS-C's lens.  Namely it gets soft on the long end.  I...

You are welcome.  It's hard to classify values.  Honestly, your best bet for a value in m43 land is patience.  There are periodical sales events which chop down the prices.  Although those...

This statement is getting a little confusing.  Panasonic nor Olympus put OIS in their wider primes.  So in that case, Olympus bodies have the advantage.  If I'm reading this correctly the question...

You do.  You can also shoot RAW and tinker with things to your heart's content.  Olympus just seems to have a different view of the world with their JPEG processing.  I wouldn't say its more...

That's pretty much the decision.  The GX1 or the Oly's that I believe has a better sensor (I have an Oly now).  The Oly will cost more, but it does have more potential features and if your daughter...

My ORF files from the E-PM2 are the same size as the TIFF's generated by Olympus Viewer.  They're 4:3 to start out with.  The file size is the same size as the sensor specs so, I don't believe...

My 20mm is on a E-PM2 at the moment.  It's a fine camera, but I think an E-PL5 or GX1 would be good options with more hard control points (less menu diving) than this E-PM2.  I'm not disappointed...

I don't know of any camera brand where Adobe automatically picks up the same settings as the in camera processing.  In Lightroom Adobe's processing is so slow you can usually open up a photo the...