magneto shot: seriously 1/2.3 sensor? sure someone brought up pentax Q...but...is that really sellable at all? come on, guys, lets not fool with physics. The days of 1/2.3 sensor compacts being anything serious are gone. even camera phone (808 pureview nokia) have much bigger sensor.
Unfortunately the 1/2.3" are the facto standard among small super-zoom compact cameras, with Fujifilm Finepix 770EXR and some of its predecessors as the only exceptions I know about.This is because it probably is more simply to fit a smaller cmos or ccd to the back of a super-zoom and it also benefits from the bigger crop/multiplier compared to marginally bigger 1/1.7" sensors.
Thinking about the sensor-size and missed raw. I wouldn't say that S100 is the direct competitor for the P300 and now P310. The specs are closer to the Canon Elph 500HS / Ixus 310 http://www.dpreview.com/products/canon/compacts/canon_ixus310hsFor Nikon this remain something of a missed opportunity as them unfortunately aimed too low imo.
50mm on Aps-c equals 75mm. A focal length which I not found much use for when I had the Nikkor AF 50mm 1.8D and used it with the D1H.Wonder if this Pentax 50mm 1.8 might cover a future Pentax with FF. Probably not, so the question is how bad the corner falloff and vignetting is going to be like.
Sean Nelson: I find it frustrating that your reviews of AA-powered cameras never properly explain the battery options:
- Alkalines are for emergency use because they can be bought anywhere and retain their charge for decades. But they drain quickly during actual use in high current devices such as digital cameras and you should never use them as a "normal" choice for your camera.
- Lithium batteries (the non-rechargeable ones) have extremely long shelf life and a very high capacity. My experience is that you can get a couple of thousand shots out of them. They're expensive, but perfect if you're going on a trip where recharging opportunities won't be available.
(continued next post...)
To benefit from Hybrid batteries like Sanyo Eneloop one also needs a good charger which support discharging to keep the Nimhs in good condition over time.
tessl8d: These reviews are just a bit of grease for the corporate wheels. I been looking for a Ricoh GRD4 review and found one yesterday posted by an enthusiast.G great info and amazing samples.Pays to look around. DPR's previews and samples are pretty ordinary.
Since when is the GRD4 relevant here? It is another compact, definitely not a super-zoom. By the way, the GRD4 is very much of a raw only compact. It may have NR off but as many users of Ricoh-compacts know, that is not real NR off.But I agree that Dpreview should spend more time to review the real intersting models instead for this 'me too' super zoom. Especially since the SX240 and SX260 have been around for some time and have very good image quality compared to most of their main competitors.
I fail to see why Dpreview bothered to review this Canon-model when there is an other, more interesting, SX240 or Sx260 with an even longer zoom.
Actually this camera might be good after all. The XP30 which was slammed in the waterproof group-test last year had lower NR than, if not all, so at least most of the competing cameras but the thick protection glass eventually let it down image-quality wise.Some real Full-size sample images from a test with the XP150 indicates that it is a good step in the right direction with a not so thick protection glass this time.http://www.trustedreviews.com/fujifilm-xp150_Digital-Camera_photos_20time in the waterproof group-test which is to be expected at some time during the summer or better, before the summer begin.So I dont think Fujifuilm is gonna finish last another time.If they do, then it would be something of an infamous hat trick because in the first two tests of waterproof compacts, the Fujifilm-compacts have finished last so far. The Pentax WG-2 have turned out to be trash image-quality wise and also three of the new Olympus TG seems to be worse as well.
If Fujifilm announced a waterproof camera with EXR-sensor and a slightly faster zoom. Then we might have something to talk about. Oh, and also drop that useless 9 cm macro.
markcaff: Schaki:... Just Looking at random Photos from these cameras...is not going to work!... It’s to hard to tell? You need to see the same shot... same lighting, iso and all other conditions and then those shots magnified it to see the real differences. Look at the last four images and enlarge.
That's just controlled studio-tests. In real life pictures, landscape, disclosured the the waterpaintings which the Panasonic ZS20 is up to. I had already seen that in the Dpreview samples and here is another which you seem to have missed. http://www.dcresource.com/sites/default/files/galleries/panasonic-lumix-dmc-zs15-photo-gallery/P1010166.Jpg
You are a trollin Panny-fanboy with only two posts so. So, I'll not feed the troll but rather disclosure it ;)
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20 for these which may like to create waterpaintings with a camera. Canon Powershot SX240/260 are marginally better http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/canon/powershot_sx260-review/galleryNikon Coolpix 9300 just about OK. But it is a quite bad copy of the zoom which have been used in the test with full-size sample images which I noticed. Especially the left side of the zoom seems to be very soft. Noticeably in the picture with all the flowers and also some other. http://dpinterface.com/2012/04/23/nikon-coolpix-s9300-photo-gallery/
FFS stop with these stupid "first impressions" and spend that time on the real thing instead - The review! This have become quite irritating.Edit: Initial full size sample images are always to be welcomed but no need to waste time on other things which are expected to be in the final review.
Fine if Fuji manages to fix this irritating issue. Luckily I've not bought an X10, but at least I might try one if this problem ever gets fixed for real within something like 2 or 3 months.But no word at all about some solution for the Sticky aperture issue with the X100? Fujifilm better not leave these which soon are out of warranty for dead whenever they get problem with the aperture. It's is about time to think about their reputation, escpecially now with the X-Pro1 coming, not to lose faith among existing buyers of the X100 and also potential buyers which already know about the problem.
Samuel Dilworth: Nice to see Ricoh continue its fine tradition of releasing meaningful firmware updates long after the review sites have had their say and moved onto the next thing. There's something reassuringly old-fashioned about Ricoh's approach to its customers.
While I agree with your post, I think it should be mentioned that this kind of firmware-support only are available for the GR Digital-series and GXR and the modules which can be connected to it.Just noticed when I checked that functions have been added for the Ricoh G700 and G700SE. http://ricoh.com/r_dc/download/firmware/g700/#02These are aimed at industrial use. I actually bought a G700 for testing-purpose and have used it with the latest firmware for some time and also written a short review of it. http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1013&message=40258631
At least I don't think that there ever were functions added afterwards through a firmware for the GX100, GX200, any of the R-series cameras, PX or the CX superzooms. Though the current functions in some or many of these have been tweaked. I Though with this said. I stand to be corrected if I've missed something regarding this last part.
Yet not even APS-C sensor size...
Yiotis: I'm so scared to challenge this awesome camera with my Nikon D2Hs(4MP)
I'm also in for the 'challenge' with my Nikon D1H with only 2.6mp ;)
P310 - Another wasted compact. Again, Nikon have fumbled it wrong this time too.A serious compact with a fast widest aperture needs something more to get the best out of it. Raw and a 1/1.7" sensor as for the Coolpix P7100. Add that tilt-lcd and it would have been even better/more interesting.Hopefully there is more in camera-parameters to tweak the jpeg-output this time - Something that the P300 also missed. It should also offer the option NR off, especially now without raw.
Kind of late. This camera should have been black in the very first place.
Mark Prince: and... no mention of fixes to the horrible X100 firmware? Disappointing.
Fuji is clearly not in the same league as Ricoh when it comes to refine firmwares. They seem however to be similarly bad to deal with reasonable solutions for design-flaws like ADJ-wheel freezing/hanging with the GRDI and for Fuji sticky X100 apertures. For the later it is not a big problem yet but people will begin get plssed when their X100 are out of warranty and run into that problem then.
Sevventh: Kodak's value is rarely seen by the consumer anymore, they make the sensor for the Leica M9 and have patents which are worth a fortune however.
As unleamy says about the sensor-division is right.It might also already have been doubts about however Leica was about to go with Kodak yet another time for their coming Leica M10 or finally switch to FF ccds from Sony. It is well known that the M9 lagged behind some other pro grade cameras, at the time, with FF from Nikon and Canon.Kodak colours is something nice but won't always outweigh the lack of usable high iso - Something which I think that even Olympus realized when them finally switched from Kodak to Panasonic.Maybe Leica had already made up their decision regarding that for the M10 and even made it clear for Kodak that they had decided to stick to some other manufacturer? Who can say for sure? - We can just speculate about that.
Kodak should have done something cool like Fuji and and produced a camera like the X100, Leica X1, Sigma DP1 etc.They could even have been first to offer a compact with FF ccd an a fixed 28 or 35mm high quality lens. Unfortunately Kodak managed to throw away one of their valuable technologies that might be worth somthing - the sensor-division.Maybe a restructuring of the management could save the company even though I've my doubt that.
Get a weekly update of all that's new in the digital
photography world by subscribing to the Digital Photography Review