schaki

schaki

Lives in Sweden Sweden
Works as a Student
Joined on Nov 18, 2006

Comments

Total: 115, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Fujifilm X100S Review preview (489 comments in total)

Not a word on the conclusion page about the detail-smudging and that have probably been the major complain among the owners of the X100 which bought the X100S as well or looked close at sample images.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 30, 2013 at 17:12 UTC as 92nd comment | 3 replies
On Nokia's 41MP Lumia 1020 looks impressive post (227 comments in total)

Dammit Nokia...
Details gets ruined by bad NR.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 24, 2013 at 18:03 UTC as 39th comment | 9 replies
On Pentax Q7 added to our studio comparison database article (118 comments in total)

The lens is not a very good copy. The left side is sharper than the right, looking at the two chess-lika squares to the left and right side of the top and also the silver-watch in the right lower corner is not very sharp either.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews_data/pentax_q7/boxshot/imgp7101.jpg

Direct link | Posted on Jul 11, 2013 at 12:07 UTC as 33rd comment | 4 replies
On Pentax unveils blue and white K-01 in Japan article (262 comments in total)

Dammit Pentax... GTFO with this joke and that comes from one which like some of the Ricoh compacts though not some of the more questionable products like Pentax Q etc.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 7, 2013 at 11:21 UTC as 26th comment | 1 reply
On Just posted: Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS Review preview (106 comments in total)

The Powershot D20 may have a slow lens but at least preserves fine-details better due to low NR. How hard could it be for Olympus to include NR options or Raw? Guess not so hard..

Direct link | Posted on Jun 29, 2013 at 22:22 UTC as 32nd comment
On Just posted: Our Fujifilm X-M1 hands-on preview article (117 comments in total)

I find it somewhat laughable that Fujifilm have copied the "M" from Leica rangefinders at the same time as using the M for their most simple model which in fact should be for the X-Pro1.
So what is the next joke from Fujifilm? Probably that the jpegs with badly smudged foliage still remain unchanged from previous models in the X-series? At least i might guess so unless they've some other bad card to play on..
I could have considered the X20 if it not had been for that very irritating flaw.
At least they've got the tilt-lcd right with the X-M1. Hope to see options with low NR included as well and I might test one.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 25, 2013 at 11:45 UTC as 25th comment | 8 replies

A review first now - One year late. I've already had a D20 but returned it.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 19, 2013 at 15:52 UTC as 26th comment | 1 reply
On Photoshop CC: Adobe responds to reaction article (1853 comments in total)

Competitors like C1 are about to grow as Adobe feed them like this. The attitude of Adobe might need to grow a pair, away from this recently upcoming childishness not to lose users.

Direct link | Posted on May 9, 2013 at 16:02 UTC as 184th comment

No support for Samsung NX eh?

Direct link | Posted on May 3, 2013 at 18:59 UTC as 9th comment
On Pentax offers K-30 in a variety of colors and finishes article (118 comments in total)

Almost as laughable and pathetic as Leica with all their nonsense white and whatever colours of their M-models.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 3, 2013 at 14:09 UTC as 33rd comment

Still same slow zoom. The Powershot D20 have a similar slow zoom though with better macro and no crazy NR. Time to wake up, Fujifilm, and follow in the footsteps of TG1 and Pentax WG-3 though with way lower NR!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 22, 2013 at 16:54 UTC as 25th comment

Hopefully Canon improved the somewhat slow AF and also kept the Low NR from the SX260.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 21, 2013 at 10:16 UTC as 31st comment

No lenses compatible with Fujifilm X or Samsung NX_mount eh? That's too bad as these two currently leads the pack.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 14, 2013 at 15:44 UTC as 12th comment | 1 reply
On Actual Pixels - the pixel peeping app for iOS post (33 comments in total)

Rather, Actual Nightmare, app, as it reveals just how bad NR in the Iphone 5 is ;)
Iphone 4 and and 4S seem to be better, not to mention the Nokia N8 and PV 808.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 13, 2013 at 16:41 UTC as 16th comment
On Preview:nikon-coolpix-a (442 comments in total)
In reply to:

Richard Murdey: Ricoh GR Digital is worried right about now.

Guess not. Ricoh filed a patent for a new Aps-c 28mm equivalent lens which probably is going to be used in the GRD V. Not same lens as in the GXR A12 28mm.
As usually in the compact camera segment, Ricoh is going to offer superior customizable user interface.

Posted on Mar 5, 2013 at 07:10 UTC
On Olympus USA announces XZ-10 enthusiast compact article (45 comments in total)
In reply to:

AllOtherNamesTaken: 1/2.3" for $400? Pass. Again.

Yes. A similar waste like the Nikon Coolpix P300 and P310 which also had fast lens at the wide end but only 1/2.3" Cmos or Bsi-cmos.
At least the P310 wa a good improvement over the P300 with a new sensor, better jpeg engine and Nr Low as option which the P300 not had. But still, no raw. At least the XZ-10 offer raw.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 19, 2013 at 15:47 UTC
On 41-megapixel Nokia EOS smartphone looking likely post (11 comments in total)
In reply to:

schaki: Sounds great. That we finally get a 'PV 808' with WP8.
I've lost count of how mani times I for myself have cursed the headless decision of Nokia to stick with that old, outdated Symbian OS POS for a model like the 808 which had so held so much potential.

Maybe them should have given such a model decent hardware to run able WP8, then...

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2013 at 20:46 UTC
On 41-megapixel Nokia EOS smartphone looking likely post (11 comments in total)

Sounds great. That we finally get a 'PV 808' with WP8.
I've lost count of how mani times I for myself have cursed the headless decision of Nokia to stick with that old, outdated Symbian OS POS for a model like the 808 which had so held so much potential.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 7, 2013 at 14:18 UTC as 7th comment | 3 replies
On Samsung Galaxy Camera in-depth review post (84 comments in total)

The usual Samsung detail-destruction NR. Hardly a surprise... How long can it possibly take until them learn from that mistake.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 7, 2013 at 12:12 UTC as 33rd comment | 2 replies
On CP+ 2013: Interview with Olympus' Toshi Terada article (242 comments in total)

Problem is that there is probably not many users left which still actively uses their E-4x0, 5x0. May be different for 600-users and diehard E-1, E-3 and E-5 users.
Many have may have made the switch to other dslrs which offered better high iso and Dr and maybe even switched to Olympus m4/3 or some other mirrorless system. The future in general for Dslrs aint looking very bright with the mirrorless system beginning to catch up in AF-speed which many of them still lagged behind.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 2, 2013 at 13:12 UTC as 44th comment | 4 replies
Total: 115, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »