ljmac: This suffers from the usual Sony problem: nice camera, shame about the bulky, narrow range of lenses. I find it frustrating that interchangeable lens cameras are reviewed as if they are products in isolation, while they are only half of the equation in reality, and that other half should be given more weight in reviews.
And what's with the headline?
Agreed, large lenses on small bodies don't cut it.Sony is acting like you will want them just because they are so cool. But when you take them home you realize that something is wrong (in the lenses). Not really feeling the love here from Sony until they get serious about affordable and smaller glass. Grand opportunity for Sigma here. I'd love the Sigma contemporary art 17-70 in e-mount.
marike6: Oh wow, another Sony NEX E-mount body for almost double the price of the A6000, the same atrociously bad kit lens and perhaps the least inspiring lens lineup ever produced.
@JacobC, what brand/body did you goto?
caravan: Sony a6300,best compact camera of 2016.Thanks Sony for a great product at an affordable price.
Product great, looks that way. Affordable price? Not for most folks. Sony is retreating up$tream.
I have a G5, my first M/43. I am impressed and it's the first camera since way back when I got started (30 years ago) that I really ENJOY using.
It's really strange that dpreview will be among the last, if ever, to review this camera. I used to look to dpreview as my major camera review source. No more. They need to get on the ball in general and to have a video review presence like cameralabs.com.