Levan

Levan

Joined on Mar 15, 2011

Levan's recent activity

  • Obviously you never used Olympus HG and SHG lenses you mentioned. If you ever will, you'll think twice before comparing them with Canon crapy kit lens. Your conversion of f stops is pointless ...
  • In terms of c-af I have to agree, bit there are other aspects also. Anyway, sorry for misunderstanding.
  • These are not entry level milc's. They perform much better than any entry level canon, which are crap, especialy with those kit lenses. According to your post you never tried these mirorless ...
  • Nikon and canon refuse to seriously go to mirorless due to several reasons, first being, that they do not want to admit that this is the serious segment. There are a lot of buyers for whom canikon ...
  • Nikon and canon refuse to seriously go to mirorless due to several reasons, first being, that they do not want  to admit that this is the serious segment. There are a lot of buyers for whom ...
  • The article does not mention anything about MILS outselling DSLR. it was about the growth of mirrorless market (loosing less money if you wish). By the way, there is a big world outside Americas, ...
  • Replied in EM1 PDAF
    E-m1 is no match to D800 in this regard. However, it's much better than you achieved. if you want it to be as good as d800, don't waste time. If you're ready for some compromises, you should try to ...
  • Great post.
  • Well, I overrated your ability to read between the lines, while suggesting, that I was arguing with mature person. AND THERE I REALLY FAILED. You're so childish. Grow up already. OK, your toy is ...
  • I should say I enjoyd your bla bla bla, but I did not:) even if E-M1 was squashed, not by any camera, but your ignorance. happy shooting with your latest and greatest:)
  • Thanks for the link. You're position is very mature and balanced, but again, gearheads don't care.do you pay attention toth e similarities between this forum and cellphone forums? They are exactly ...
  • Of course, I do know that. I shoot products also. Sometimes e-m1 is more than enough, sometimes I use FF. Depending on what is the final "Destination" of the photo (big/small poster, flyer etc). I ...
  • I really can not comment on this. E-m1, of course delivers better IQ from technical point of view, but how much better, i can not recall (as you said, 9 years have passed). But i own d800 and i ...
  • there was really nothing to say:) see below. did you read what i wrote in previous post? You're saying the same thing but with confidence, like you discovered America. again, read my post above, ...
  • But Quality of the Image is IQ (image quality). It became a technical term, when techno geeks decided to do so. And, it's a shame this forum is overcrowded with technical geeks, rather with photo ...
  • let me simplify it for you. While looking at the image, if technical perfection is the first thing on your mind, than there is something very wrong with the picture or with the viewer. e-m1 IQ can ...
  • I never said that. You must be mistaken. It was someone else. 100 % correct, but in great image (as history shows us) 90% goes to the artistic side and only 10% to the pure technical quality. right ...
  • No, it does not. Total light gathering - yes, but apperture is 2.8. Check the formula for apperture before you proceed.
  • I don't need arguments, cause I'm not as precisely critical as you are. I'm not trying to proove something. I'm just saying, that your arguments, which involves only technical data, is not enough ...
  • Here is the problem of techno geeks like you. I can not be wrong, cause i don't claim anything. Your truth, on the other hand, is temporary and subjective. my truth is universal. My  suggestions ...
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
Levan has not added any gear yet.
Total messages 253
Threads started 7
Last post 3 weeks ago
Total comments 0
Total likes 0
Total reviews 0
Entries 0
Votes cast 0
Photos uploaded 0