argyrotype: If I'd taken this pic, the next step would be the "DELETE" button. a 2 on the 10 scale....
Turbguy1: Film just died....
Film died years ago
Biowizard: Can ANYONE explain, why is the FX format 35.9 x 24 mm, rather than 36 x 24 mm? For the sake of 0.1mm, Nikon produces high-res images that a very NEARLY but NOT QUITE in 2:3 aspect ratio? Not that it will stop the world, but it's just a bit of a puzzle!
For years Nikon insisted that they wouldn't bring out a FF camera. When they realised that they had no other choice, they bought out their own format called FX that's almost, but not exactly, the same as FF. So no-one could say that they mis-informed their customers.
lester11: That 'full disclosure' needed to come at the start of the article, not the end.
Agreed - if an article is going to be heavily biased (almost an advert, really) then the reader should be informed up front
Get a weekly update of all that's new in the digital
photography world by subscribing to the Digital Photography Review