keeponkeepingon

Lives in United States United States
Joined on May 28, 2005

Comments

Total: 395, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »

I'm really interested in how this compares to casio 1000fps modes that have been around (and refined) for 7 years.

Unfortunately Casio can't be bothered with the US and European market these days. A pitty as they've produced some really cool kit in the past.

Link | Posted on Aug 12, 2015 at 11:18 UTC as 5th comment | 4 replies
On article Capture One Pro 8 software review (317 comments in total)

"A notable absence from the compatibility list is Hasselblad – perhaps too much of an arch rival in the medium format world."

You fail to mention Capture One blocking Pentax 647Z comparability. The software is compatible (you can change the EXIF camera model data to IQ250 and it will work with 647Z files) but they pulled support to undermine their competition in the hardware arena.

Or is this no longer an issue?

Thanks!

Link | Posted on Aug 11, 2015 at 20:41 UTC as 6th comment
On article Quick Review: PhotoKeeper (103 comments in total)

Why the focus on free services and no mention of zenfolio?

Zenfolio is the number one hit on DDG and number two on google for the search "photographer portfolio hosting web site"

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=photographer+portfolio+hosting+web+site

Plus Zen has RAW storage available for every account level:

http://www.zenfolio.com/z/product/features/compare

Link | Posted on Aug 1, 2015 at 06:11 UTC as 18th comment
On article Quick Review: PhotoKeeper (103 comments in total)
In reply to:

Snikt228: There are truly a crazy number of photo sites out there now, you have to wonder how many will have disappeared without a trace even in 5 years

exactly. I remember a couple of years ago the verge did a roundup and picked a brand new service based on social integration or something. Two years later the service went under.

The one I worry about the most is smugmug. I've been a member off and on for years. It's a mom and pop company run by folks that seem decent and in some ways head and shoulders above the free stuff. However if you listen to interviews with the guy who runs it, it's horrifying to hear about the legal shenanigans they have to go through fighting the patent trolls just to exist.

Link | Posted on Jul 31, 2015 at 15:34 UTC
On article Quick Review: PhotoKeeper (103 comments in total)

Is there a LightRoom plugin/Publishing service? Because after using smugmug/zen/flickr with a publishing service it's hard to imagine using anything without that feature.

It would take a lot to get me back on the old export upload repeat everythime you make a change treadmill.

Link | Posted on Jul 31, 2015 at 15:13 UTC as 36th comment | 1 reply
On Connect post Google to phase out Google+ Photos (36 comments in total)
In reply to:

keeponkeepingon: I"m curious why this is under connect?

Sure there are apps for it but this is just a shift of googles web accessible photo service away from "plus".

I think it's a "good thing", they are treating photos as a tier one product similar to gmail.

Sure it's photo news, but mobile news? It'd be like if you started reporting anything flickr related under connect just because "there's an app for that".

Well yeah, I rarely read "connect" news, as I could care less about phone stuff and I hate the blinding white background.

But it's just bizzare. Google has a zillion dollar investment in photo storage accessible from any device or computer and you put any news on the whole system here in your mobile news because "there's an app for that".

The first article on this was so mobile centric I did not realize google photos applied to my computer/web accessible online photos until I read about it on a competitors web site.

Just look at your title of the first roll out of photos and tell me what sort of grade you'd get in journalism school for capturing the news in one sentence:

"Google rolls out standalone Photos app with unlimited free storage"

Link | Posted on Jul 24, 2015 at 12:34 UTC
On Connect post Google to phase out Google+ Photos (36 comments in total)

I"m curious why this is under connect?

Sure there are apps for it but this is just a shift of googles web accessible photo service away from "plus".

I think it's a "good thing", they are treating photos as a tier one product similar to gmail.

Sure it's photo news, but mobile news? It'd be like if you started reporting anything flickr related under connect just because "there's an app for that".

Link | Posted on Jul 22, 2015 at 12:33 UTC as 16th comment | 2 replies
On article Sony adds XAVC S and high bitrate video to a6000 (186 comments in total)
In reply to:

keeponkeepingon: Sony's firmware update process is abysmal. On canon I just transfer a file to my SD card and tell the camera to update the firmware. With sony I need to install software which is at times incompatible with the latest version of OSX then run a program that may or may not brick my camera. As a canon/sony owner the whole process makes me go WTF sony?

I'm mostly happy with my A6000 but where it stumbles it falls flat on it's face. The simple process of zooming in on a image when viewing it after taking the shot takes seconds then it's zap a max in preview that either needs to be panned or zoomed out. This makes chimping in the field a real hassle.

Question: I'm still on firmware 1.0, will the latest firmware fix the delay in zooming in on image playback issue? Thanks!

I updated the firmware and it was huge PITA compared to my canon firmware updates (xfer new firmware to an SD card, select update firmware from the cameras menue, done).

And..... it was a waste of time. Zooming in is still just as slow and I don't even notice the faster startup time. Oh well at least now I can complain that "even with the latest firmware".....

"The zoom-in is quite well designed. "
It's slow as heck compared to every other camera I own.

"The only downside is that it does not zoom on to your focus point"

Exactly so it zooms 100% to the wrong point then you need to pan over to what you are interested in, further slowing down the process.

Link | Posted on Jul 22, 2015 at 11:08 UTC

Wow.

Bravo for lensrental not only to go through all this work but then to give it away for free.

One standout to me was that the new Canon 50mm F1.8 STM achieves a consitency score of 9.3 the second highest score in the table and right up there with Zeiss. Not bad for a $150 lens.....

You could argue that the 50mm is the easiest of the bunch to make, but the equivalent Nikon only achieved a consistency of 6.3 so bravo Canon

Link | Posted on Jul 22, 2015 at 10:42 UTC as 34th comment | 5 replies
On article Canon EOS 5DS real-world sample gallery (217 comments in total)
In reply to:

Photoman: Wait till the A7RII is reviewed and watch the second hand market get flooded with Canon 5DS cameras...

"Those people mostly buy Canon lenses."

Isn't one of the selling points of the A7RII fast AF with canon lenses? Could have swore I saw that somewhere but maybe I'm wrong?

Link | Posted on Jul 21, 2015 at 05:39 UTC
On Connect post Microsoft retires Photosynth apps (13 comments in total)
In reply to:

LSE: the web is the future. cross platform. always up to date. and cloud computing backed.

" cross platform. always up to date. and cloud computing backed"

You just described email which is the way I share photosynth images with the current app. If I need to use a third party web page to show folks a picture I'll drop photosynth and find another app.

Link | Posted on Jul 14, 2015 at 21:39 UTC
In reply to:

DotCom Editor: Will it mate with an iPhone that's in a case?

That's a great question! I forgo a lot of neat accessories because they will not work with my otter box. They should partner with otterbox and make a rugged version....

Link | Posted on Jun 18, 2015 at 13:48 UTC

3 front page features on this copy of a sony innovation? Three. It's almost like dpreview has some sort of formal relationship with DXO. Oh wait they do.....

Link | Posted on Jun 18, 2015 at 13:47 UTC as 136th comment | 7 replies
On article Sony adds XAVC S and high bitrate video to a6000 (186 comments in total)

So this is a higher bitrate 1080p not 4k/UHD?

As a dad taking happy snaps on holiday or movies of my kids, what's this get me other than huge files that are even harder to process and share? ELI5 if possible as my coffee is still brewing.

THanks!!

Link | Posted on Jun 18, 2015 at 07:24 UTC as 11th comment | 1 reply
On article Sony adds XAVC S and high bitrate video to a6000 (186 comments in total)

Sony's firmware update process is abysmal. On canon I just transfer a file to my SD card and tell the camera to update the firmware. With sony I need to install software which is at times incompatible with the latest version of OSX then run a program that may or may not brick my camera. As a canon/sony owner the whole process makes me go WTF sony?

I'm mostly happy with my A6000 but where it stumbles it falls flat on it's face. The simple process of zooming in on a image when viewing it after taking the shot takes seconds then it's zap a max in preview that either needs to be panned or zoomed out. This makes chimping in the field a real hassle.

Question: I'm still on firmware 1.0, will the latest firmware fix the delay in zooming in on image playback issue? Thanks!

Link | Posted on Jun 18, 2015 at 07:18 UTC as 12th comment | 6 replies
On article Field Test: Sigma 19mm, 30mm and 60mm F2.8 DN lenses (167 comments in total)
In reply to:

keeponkeepingon: I got the 19mm for my A6000 and it's totally meh. After using it as a walkaround lens for a week it now mostly collects dust on my lens shelf.

1. It's not much faster than the kit lens at 19mm
2. The IQ of the kit lens improves quite a bit once you leave the extreme wide end so your not getting tons more resolution if any.
3. AF is only on the center. I thought this wouldn't be an issue as on my canons I use center point AF but once you get used to the A6000's wonderful tracking AF a lens without it feels really lacking.

The reviewer is gaga about the cost but is it really that great? Canon has the terrific 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F2.8 for $150, both fully functional with canon's AF and with wonderful IQ and if you are saying "but but mirrorless" there's the EF-M 22mm/F2 that outperforms the sigma 19mm in every way imagineable and sells for $100ish.

Jun2 I think you misunderstood. I'm not talking about "other bargains" as I don't think the 19mm is a bargain at all, it's overpriced for so so not great IQ and very little to distinguish it from the kit lens. photozone gives it 2 out of 5 stars for optical quality and the gimped AF really sets it apart as not-a-bargain. The canon examples were not "other bargains" they are examples of some real bargains. Great IQ for very little $$. The 24mm F2.8 gets 4 out of 5 stars for optical quaility from photozone.de, lists for 25% less than the sigma and has fully functional AF with canon DSLR and mirrorless cameras.

Link | Posted on May 10, 2015 at 21:59 UTC
On article Field Test: Sigma 19mm, 30mm and 60mm F2.8 DN lenses (167 comments in total)

I got the 19mm for my A6000 and it's totally meh. After using it as a walkaround lens for a week it now mostly collects dust on my lens shelf.

1. It's not much faster than the kit lens at 19mm
2. The IQ of the kit lens improves quite a bit once you leave the extreme wide end so your not getting tons more resolution if any.
3. AF is only on the center. I thought this wouldn't be an issue as on my canons I use center point AF but once you get used to the A6000's wonderful tracking AF a lens without it feels really lacking.

The reviewer is gaga about the cost but is it really that great? Canon has the terrific 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F2.8 for $150, both fully functional with canon's AF and with wonderful IQ and if you are saying "but but mirrorless" there's the EF-M 22mm/F2 that outperforms the sigma 19mm in every way imagineable and sells for $100ish.

Link | Posted on May 9, 2015 at 19:45 UTC as 32nd comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

Dheorl: If only they added in a decent healing brush, then I'd have no reason at all for photoshop.

piratejabez like you can add/remove with the adjustment brush?

Link | Posted on Apr 23, 2015 at 11:30 UTC
In reply to:

Dheorl: If only they added in a decent healing brush, then I'd have no reason at all for photoshop.

Have you tried 5's? The spot removal tool is now a brush. It's OK and hopefully 6 is even better.

Link | Posted on Apr 22, 2015 at 13:05 UTC
In reply to:

dtphoto: If no folders are permitted, does that mean I'm limited to 9,999 images...until my camera's counter rolls over?

Azimuth46

Could you explain this in a bit more detail? I'm not sure I get what you are getting at. I thought DNGs were often smaller than the proprietary raw file (due to compression) and the addition of metadata should only add KB not MB. Thanks!

Link | Posted on Apr 12, 2015 at 16:35 UTC
Total: 395, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »