ManuelVilardeMacedo: They both lack sharpness. I'm sorry for the people who think they'll make great shots with these expensive gadgets, but both of them are short on image quality. Yes, the 808 is better - at least if you can take your mind off the considerable levels of chromatic aberration -, but what's the point? For the price you'll be better off with an enthusiast compact camera like the Sony RX100.
Yeah no one can make a great shot with these expensive gadgets. Just look at all these terrible pictures:
Unlocked 808 $390
RX100 $595 plus then I need a smart phone, so another ... $390ish for an unlocked phone. Twice the price and juggling two devices, go for it.....
Digital Suicide: 808 and 1020 are meant to shoot in 5MP, not at ridiculous 38MP. What's the point comparing them at this resolution?
The second favorite after full res for most 808 shooters is the 8mp mode. Would love to see a comparison at that resolution.
I can't believe you are still continuing to call the RX10 a super zoom.
8X does not a super zoom make.
It looks like a interesting camera but mislabeling is not doing a service to anyone.
I just love that sony is coming out with products such as the RX10, RX100 etc.
However, you really need to change the title of this review; the "Super Zoom" moniker is misleading and just plain wrong.
Doing the math, it's an 8x zom.
In this day and age 8X zoom does not (by a longshot) qualify as a "super zoom".
Even sony calls it a "high zoom" camera.
Maybe "ultimate bridge camera" would be more appropriate?
I find it frustating that you downgrade every picure to an iPhone's resolution before evaluation.
Who the heck wants a "level playing field"??? I really wish you would compare apples and apples and we could see the 41mp pureview sensors duke it out with this 20mp sensor at full resolution.
I barely pay attention to your dxomark phone data, with the exception that I point out this atrocity on every review I care to look at.
"For all DxOMark Mobile data presented on connect.dpreview.com we're showing only the 8MP equivalent values, which gives us a level playing field for comparison between phone cameras with different megapixel values by normalizing all to 8MP"
Griffo 155: Frankly I'm disappointed. No D400 coming soon then?I know the D610 is an upgrade but Nikon could of added a little more...Wifi maybe?I keep saying this Nikon are losing the plot.
Don't go the Blackberry way Nikon!
Pentax Ricoh announced the D300 replacement earlier this week.
Given that the "big" upgrade is the F1.8 versus F2.0 it would be nice to see more lowlight shots.
For most of your examples, an iphone would have been fine....
Also on my review wishlist: since canon is making some fairly dramatic claims on speed and responsiveness improvements over the S110 it would be nice if you had some sort of timing comparison between the new and old model to help us determine if an upgrade is worthwhile.
I've got an 808, arguably the best camera with the biggest sensor in a phone in existence.
While I often love the ouput of the camera on the 808 it can be frustratingly slow to use that camera.
Unfortunately the modern dpreview reviews do little to inform me as to how the speed of the camera/app in my phone (or any other phone) objectively compares to other phones.
I really miss phill's old timing section in his reviews. While he did not do much of a comparison he provided the data to let me compare amongst the various phones of the era :
It would be great if you had something similar for connect phone reviews but perhaps updated for smart phones. (maybe add time to email to time to first shot or something?).
Plastek: Good test. Guys at LensTip.com made similar tests (only never published the results) and came to a similar conclusions - adapters are completely random and getting an acceptable one - perfectly centred with accurate flange distance - is impossible. That's why they test lenses on native bodies instead of comparing all of them in a single body and single sensor (what would allow cross-system comparisons).
So much for all these people thinking that shooting mirrorless with adapters is a valid way for photography.
"That's different. TCs benefit you by providing longer focal length without a need of taking a second lens into your backpack. That's a huge weight-saver for the price of IQ. Completely different situation."
How's that different? Your OK with loosing IQ to save weight/get more zoom, while other folks may be OK with a (slight) IQ loss to use a legacy lens.
It's the same thing. Trading IQ for to do something you normally could not do with your camera. Just because you value zoom and don't value using legacy lenses does not make it totally different.
One nice thing about pentax is there are some great legacy lenses and you don't need an adapter as the current bodies work with lenses made eons ago.
I was disappointed that my fourth generation ipad did not get the panorama feature.
Any idea why? It's has to have the horse power, there are like 20 apps that seem to manage.
An article stating 8mp is good enough right after the new iphone is released with an 8mp sensor?
please add the 808 to the test scenes.
Why add a nitch phone?
The 808 has the largest sensor in a phone; arguably the best cell phone camera to-date.
If I still lived in seattle I'd loan you mine for a day or five but someone has to have one laying around?
Gosh their testing methodology for the video AF is absolutely horrible.
I'm talking about the test where someone holds a memo and walks away from the camera. The guy is moving back and forth so often the camera has no text to focus on.
I'm not sure how they can draw any conclusion from that sort of test.
keeponkeepingon: I'v seen at least one review (digital rev?) trashing the ergonomic of the X-M1
issues included how you have to reach over a control wheel to get to the shutter button and a touch thumb dial on the back that was too easy to easy to hit accidently.
Could any users of the X-M1 comment on how good/bad it is to handle?
" the awesome build quality only found on high end cameras since it has a magnesium alloy body."
Fakuryu Are you sure you used an X-M1? It has a plastic, not magnesium allow body. There's like a metal part on top but most of the body is plastic.
I've never touched it but just looking at it, it looks very cramped for folks with bigger hands.
Just look at it, the way the shutter finger is completely covering the main control dial. Do you turn that dial with the shutter finger or do you slide your thumb over the thumb control dial to get to it?
Regadless of the opinion of Kai just looking at the camera he has some valid points. You do need to reach over the control dial to get to the shutter button, an arangement I've never liked, and there is a thumb button situated right where you may want to place your thumb to hold the camera.
I'm interested in opinons of folks who have handled an X-M1. Your love of Kai is somewhat irrelvant..
I'v seen at least one review (digital rev?) trashing the ergonomic of the X-M1
So slightly upgraded everything, on-sensor phase detect but otherwise a similar sensor/IQ? Sounds like the Canon 70D approch, maybe Canon is on to something....
Did Olympus do anything to improve the menu system?
DELETED88781: Small sensor is not good regardless of any feature.Entry level FF DSLR has 4 times bigger sensor and only 200g more weight. Cost? Almost the same.
"What happens to the "small SLR" when you put a 24-70mm f/2.8 on it?"
What happens to the olympus when you put a F2.8 equivalent zoom on it???
Regarding the tryx:
You need to change your ending from "maybe it was a bit too radical" to:
The tryx is so popular that they are selling for $1000 new and even amazon will pay you $425 for a used one.
Casio recently released a new, upgrade of tryx, the TR15: