keeponkeepingon

keeponkeepingon

Lives in United States United States
Joined on May 28, 2005

Comments

Total: 311, showing: 221 – 240
« First‹ Previous1011121314Next ›Last »
On Canon issues product advisory for PowerShot S100 article (50 comments in total)

So all of the cameras in the published serial number range have this defect, but canon won't do anything until the camera actually fails?

Shame on you canon. Do the right thing and fix cameras with the problem.

I paid top dollar for the best of the best, not something more likely to fail in certain environmental conditions.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 2, 2012 at 22:04 UTC as 28th comment
On Just Posted: Sony DSC-RX100 preview with sample images article (645 comments in total)

Bravo sony!

An S95 with a larger sensor and faster AF? What's not to like?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 6, 2012 at 13:31 UTC as 111th comment | 6 replies
On Just Posted: Canon PowerShot SX260 HS Review article (99 comments in total)
In reply to:

CameraLabTester: There is just so much limited QUALITY that one can cram into a typical
1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) SENSOR that camera companies use (Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus, Panasonic, Samsung, etc)

The selling points are then waged on features, menus, bells and woots.

For a sensor size of 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm), the best balance is just 5 to 7 Mp!

But because camera companies have zombied buyers into thinking more Mps is more good, they don't DARE do a 5 or 7 Mp modern camera.

A 5 Mp or 7 Mp P&S with a 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor can set outstanding standards, but they won't do this... (maybe Leica, because they think OUTSIDE the mirror box...)

.

By CameraLabTester (3 hours ago)
http://petavoxel.wordpress.com/2010/01/19/mp-swindle-example/

Thanks for giving me a good laugh. The guy is using a budget Olympus, notorious for their bad IQ, to prove his point that MP are bad. All he's proving is that budget Olympus P&S cameras are bad.... we all already know that.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 5, 2012 at 13:47 UTC
On Just Posted: Canon PowerShot SX260 HS Review article (99 comments in total)
In reply to:

cheenachatze: According to the Canon specs, shots taken at Fine quality are about 3MB in size, and shots taken at Superfine quality are about 5MB in size. Were the studio shots taken at Fine quality or Superfine quality?

Wow! The return of superfine? I thought canon dropped superfine to help diferentiate mainstream cameras from raw capable cameras a couple of years ago? I don't think my 2011 S100 or SX40 have superfine so it's sort of notable that the SX260 does.

Regarding shooting in fine versus superfine: "fine" is the default setting and Superfine is not offered in all modes. Superfine is only available in Program, Shutter, Aperture, and Manual. If the tests use another mode such as AUTO superfine is not available.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 5, 2012 at 06:15 UTC
On Just Posted: Pentax K-30 video preview article (37 comments in total)
In reply to:

Peiasdf: Just checked out Pentax's lens line up and I cannot find a single fast normal prime. The cheapest "50mm" is 35mm f/2.4 at $180 while the fastest is 31mm f/1.8 at $1,000. Where is the cheap f/1.4~f/1.8?

Good cameras, weird ass lens line up.

"The cheapest "50mm" is 35mm f/2.4 at $180 while the fastest is 31mm f/1.8 at $1,000. Where is the cheap f/1.4~f/1.8?

Good cameras, weird ass lens line up."

How is this weird? Canon seems to do fine without a modern affordable "normal" FOV prime for their APS-C cameras?

Direct link | Posted on May 29, 2012 at 06:46 UTC

It's disappoining that casio has given up on the high end american market. Once they had class leading cameras such as the EX-Z750/850, FH100, FX1. Today they flood the U.S. market with "me too" point and shoots and fashion accessories such as the tryx.

The ZR100 was pretty bad, but we never got try out the ZR200 and I doubt we will ever see the ZR300.

I've given up on casio (ZR750/850, P505, Z80, ZR100 owner) but I really wish someone would copy some of their features.

I love the past movie mode, also called prerecorded video, and have yet to find anything to replace it. Smugmug's camera app has tried to copy it, but I wish other vendors would too. It's the only reason I've purchased my last two casio's and put up with their shortcomings.

Direct link | Posted on May 29, 2012 at 06:23 UTC as 6th comment
On Just Posted: Sony NEX-F3 hands-on preview article (67 comments in total)

Wow!

Love the flip up screen. Perfect for self portrait with the kids.

Direct link | Posted on May 17, 2012 at 04:36 UTC as 20th comment
On Just Posted: Canon PowerShot SX150 IS review article (86 comments in total)

Did anyone actually want this review over a SX40?

Given the SX40 has dipped as low as $250 it's hard to see the point of reviewing (or buying) this camera.....

Direct link | Posted on May 15, 2012 at 10:47 UTC as 30th comment
In reply to:

Otaraka: Im not convinced RAW is a must have for white balance any more, you can adjust JPG's in PS, Lightroom, or even Picasa.

Its really intended as a snorkelling camera and casual use with that depth rating and auto settings. Pity, the fisheye in particular sounded interesting.

Edit: The S90. S95, S100 series canon cameras have 2.0 lenses. Most people would probably prefer those with an underwater housing to whats on offer for more serious underwater photography.

40 ft is great, most of these cameras (Canon D20 etc) are only good down to 33feet. I'm not sure anyone snorkels to 40 feet deep, and if you dive you can get a housing to take you down to 140 feet.

It's really cool it appears to have a pressure meter and warns when you are getting too deep.

I have the Canon S100. An OK camera for the price (I payed like $300 for mine new). At $299 MSRP ($219 amazon) the housing is a tough sell for the beach/pool/snorkling. I'd much rather put that into a tough camera I can throw around and not worry about and save the S100 for land.

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2012 at 07:48 UTC

"Another forget it camera"?

What other (affordable) UW camera has F2.0?

Look at the brand new Canon D20 and Nikon's AW100. They all start at a glacially slow ... F3.9????

Even the top of the heap, the numero uno Panasonic starts at F2.7

And adapters for a point and shoot? An actual fish eye to take pictures of fish?

IF (and it is a big IF given the past record) Olympus has decent IQ this will class leading UW camera and something to remember until the next one comes around....

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2012 at 07:26 UTC as 67th comment

OK who got my DCResource in my DPreview?

What's going on guys? Why is Jeff writing for dpreview when he has his own great site?

Direct link | Posted on May 1, 2012 at 07:09 UTC as 12th comment
On Wi-Fi and Samsung's 'Smart Camera Ecosystem' article (44 comments in total)

actually nikon had wifi like 5 years ago in point and shoots. I'm not sure why it has not caught on. Perhaps it's in the implementation.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 19, 2012 at 08:05 UTC as 21st comment
On Just Posted: Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150 Review article (73 comments in total)
In reply to:

IcyVeins: DPR Please stop reviewing 8-month old cameras, especially compacts, when there are newer cameras that need to be reviewed, if it's not an important enough camera to review when you first get it then just move onto the newer ones and skip it. This camera is probably going to be obsoleted by a newer version in the summer anyways.

I think it's timely enough, but it's confusing why you picked this "also ran" not so super zoom with all of the other options on the market.

I know "you can't please everyone" but the last Canon Superzoom you reviewed was the SX1 and you've never reviewed a nikon superzoom.

With the much more affordable SX40 ($250 for my new one), the much more zoomy P510 and HX200 all out and generating a lot of buzz why this panasonic? What sets it apart and makes it dpreview worthy?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 13, 2012 at 06:35 UTC
On Just Posted: Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150 Review article (73 comments in total)
In reply to:

keeponkeepingon: I may have missed it but I was very surprised you wrote this article ignoring the cheaper Canon SX40

Also you say it compares well with the Sony/Nikon competition but neglect to mention the severe lack of zoom compared to the rest of the field (600 versus 800mm+ equivalent).

You may think it does not matter but ask a birder which camera they rather have......

It would not be a big deal if the difference was not so huge but to say "compares well" and not mention how poorly Panasonic compares in actual zooming is negligent:

Zooms on leading compact telephoto cameras:

FZ150: 23X
Sony HX200v: 30X
Nikon P510: 42X
Canon SX40: 35X

"the combination of lens quality/sensor/focus at the extreme end resolved just as much detail, in direct comparisons available on the internet."

Source?????

You are claiming that at 23x the 6 megapixels from the FZ150 sensor are equivalent to 12 megapixels from the SX40 sensor at 35X?

I can't find any source that claims the canon is that bad, to the contrary the sensor in the SX40 is normally ranked above the FZ150, especially at high ISOs.

Regarding "unsable zooms" most SX40 owners in the canon forum would argue that the 35X is very useable. There are some fairly stunning pictures on the forum at full zoom that I don't thiink could be captured with the FZ150.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 12, 2012 at 14:28 UTC
On Just Posted: Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150 Review article (73 comments in total)

I may have missed it but I was very surprised you wrote this article ignoring the cheaper Canon SX40

Also you say it compares well with the Sony/Nikon competition but neglect to mention the severe lack of zoom compared to the rest of the field (600 versus 800mm+ equivalent).

You may think it does not matter but ask a birder which camera they rather have......

It would not be a big deal if the difference was not so huge but to say "compares well" and not mention how poorly Panasonic compares in actual zooming is negligent:

Zooms on leading compact telephoto cameras:

FZ150: 23X
Sony HX200v: 30X
Nikon P510: 42X
Canon SX40: 35X

Direct link | Posted on Apr 12, 2012 at 09:24 UTC as 16th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

Ross Murphy: you can find good ones for free at Adobe and around the web or make your own for free

which ones are the good ones though? There is so much garbage ou t there it would almost be worth spending $16 on something decent.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 17, 2012 at 13:13 UTC

ARGGGGGGGGGGG

I just tried to download iPhoto for my 3GS and I got the error:

"This app is incompatible with this iPHone

This app requires a front facing camera"

What the heck apple?????????

It's like Light Room saying it won't install because I don't have a webcam?????

Direct link | Posted on Mar 8, 2012 at 19:35 UTC as 30th comment | 2 replies

Has academic pricing been released yet?

$59 for LR3, $50 for Photoshop CS5.5

With the declining prices can we assume $30 for LR4 student and teacher?

Ah I just googled and it's $79 for the student eddition.

I think it used to list at $99.

Odd that the Retail version gets a 50% price cut and the student version gets a 20% price cut.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 6, 2012 at 12:59 UTC as 22nd comment
In reply to:

evogt500: The IXUS 500 (10.1 MP) actually used a 1/2.3" 16MP sensor but cropped. effectively making it a 1/3" sensor ( the area which actually recieves light). Is it the same with the camera?

I was confused but then realized you are using the uk/europe model numbers.

Tranlating to english IXUS 500 HS= the new Elph 520 HS.

Gosh canon needs to hire a new Chief Naming Officer....

I

Direct link | Posted on Mar 2, 2012 at 15:45 UTC

Thanks for the review!

Question: Does the wrist strap have a stylus thingy and was using the touchscreen better with the stylus? Older models included a little nub on the wrist strap restriction thingy, does this model have it and if so did it help cure your touch screen woes????
Suggestion: Canon's model numbers are somewhat confusing. It would be nice to have some help figuring out where this fits in the Canon Constelation as often both the old and new version are available at retail.

You would think the 510 HS would be the upgrade to the 500 HS but from the specs, it looks more like an upgrade to the SD4500? Right now the SD4500 is selling out at $159 while the 510 HS selling for a hefty $279.

For those shopping now, other than the extra 2X zoom are there enough improvements to justify the extra expense? A few lines comparing this model to it's predecessor would be a big help making that decisions...

Direct link | Posted on Mar 2, 2012 at 02:41 UTC as 4th comment | 1 reply
Total: 311, showing: 221 – 240
« First‹ Previous1011121314Next ›Last »