no viewfinder no deaL, PERIOD!
Haim Hadar: The Sony-RX100 mk III should have really been here.
It's not a new camera.
CMurdock: The Sigma Merrill cameras have the best image quality of any pocketable camera, but DPR won't review them. I wouldn't dream of buying a camera (like this one) that has aggressive sharpening of JPGs that can't be turned off.
Right, but the camera is not useable, if you know what I mean.
The testphoto's show that the Panny GM1 shows just a little more detail. Agressive noisereduction in the E-M10?
eddie_cam: Wanna compare the size visually? Be my guest ...:
Nice, but what is your point?
eivissa1: I am sure that the expected Panasonic LX8 or 9 will be far better!
You could be right about that.
I am sure that the expected Panasonic LX8 or 9 will be far better!
pacnwhobbyist: I was hoping that they would release an LX7 update..maybe that's forthcoming?
LX updates are mostly half the year.
dialstatic: Vrolijk kerstfeest en een gelukkig 2014!
Ik sluit mij daarbij aan.
bloodycape: This camera is really tempting, but my only concern is maximum shutter speed of 1/50 when using the flash(would have like at least 1/240, but even 1/100 could have possibly worked. Maybe the GM2, GF7(if they made it a little smaller) or similar mode from Olympus would offer it.
Do you really need flash with this camera?
Owen: Why does Oly have to make their stuff look like outdated SLRs? My car looks nothing like a Model T.
...so just a few...!
I don't like a lenscap. So it wille be the Sony RX100.
Marijus: HmmSONY NEX--6 78% - Silver award.Fujifilm X-M1 77% - GOLD award.Can you explain why?Price is almost the same.NEX-6 has viewfinde, Fuji - doesn't;
Better menu, better JPEG's etc.
Karroly: Great ! A Ricoh camera with roughly the same feature set than a Panasonic Lumix DMC ZS-8 (TZ-18) of...2011 !
...and my TZ5 of many years before....
"28 mm is too wide for most people". Funny that he recommends the GR IV that has a 28mm lens.....
uglier than ugly....
sabad: Imaging-resource says that (and is said to be a full stop more sensitive). That is very impressive.
Yes, I meant that the details at high ISO were less compared with the older RX100. And that's too bad.
Yes, but if you view their test photos real closely, the details are less at high ISO.
It is a pity that Dpreview did not make a critical remark about the price, compared with another compact like the great Ricoh GR V, that costs about the same.No, I don't own the Ricoh...
Wanganuilad: Never having heard of G-star, thought G-star RAW was some kind of special file...but no
Dutch / Italian company.