eivissa1

Thank you all for your answers!

It is very quite in the Netherlands concerning the availability of the GR..... Does anyone have any idea when the GR will be for sale over here?

Better menu, better JPEG's etc.

...and my TZ5 of many years before....

"28 mm is too wide for most people". Funny that he recommends the GR IV that has a 28mm lens.....

uglier than ugly....

It has been said before: il looks as if the new Sony produces softer pictures, but the details are still there. Imaging Resource said that the first Sony did more aggressive sharpening....

FotoKlein as well.

Yes, I meant that the details at high ISO were less compared with the older RX100. And that's too bad.

Yes, but if you view their test photos real closely, the details are less at high ISO.

It is a pity that Dpreview did not make a critical remark about the price, compared with another compact like the Ricoh GR V.
No, I don't own the Ricoh...

It is a pity that Dpreview did not make a critical remark about the price, compared with another compact like the great Ricoh GR V, that costs about the same.
No, I don't own the Ricoh...

Dutch / Italian company.

Compare them in the particular class....
Different lenses, sensor etc.

I think the result is disappointing, considering ISO 1250.

Why is it "in lots of ways" better than the GR?

Let me give the answer. The test images of DPreview prove that especially the Raw images at high ISO are better with the E-PM2. That is amazing if you compare the difference in sensor...

Why exactly is it in "lots of ways" better than the GR? I am very curious!

Thanks Doroga.

Really? http://blog.mingthein.com/2013/05/06/review-2013-ricoh-gr-digital-v/