Bilgy_no1

Bilgy_no1

Lives in Netherlands Amsterdam, Netherlands
Works as a Manager
Joined on May 22, 2008

Comments

Total: 74, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
On LG G4 puts focus on the camera post (78 comments in total)
In reply to:

Bilgy_no1: Excellent photographer's review of the G4, including some great shots and full resolution samples:

www.colbybrownphotography.com/gear-review-a-photographers-take-on-the-lg-g4/

This is a very impressive phone camera!

Did you all even read the article? He does give full disclosure that he was paid by LG to put the camera to the test. He provides straight out of the camera samples, even in Raw, for everyone to assess the quality. The samples are from a pre production model, and supposedly the image quality will even be improved in the final model.

I'm using a HTC One M8, and this looks much better. Not just because of the bigger sensor, but also because you can actually control exposure settings manually.

Direct link | Posted on May 2, 2015 at 15:20 UTC
On LG G4 puts focus on the camera post (78 comments in total)
In reply to:

JordanAT: First, as a G3 owner, I'm pleased that LG did not follow Samsung and HTC in putting bra straps on the back of their phone so they could look like Apple.

This is a nice upgrade and I hope it does well. The G3s camera was enough to allow me to leave the iOS world. (That's not why I left, but I delayed switching until I could get a phone with a decent camera)

If they would add a biometric sensor for security and figure out how to curb the device's lust for energy that would easily make it the best large-format device. (Well, that and factory root capability) Those two hardware quirks are probably the only two drawbacks/missing items on the G3 imho.

Those bra straps (nice word for it!) have to be there for the antennas in a metal design.

But for the sake of historical correctness: they already featured on the HTC One M7 and M8 that both appeared long before the iPhone 6. So if anything, Samsung and Apple are copying the HTC design.

Direct link | Posted on May 1, 2015 at 05:52 UTC
On LG G4 puts focus on the camera post (78 comments in total)

Excellent photographer's review of the G4, including some great shots and full resolution samples:

www.colbybrownphotography.com/gear-review-a-photographers-take-on-the-lg-g4/

This is a very impressive phone camera!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 30, 2015 at 22:51 UTC as 5th comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

Mike FL: I'm looking for replacing my SRL for a while, and interested in EM1 and XT1. But there is only one possible problem; "Fujifilm, Olympus and Panasonic are doomed...".

http://www.digitalcameranews.co.uk/2013/12/30/fujifilm-olympus-and-panasonic-are-doomed-according-to-credit-suisse-analyst/

We will see, but no one could stop it from coming when it comes as we saw it from the past...

I'd say just buy what you like, otherwise articles like this will become a self fulfilling prophecy...

Direct link | Posted on Nov 2, 2014 at 07:59 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Review preview (693 comments in total)
In reply to:

Timmbits: Can any MFT package rival this in size?
I mean, with a pancake zoom lens, a good one?

I figure that with all the criticism about the sensor, and if I am willing to accept this size for a "pocketable" camera (with larger sensor than RX100iii), could I also be served with an MFT instead?

Does anyone know, off the top of their head, a zoom lens that collapses to pancake size on power off, that is as bright as this one? (maybe f1.7 or so when thinking of equivalencies).

Why don't you go for the RX100 series from Sony then? They're way more compact than either the G1X mkII or any ILC, and still offer very good IQ...

Direct link | Posted on Aug 11, 2014 at 15:34 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III Review preview (838 comments in total)

Is there something strange going on with the NR on the M3? Looking at the noise samples on p. 11 of the review, the M3 does very poorly compared to the M2. Look at the highest ISO12800 setting, and the difference is shocking!

However, the M3 sample of the stamp also looks more enlarged than the M2 sample. Strange, because they have the same resolution...

Anyone have an idea?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 5, 2014 at 19:15 UTC as 37th comment | 1 reply
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Review preview (693 comments in total)
In reply to:

Timmbits: Can any MFT package rival this in size?
I mean, with a pancake zoom lens, a good one?

I figure that with all the criticism about the sensor, and if I am willing to accept this size for a "pocketable" camera (with larger sensor than RX100iii), could I also be served with an MFT instead?

Does anyone know, off the top of their head, a zoom lens that collapses to pancake size on power off, that is as bright as this one? (maybe f1.7 or so when thinking of equivalencies).

The Panasonic GM1 is smaller than this Canon and comes with a nice little 24-64mm equivalent pancake zoom lens. This lens, however, is only of the standard 3.5-5.6 aperture range. You can use the Olympus 45mm f/1.8 (90mm eq.) for a bit more range and great portraits.

The GM1 has gotten a very good review on this site and others. However, to get a zoom lens with a brightness that begins to approach the Canon you'd need to move up to the much more expensive 12-35mm f/2.8 from Panasonic or 12-40mm f/2.8 from Olympus. These are a stop slower at the wide angle, but a stop brighter at the tele end. They are also much more bulky and might fit better with a somewhat bigger m43 camera.

The GM1 with some bright pancakes will be very able and compact, but loses some convenience due to lens swapping. I guess the kitlens plus Olympus 45mm f/1.8 make a good travel package for city, landscapes, portraits, museum etc.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 3, 2014 at 19:35 UTC
On HTC One M8 Camera Review post (54 comments in total)

The 'UltraPixel' marketing would have had some credibility if the sensor was bigger than the usual 1/3" size. Theoretically, it's better to use more pixels and downsample in low light. At least in good light, you'd have more detail. Nokia's approach (now copied by Sony) is the way to go.

In general, exposure and colour is pretty good, so in good light you're left with some nice looking shots, on screen. But when you zoom in just a bit, the detail falls apart quickly.

Apart from IQ, my biggest gripe is with the operational speed of the One M8. When viewing a photo full screen, you tap the screen to display the options: they slowly slide into view from the bottom. It almost takes a second before the second row (Back, Home, App Switcher) buttons are available. The Back button is needed to get back to shooting mode, so it's a pain to wait for it to show up. The processor is fast enough to display this immediately, so the animation is useless and annoying.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 28, 2014 at 09:11 UTC as 4th comment
On Nokia Lumia 1520 camera review post (102 comments in total)
In reply to:

michael2011: Surprised it performs noticeably better than other phones including iPhone 5S which has a similarly sized sensor. My wife wants this phone and I now have no reservation recommending this.

Looking forward to your review on 1020's RAW capability...

BTW, your link to "Page 8: Image Quality Comparison (Bright Light" (and subsequent ones) takes me to a wrong page.

Actually, the sensor in the iPhone is not the same size as in the Nokia: 1/3" vs 1/2.5". Not a huge difference, but still the Nokia is capturing more light with its bigger sensor.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2014 at 21:53 UTC

You need to also compare to a 'regular' smartphone digital zoom to truly establish the usefulness of this technology.

You'd expect a compact camera with optical zoom to outperform a smartphone with digital. But if the latter provides something that's 'good enough' in terms of zoom, it can still be a viable alternative, The traditional digital zoom on smartphones doesn't achieve that, but this Nokia technology might.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 22, 2013 at 11:32 UTC as 16th comment
On iPhone 5s Studio Comparison article (263 comments in total)

Looking at the 'Print' size the advantages of the Nokia Pureview technology become really obvious: it is a much cleaner and more detailed image. Difference is significant even at these low ISO values, imagine what happens at ISO 400...

Direct link | Posted on Sep 27, 2013 at 12:29 UTC as 12th comment
On Hands-on with the 20.7MP Sony Xperia Z1 post (81 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mrrowe8: Actually it has beaten the Nokia , the Sony with expandable memory card slot can allow for transfer of cards , down load images to your computer and run through geniune fractals and nik software and poof noise reduced. .. The Nokia HAS NO expandable memory and you must use a cloud based system thus tying you to pay system .. So beaten and the addition of lenses means this is the real beginning of the end of PS Cameras .. For me it will depend in carrier ..

While the 'no expandable memory' remark is true, I'm sure that you can actually connect the Lumia 1020 to a PC with a USB-cable to transfer your files.

In terms of IQ, there's no good comparison yet between the two. So, it's too early to declare a winner in that department.

Where the Z1 does beat the Lumia 1020 hands down is in processing power. The Snapdragon S4 Plus may be sufficient to run Windows Phone 8 smoothly, it is not powerful enough to deal with all those pixels. Camera start-up time (around 5 sec) and shot-to-shot time (around 2 sec) are quite bad for such a camera centric smartphone.

I do believe that Nokia (or MS) should make an update of the 1020 quite soon after the release of the next WP update that should enable quadcore processors (Snapdragon 800, I guess).

Direct link | Posted on Sep 6, 2013 at 08:44 UTC
In reply to:

kadardr: "CEO-turned-whistleblower" is an oxymoron. Serious doubts of sincerity and shadows of his misconduct.

Hope he will be a novel writer excellent at fiction, because in the reality he will not be able to get a high position in the corporate world again.

He was no innocent child appointed to CEO, and unaware of corporate business conduct in Olympus. His appointment was a mistake from both parties.

You are kidding if you think of Olympus as an exception or a bad example, or even as a "Japanese or Asean model" of "misconduct".

His appointment was a mistake from both parties? I'm sure that the top clan in Olympus see the outcome as unwanted: their dirty laundry was exposed. But for the investors in the company it was a better thing for the scam to have been uncovered. Yes they lost money, but otherwise the company would have gone bust altogether.

I think it takes courage to operate from your ethical standards at that level. You're right that his chances at another job as CEO of an international company are pretty slim. That's why GBP10m should not be seen as greed. It's commendable that Woodford even gives away most of that.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 14, 2012 at 11:57 UTC

Nokia slow to catch up in smartphones?

Nokia was an early leader in that area, bringing many innovations. For years, Nokia was the market leader in smartphones with over 60% market share. The problem was that they were stuck with an OS created in the 1990s with the limitations of technology at that time.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 28, 2012 at 21:43 UTC as 6th comment
In reply to:

MPA1: My iPhone 5 should arrive this week so I can see for myself.

I use the camera as a visual note taker mainly - if I see a poster or magazine article or some such that I want to remember, I snap it and that reminds me to look it up later on.

Sometimes of course, your phone is the only camera you have - if I see Nessie or Lord Lucan, I won't be ashamed to capture the moment on my phone if that's all I have!

@Esa Tuunanen
I think the fact is that more and more people do not buy a dedicated camera, but rather use their phone for documenting their city trips, social events or just something they see on the streets.

These pictures' usefulness depends on whether you can recognize the faces and if it looks pleasant in small web viewing. It will of course not suffice for anything professional, but that's not what people are looking for.

In the meanwhile, simple compact sales have been declining for years. People just use their phones instead.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 25, 2012 at 10:46 UTC
In reply to:

photoaddict: DisplayMate just released article about iPhone 5 color display and not surprisingly, it outperformed Galaxy S by a large margin. iPhone 5 has perfect colors and has accurate gamut and doesn't need re-calibration out of the box.

http://www.displaymate.com/Smartphone_ShootOut_2.htm
Just the facts.

That comparison was written by Dr. Nick Riviera...

Direct link | Posted on Sep 25, 2012 at 10:32 UTC
On Nokia Lumia 920 promises PureView, but it’s no 808 article (182 comments in total)
In reply to:

Vitruvius: What can you expect when Nokia had to fake the footage for the ad with a DSLR....

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/right-click/nokia-apologizes-faked-footage-lumia-920-advertisement-211311325.html?_esi=1

http://www.theverge.com/2012/9/5/3294545/nokias-pureview-ads-are-fraudulent

Makes you wonder how often they do this and don't get caught. Shouldn't this be false advertising, like Sketchers?

http://m.gizmodo.com/5940836/nokia-apologizes-for-faking-the-pureview-video-and-shows-what-pureview-really-looks-like-in-a-new-video

So, it does really make a difference. I can see how they used other products to show the benefit of OIS. It happens all the time, and not just by Nokia. At least in this case, the technology really seems to work.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 8, 2012 at 18:45 UTC
On Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm F1.8 Preview preview (214 comments in total)
In reply to:

Cax: Just to clear things up for some people: The focal length of a lens has no impact whatsoever regarding "flattening" of a photo or anything related to that. What makes a portrait "flat" is the distance to the subject. People equate focal length to subject distance, and that's the source of this common misconception.

So yes, 75mm on 4/3 IS THE SAME AS 150mm on a 36x24mm camera in terms of anything relating to the photographic result. Focal length in itself means nothing. Please stop saying "75mm is 75mm" like we are all morons. 75mm is not an angle of view.

@ yabokkie

What you say on the measurements is true and very precise. However, the equivalence debate is getting a bit weird, because if you look at cameras sold the APS-C should be the standard and not Full Frame (which used to be called 'small frame' in comparison to the earlier standard formats).

What you propose would be a more precise classification of lenses, but I fear people cannot imagine what that a 16.4*/pupil-42 lens would give them in terms of image result...

Direct link | Posted on May 29, 2012 at 09:37 UTC
On Dpreview product database now mobile article (37 comments in total)
In reply to:

Octane: it took us 10-15 years to get web pages to look interesting and make them useful and use features our computers offer.

Now we have to find ways to get it all 'dumbed down' for mobile devices again (and create parallel mobile versions) until they become powerful enough to handle good web sites again. History repeats itself. :)

Actually, as a user I prefer to look at lightly designed websites. That does not mean 'dumbed down' at all.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 31, 2012 at 22:17 UTC
On Dpreview product database now mobile article (37 comments in total)

Great that you're working on the mobile access to the site. I still come across a lot of broken links, which I guess will just take some time to fix.

I like the layout of the the database articles. The sliding product images are nice.

Well done on the mobile version, but I hope you don't forget to work on the desktop version as well. It's a very heavy website, and I experience a lot of misloaded pages. Often, the image comparator tool in the reviews does not work well.

Maybe it's time for some extra bandwith with all these exciting new camera releases...

Direct link | Posted on Mar 31, 2012 at 22:15 UTC as 17th comment
Total: 74, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »