Bilgy_no1

Bilgy_no1

Lives in Netherlands Amsterdam, Netherlands
Works as a Manager
Joined on May 22, 2008

Comments

Total: 68, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
On article Microsoft Lumia 950 camera review (116 comments in total)
In reply to:

scandiskwindows9x: still functional and avalaiuble in windows 10 mobile the lumia panorama, just have certain problems with stitching but still functional

Lumia Panorama is not available for native Windows 10 phones like the Lumia 950(XL).

Link | Posted on Apr 20, 2016 at 22:12 UTC
On article Microsoft Lumia 950 camera review (116 comments in total)

I own the 950XL and I wholeheartedly agree with the comments about the missing Panorama feature.

I find it amazing that a company who developed and owns Photosynth, leaves a simple panorama mode out of their €699 Flagship phone. Especially since they offered that feature in previous phones (Nokia phones).

There are more unitelligible choices like that. E.g. Nokia was the first to popularize the 'double-tap-to-wake' feature, and used it on most of their phones in the past years. Now that almost every Android OEM has copied this feature, Microsoft decides to leave it out of their Flagship phones.

The 950 XL has become a decent phone, having received half a dozen updates since its launch. No more hot flushes, and spontaneous reboots like in the first days. The swipe keyboard now also works in the browser (although not flawless yet). Even the creaky back cover has somehow stopped creaking. Now they need to focus on fixing the final bugs and give us the Panorama mode...

Link | Posted on Apr 18, 2016 at 12:54 UTC as 7th comment
On article DxOMark Mobile report: HTC 10 (9 comments in total)
In reply to:

Peiasdf: Just the hardware bits, it should have the best camera out of all the big names. Still, 1/2.3" is tiny even by compact camera standard and hardly better than what other cellphones are using.

1/2.3" *IS* the compact camera standard!

Also: 1/2.3" is about 2x the sensor size of 1/3", which does make a difference in terms of light gathering.

Of course there are higher end compact camera's with 1/1.7" or 1" sensors, but they're not the standard and are typically at the higher end of the price spectrum.

Link | Posted on Apr 18, 2016 at 10:55 UTC
On article LG G4 puts focus on the camera (78 comments in total)
In reply to:

Bilgy_no1: Excellent photographer's review of the G4, including some great shots and full resolution samples:

www.colbybrownphotography.com/gear-review-a-photographers-take-on-the-lg-g4/

This is a very impressive phone camera!

Did you all even read the article? He does give full disclosure that he was paid by LG to put the camera to the test. He provides straight out of the camera samples, even in Raw, for everyone to assess the quality. The samples are from a pre production model, and supposedly the image quality will even be improved in the final model.

I'm using a HTC One M8, and this looks much better. Not just because of the bigger sensor, but also because you can actually control exposure settings manually.

Link | Posted on May 2, 2015 at 15:20 UTC
On article LG G4 puts focus on the camera (78 comments in total)
In reply to:

JordanAT: First, as a G3 owner, I'm pleased that LG did not follow Samsung and HTC in putting bra straps on the back of their phone so they could look like Apple.

This is a nice upgrade and I hope it does well. The G3s camera was enough to allow me to leave the iOS world. (That's not why I left, but I delayed switching until I could get a phone with a decent camera)

If they would add a biometric sensor for security and figure out how to curb the device's lust for energy that would easily make it the best large-format device. (Well, that and factory root capability) Those two hardware quirks are probably the only two drawbacks/missing items on the G3 imho.

Those bra straps (nice word for it!) have to be there for the antennas in a metal design.

But for the sake of historical correctness: they already featured on the HTC One M7 and M8 that both appeared long before the iPhone 6. So if anything, Samsung and Apple are copying the HTC design.

Link | Posted on May 1, 2015 at 05:52 UTC
On article LG G4 puts focus on the camera (78 comments in total)

Excellent photographer's review of the G4, including some great shots and full resolution samples:

www.colbybrownphotography.com/gear-review-a-photographers-take-on-the-lg-g4/

This is a very impressive phone camera!

Link | Posted on Apr 30, 2015 at 22:51 UTC as 5th comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

Mike FL: I'm looking for replacing my SRL for a while, and interested in EM1 and XT1. But there is only one possible problem; "Fujifilm, Olympus and Panasonic are doomed...".

http://www.digitalcameranews.co.uk/2013/12/30/fujifilm-olympus-and-panasonic-are-doomed-according-to-credit-suisse-analyst/

We will see, but no one could stop it from coming when it comes as we saw it from the past...

I'd say just buy what you like, otherwise articles like this will become a self fulfilling prophecy...

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2014 at 07:59 UTC
On article Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Review (707 comments in total)
In reply to:

Timmbits: Can any MFT package rival this in size?
I mean, with a pancake zoom lens, a good one?

I figure that with all the criticism about the sensor, and if I am willing to accept this size for a "pocketable" camera (with larger sensor than RX100iii), could I also be served with an MFT instead?

Does anyone know, off the top of their head, a zoom lens that collapses to pancake size on power off, that is as bright as this one? (maybe f1.7 or so when thinking of equivalencies).

Why don't you go for the RX100 series from Sony then? They're way more compact than either the G1X mkII or any ILC, and still offer very good IQ...

Link | Posted on Aug 11, 2014 at 15:34 UTC
On article Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III Review (862 comments in total)

Is there something strange going on with the NR on the M3? Looking at the noise samples on p. 11 of the review, the M3 does very poorly compared to the M2. Look at the highest ISO12800 setting, and the difference is shocking!

However, the M3 sample of the stamp also looks more enlarged than the M2 sample. Strange, because they have the same resolution...

Anyone have an idea?

Link | Posted on Aug 5, 2014 at 19:15 UTC as 47th comment | 1 reply
On article Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Review (707 comments in total)
In reply to:

Timmbits: Can any MFT package rival this in size?
I mean, with a pancake zoom lens, a good one?

I figure that with all the criticism about the sensor, and if I am willing to accept this size for a "pocketable" camera (with larger sensor than RX100iii), could I also be served with an MFT instead?

Does anyone know, off the top of their head, a zoom lens that collapses to pancake size on power off, that is as bright as this one? (maybe f1.7 or so when thinking of equivalencies).

The Panasonic GM1 is smaller than this Canon and comes with a nice little 24-64mm equivalent pancake zoom lens. This lens, however, is only of the standard 3.5-5.6 aperture range. You can use the Olympus 45mm f/1.8 (90mm eq.) for a bit more range and great portraits.

The GM1 has gotten a very good review on this site and others. However, to get a zoom lens with a brightness that begins to approach the Canon you'd need to move up to the much more expensive 12-35mm f/2.8 from Panasonic or 12-40mm f/2.8 from Olympus. These are a stop slower at the wide angle, but a stop brighter at the tele end. They are also much more bulky and might fit better with a somewhat bigger m43 camera.

The GM1 with some bright pancakes will be very able and compact, but loses some convenience due to lens swapping. I guess the kitlens plus Olympus 45mm f/1.8 make a good travel package for city, landscapes, portraits, museum etc.

Link | Posted on Aug 3, 2014 at 19:35 UTC
On article HTC One M8 Camera Review (54 comments in total)

The 'UltraPixel' marketing would have had some credibility if the sensor was bigger than the usual 1/3" size. Theoretically, it's better to use more pixels and downsample in low light. At least in good light, you'd have more detail. Nokia's approach (now copied by Sony) is the way to go.

In general, exposure and colour is pretty good, so in good light you're left with some nice looking shots, on screen. But when you zoom in just a bit, the detail falls apart quickly.

Apart from IQ, my biggest gripe is with the operational speed of the One M8. When viewing a photo full screen, you tap the screen to display the options: they slowly slide into view from the bottom. It almost takes a second before the second row (Back, Home, App Switcher) buttons are available. The Back button is needed to get back to shooting mode, so it's a pain to wait for it to show up. The processor is fast enough to display this immediately, so the animation is useless and annoying.

Link | Posted on Jul 28, 2014 at 09:11 UTC as 4th comment
On article Nokia Lumia 1520 camera review (102 comments in total)
In reply to:

michael2011: Surprised it performs noticeably better than other phones including iPhone 5S which has a similarly sized sensor. My wife wants this phone and I now have no reservation recommending this.

Looking forward to your review on 1020's RAW capability...

BTW, your link to "Page 8: Image Quality Comparison (Bright Light" (and subsequent ones) takes me to a wrong page.

Actually, the sensor in the iPhone is not the same size as in the Nokia: 1/3" vs 1/2.5". Not a huge difference, but still the Nokia is capturing more light with its bigger sensor.

Link | Posted on Apr 10, 2014 at 21:53 UTC
Total: 68, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »