ogl

ogl

Joined on Jan 28, 2010

Comments

Total: 406, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »

bacchanalia of Samsung 20 MP gadgets...

Direct link | Posted on May 1, 2013 at 10:11 UTC as 43rd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

d2f: I did not read anywhere that the new lens are AF, are they?

What about 12/2.8? 32/1.8 is with AF, but no info about 12 mm

Direct link | Posted on May 1, 2013 at 07:56 UTC

Are 12/2.8 with AF or not?

Direct link | Posted on May 1, 2013 at 07:55 UTC as 24th comment
On Just Posted: Fujifilm X20 review article (175 comments in total)

The result is real junk...XZ-2 is far better.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 30, 2013 at 07:10 UTC as 52nd comment
On Preview:ricoh-gr (295 comments in total)
In reply to:

Timmbits: Page 9, aside from the moiré where the Sigma excels, the Ricoh puts the Nikon to shame! The test-shot differences are striking.

I'm surprised to not see half the posts being criticism for no viewfinder... are those three people asleep?

There are 2 types of OVF.

Posted on Apr 23, 2013 at 16:15 UTC
On Preview:ricoh-gr (295 comments in total)

You can get 21, 28 and 35 mm with Ricoh GR.

Posted on Apr 17, 2013 at 05:51 UTC as 119th comment | 4 replies
On Preview:ricoh-gr (295 comments in total)

The lens of Ricoh kills Nikon Coolpix A.

Posted on Apr 17, 2013 at 05:50 UTC as 120th comment | 4 replies
On Preview:ricoh-gr (295 comments in total)

Video - H.264 format

Posted on Apr 17, 2013 at 05:42 UTC as 122nd comment | 1 reply
On Preview:ricoh-gr (295 comments in total)

Shutter - Mechanical, 300s-1/4000s

Wrong info in your specs, DPREVIEW

Posted on Apr 17, 2013 at 05:41 UTC as 125th comment | 1 reply

It's 100% killer of Coolpix A.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 17, 2013 at 05:36 UTC as 28th comment | 1 reply

I choose K-5IIs to compare and I see K-5IIs is simply better.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 28, 2013 at 04:32 UTC as 23rd comment | 5 replies

Absolutely empty camera. Real mediocrity

Direct link | Posted on Mar 21, 2013 at 05:52 UTC as 48th comment

epic fail

Direct link | Posted on Mar 21, 2013 at 05:51 UTC as 97th comment | 2 replies
On Fujifilm X100S Real-world Samples article (205 comments in total)
In reply to:

Peter62: The Hi-ISO images are phantastic!

I am highly impressed!

If the real ISO and marked ISO are the same...X100 has real ISO1000 at ISO1600-6400.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 20, 2013 at 20:03 UTC
In reply to:

PhotoHop: This looks interesting, but pricey I'm sure.
Maybe they can finally get rid of that "Tokina Glow".
I had the 11-16mm f/2.8...lens for me was too big and I had problems, surprisingly with it's focus speed. Sold it.
I am currently thrilled with my Sigma 15mm f/2.8 on my D90...easy distortion correction when you want it and cool effects when you don't. Little teeny thing to.

focus speed for ultra-wide lens...you really care about it?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 16, 2013 at 07:26 UTC
In reply to:

iudex: How about Pentax? Sigma used to make lenses for K-mount and this one looks like a perfect prime I would possibly buy for my K-30, so why not Pentax?

Sigma had already produced 30/1.4 for K-mount. Your answer is wrong.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 8, 2013 at 18:53 UTC

How to use new lenses 19/2.8, 30/2.8 and 60/2.8 mm in manual focus mode?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 8, 2013 at 18:51 UTC as 19th comment | 1 reply

I see only one BIG plus - size and weight. With 28 mm and 16 MP APS-C without AA filter - it's VERY cool, inconspicuous tool for street photography. But it's all.
The lenses must be f2 for street.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2013 at 18:51 UTC as 22nd comment
In reply to:

IrishhAndy: What a stupid camera. Overpriced and just one useless focal length.

They will produce A2 later with 36 mm and A3 with 50 mm. :) It's business.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2013 at 15:48 UTC
In reply to:

Osvaldo Cristo: It looks the camera a lot of posters are looking for according their critics for the previous models I read exactly here, in the front page of dpreview:

DX sensor, macro capabilities, reasonable WA, fast lens, crazy high ISO, raw capabilities,... oh surprise: I found again lots of complains!!!

Where is the crowd that asked that??

No any interesting thing at all. Not bad, but mediocrity. No any spices. It doesn't attract.
You list things that it's standart for photo camera. The lens is not fast, by the way.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2013 at 15:47 UTC
Total: 406, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »