ogl

ogl

Joined on Jan 28, 2010

Comments

Total: 557, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
On article Hands-on with the Fujifilm X70 (266 comments in total)

Wrong specs of GRII at http://www.dpreview.com/products/ricoh/compacts/ricoh_grii

117*63*34.7 mm vs 112.5*64.4*44.4 mm
251 g vs 340 g

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 20:40 UTC as 41st comment | 1 reply

Wrong specs of GRII at http://www.dpreview.com/products/ricoh/compacts/ricoh_grii

117*63*34.7 mm vs 112.5*64.4*44.4 mm
251 g vs 340 g

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 20:40 UTC as 14th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

SphericalAberration: Not enough to tempt Ricoh GR users to jump.
Do like the shutter speed dial and EV comp dial.
If it had a 40mm view or distance scale on the lens ring then it would have resulted in an instant order.

GRIII will have more MP and more features

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 20:35 UTC

http://img.photographyblog.com/reviews/ricoh_gr_ii/ricoh_gr_ii_18.jpg
jonasraskphotography.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/xt123641.jpg

I don't undestand how X70 could be smaller than Ricoh GR

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 20:34 UTC as 15th comment

B&W photos made in DXO or Photoshop from RAW colours photos from cameras without AA filter are much better. Better tonality, better shades of gray and black. DXO has very good simulation of B&W films. The result is outstanding. If you add some PP, it would be sweet spot.

Link | Posted on Jan 12, 2016 at 18:47 UTC as 10th comment | 5 replies

I see very soft pictures in JPEG and RAW from Leica M246 in studio and much sharper from K-3 and Leica Q.

Link | Posted on Jan 12, 2016 at 06:31 UTC as 32nd comment
On article Nikon fills in the blanks on professional grade D5 DSLR (554 comments in total)

ISO 3 280 000 is pure marketing move and pure SOFT ISO.

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 13:15 UTC as 37th comment | 1 reply
On article Nikon fills in the blanks on professional grade D5 DSLR (554 comments in total)

6500 USD....Hmmm....

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 07:06 UTC as 49th comment
In reply to:

sportyaccordy: Ultra wide? More like kinda sorta wide. I was hoping this would be for FX... that would have been something worth talking about

This lens covers from ultra-wide till wide-angle range. 14-16 mm are ultra-wide in 35 mm equiv. and 17-20 are wide angle.

Link | Posted on Jan 2, 2016 at 06:45 UTC
In reply to:

sportyaccordy: Ultra wide? More like kinda sorta wide. I was hoping this would be for FX... that would have been something worth talking about

Film lenses were called ultra-wide from 8 till 24 mm. Wide-angle - 25-35 mm.

Link | Posted on Dec 31, 2015 at 20:10 UTC
On article Inching forward? Canon PowerShot G5 X review posted (425 comments in total)

Really bad lens.

Link | Posted on Dec 14, 2015 at 18:26 UTC as 115th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

ogl: 90/2.4 is not bad, the rest lenses are not interesting

For most

Link | Posted on Dec 11, 2015 at 20:21 UTC

90/2.4 is not bad, the rest lenses are not interesting

Link | Posted on Dec 9, 2015 at 16:08 UTC as 26th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

ogl: The problem is that 645Z IR could be sold only to organizations under special order. Not for sale for private persons.
This camera (sensitivity from 350 till 1100 nm) could be called as some kind of monochrome too. It could be used for art photos, not only for technical tasks.
The camera has broadband infra-red sensitivity characteristics that covers from the visible region to 1100nm.

850-1100 nm is not visible region :)

Link | Posted on Dec 3, 2015 at 07:34 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: Paid for upgrade and found nothing new for me. The results from my K200D and K-5IIs made in with 8 version have no any difference.

I have no any problems at all with version 8.

Link | Posted on Dec 3, 2015 at 04:33 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: The problem is that 645Z IR could be sold only to organizations under special order. Not for sale for private persons.
This camera (sensitivity from 350 till 1100 nm) could be called as some kind of monochrome too. It could be used for art photos, not only for technical tasks.
The camera has broadband infra-red sensitivity characteristics that covers from the visible region to 1100nm.

I said - some kind of monochrome. Have a look at spectral sensitivity.

Link | Posted on Dec 2, 2015 at 15:12 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: The problem is that 645Z IR could be sold only to organizations under special order. Not for sale for private persons.
This camera (sensitivity from 350 till 1100 nm) could be called as some kind of monochrome too. It could be used for art photos, not only for technical tasks.
The camera has broadband infra-red sensitivity characteristics that covers from the visible region to 1100nm.

Have a look at examples http://news.ricoh-imaging.co.jp/rim_info/2015/20151127_009960.html

Link | Posted on Dec 2, 2015 at 12:35 UTC

The problem is that 645Z IR could be sold only to organizations under special order. Not for sale for private persons.
This camera (sensitivity from 350 till 1100 nm) could be called as some kind of monochrome too. It could be used for art photos, not only for technical tasks.
The camera has broadband infra-red sensitivity characteristics that covers from the visible region to 1100nm.

Link | Posted on Dec 2, 2015 at 10:33 UTC as 10th comment | 8 replies

Paid for upgrade and found nothing new for me. The results from my K200D and K-5IIs made in with 8 version have no any difference.

Link | Posted on Dec 2, 2015 at 10:30 UTC as 8th comment | 3 replies
On article Studio tests and samples: Leica SL (beta) (753 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: Looks soft for me. Leica Q' and Nikon D800E samples are sharper

I thought that Leica's zooms are sharp like primes :)

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2015 at 18:31 UTC
Total: 557, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »