ogl

ogl

Joined on Jan 28, 2010

Comments

Total: 422, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III First Impressions Review preview (2970 comments in total)

GX1 Mark II looks much better at low ISO

Direct link | Posted on May 31, 2014 at 13:52 UTC as 263rd comment
On Samsung NX Mini real-world samples gallery article (143 comments in total)

It's strange, but samples are really good. :) Good job of 1" sensor in hands of Samsung.

Direct link | Posted on May 5, 2014 at 09:31 UTC as 24th comment | 1 reply

Not interesting photos

Direct link | Posted on May 4, 2014 at 16:34 UTC as 55th comment
On Hands on with the Pentax 645Z article (660 comments in total)
In reply to:

mike kobal: Sorry, but a sensor size of 44x33mm cannot be called medium format by traditional definition.
This is a APMFS-C sized sensor (Advanced Photo Medium Format System type-C)

By the way, m4/3 is very close to APS-C in terms of IQ with very small size of bodies.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 14:18 UTC
On Hands on with the Pentax 645Z article (660 comments in total)
In reply to:

falconeyes: This will become the camera with best image quality ever made up to today!

(in terms of DxOMark, it should score around 105 Overall Score and 50MP, even though the jump from 35mm is small (0.79 crop)).

I hope that Ricoh releases the marketing money needed to make this a bold statement for Pentax being overall leader in IQ. The brand needs a bit of hype to make a come back, esp. in the US.

Falconeyes is scientist, no any sense to argue against him.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 14:16 UTC
On Hands on with the Pentax 645Z article (660 comments in total)
In reply to:

mike kobal: Sorry, but a sensor size of 44x33mm cannot be called medium format by traditional definition.
This is a APMFS-C sized sensor (Advanced Photo Medium Format System type-C)

WRONG. Any sensor bigger than 24*36 mm is medium format.
Learn it. Digital era of medium format offers different standarts of middle format sensors. Forget about film time.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 14:13 UTC
On Hands on with the Pentax 645Z article (660 comments in total)

By the way, it's the FIRST in the world MF camera with video mode.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 13:12 UTC as 148th comment
On Ricoh announces medium-format Pentax 645Z article (160 comments in total)
In reply to:

iae aa eia: I think it was supposed to be already mirroless, with a nice EVF, and its sensor 56 x 41.5mm, as it was the 645 film frame area. 33 x 44mm looks like what the APS format is to the 135 full-frame, a cropped sensor to cut their investment some slack. Not a true medium-medium. Just medium.

44*33 is one of standart of MF sensor sizes.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 04:46 UTC
On Ricoh announces medium-format Pentax 645Z article (160 comments in total)
In reply to:

iae aa eia: I think it was supposed to be already mirroless, with a nice EVF, and its sensor 56 x 41.5mm, as it was the 645 film frame area. 33 x 44mm looks like what the APS format is to the 135 full-frame, a cropped sensor to cut their investment some slack. Not a true medium-medium. Just medium.

I had made photos with 6*6 film for several years. :) Rolleiflex 2.8F.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 04:45 UTC
On Ricoh announces medium-format Pentax 645Z article (160 comments in total)
In reply to:

iae aa eia: I think it was supposed to be already mirroless, with a nice EVF, and its sensor 56 x 41.5mm, as it was the 645 film frame area. 33 x 44mm looks like what the APS format is to the 135 full-frame, a cropped sensor to cut their investment some slack. Not a true medium-medium. Just medium.

Dear friend, 56*41.5 mm is a film size. Digital era has new digital medium format sensor sizes. 44*33 mm is the standart for digital MF cameras. The crop-factor is used just for calculating focal ranges.
The result from old 11 MP FF camera was not worse than the scanned 56*41.5 mm scanned film. What are you talking about? 51 MP 44*33 mm CMOS sensor is way ahead of scanned film.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 03:39 UTC

We know that the lenses are sharp.
The design is really attractive and shocking. New FOVEON sensor.
I see SIGMA is only one interesting company now - innovative design and NEW sensor. Not boring retro-look or classical stuff from another brands.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2014 at 05:45 UTC as 22nd comment

It's boring to death. Ugly LQ plastic with 18 MP.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2014 at 05:41 UTC as 56th comment | 1 reply

Too much Photoshop. Unreal photos of unreal life.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 26, 2014 at 16:29 UTC as 210th comment | 4 replies
On Tamas Dezso offers glimpse into post-Communist Romania article (238 comments in total)

EU keeps killing Romania, Bulgaria, Greece, Latvia, Estonia.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 19, 2014 at 08:16 UTC as 88th comment | 24 replies

Lower resolution than A7 and D610 and looks weaker than K-3.
Not low noise. Not impressed IQ.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 28, 2013 at 09:50 UTC as 36th comment | 7 replies
On Nikon Df preview (2817 comments in total)

It looks like the camera which made from 3 different cameras of different time. Photoeclecticism. Bad work of designer. Set-off. No style, not conceptual.
Even new Fuji, Sony A7 or Panasoniс are more stylish.

Is it real to switch this camera by one arm?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 5, 2013 at 06:14 UTC as 913th comment | 2 replies
On Nikon Df combines classic design with modern technology article (313 comments in total)

It looks like the camera which made from 3 different cameras of different time. Photoeclecticism. Bad work of designer. Set-off. No style, not conceptual.
Even new Fuji, Sony A7 or Panasoniс are more stylish.

Is it real to switch this camera by one arm?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 5, 2013 at 06:10 UTC as 111th comment
On Pentax K-3 preview (961 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: DPREVIEW - why did you put 560 frames with battery?

720 frames without flash and 560 with 50% flash.

I know. I have K-5IIs. But 560 frames is not correct info from DPR.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 10, 2013 at 05:16 UTC
On Pentax K-3 preview (961 comments in total)

DPREVIEW - why did you put 560 frames with battery?

720 frames without flash and 560 with 50% flash.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 9, 2013 at 10:50 UTC as 192nd comment | 3 replies
On Pentax K-3 preview (961 comments in total)
In reply to:

Greg Lovern: Regarding the battery life, that battery was introduced with the K-7 back in 2009. Maybe now, 4 years later, they'll be able to fit more capacity in an updated battery of the same size?

It means that K-7, K-5 and K-5II's users could upgrade cameras without buying new battery.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 9, 2013 at 10:49 UTC
Total: 422, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »