ogl

ogl

Joined on Jan 28, 2010

Comments

Total: 503, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Eric Hensel: I've never understood why they don't fit the O-ring to the camera-side mount --sealing any lens attached, at one of it's most vulnerable spots.

Yes. I don't believe - I know. :) The mount of camera will have much more frictions and contacts with lens mount when you change one lens to another. Yes...If you use just 1-2 lenses, it won't be problem. IMO. But the camera is for different users. I have 10 lenses, for example. And I use all.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 13, 2015 at 12:56 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: OVF 100% 0.8x - not lower
36 MP sensor
wider AF points than in APS-C cameras
No AA filter
It's enough for me

24 MP is old sensor, 36 MP is better in terms of DR and noise.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 13, 2015 at 11:10 UTC

DFA ZOOMS are more important for future FF camera now, than fixed lenses. New fixed lenses will be on 2016-2017.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 13, 2015 at 09:49 UTC as 7th comment

OVF 100% 0.8x - not lower
36 MP sensor
wider AF points than in APS-C cameras
No AA filter
It's enough for me

Direct link | Posted on Feb 13, 2015 at 09:46 UTC as 39th comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

Eric Hensel: I've never understood why they don't fit the O-ring to the camera-side mount --sealing any lens attached, at one of it's most vulnerable spots.

Who will replace? Service? It's useless idea.
I think it's silicone ring. This ring is strongly stuck at the mount of lens. I see this at my DFA100 macro WR.
It will be made in the same way at the mount of camera. How to replace it at home during warranty period? You invent the problem for manufacturer and for users. :)

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2015 at 19:17 UTC
In reply to:

Eric Hensel: I've never understood why they don't fit the O-ring to the camera-side mount --sealing any lens attached, at one of it's most vulnerable spots.

Such ring will wear out much quicker than at lens mount.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2015 at 08:37 UTC

Correct mistake with dimensions

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2015 at 08:36 UTC as 4th comment

What kind of hood?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 10, 2015 at 07:18 UTC as 12th comment | 1 reply

Diameter 41 mm (1.61″)
Length 71 mm (2.8″)
Mistake in specs diameter 71 mm, length 41 mm

Direct link | Posted on Feb 10, 2015 at 07:08 UTC as 14th comment | 1 reply
On Canon EOS 5DS / SR First Impressions Review preview (3385 comments in total)

Noise machine?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 06:33 UTC as 827th comment

God, I want to live till I could take Pentax FF camera.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 5, 2015 at 10:08 UTC as 62nd comment
On Olympus 8mm F1.8 'pro' fisheye in development article (29 comments in total)

Is there any sense to make f1.8 for fish-eye?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 5, 2015 at 07:57 UTC as 8th comment | 9 replies
In reply to:

Zvonimir Tosic: Pentax HD 70-200 has a new super-fast SDM motor, not DC.
And as one user said, this new 70-200mm F2.8 lens may just out perform anything ever made in that classification of lenses by any manufacturer.
It has 4 anomalous dispersion lenses + 2 ED lenses + 2 super ED lenses: for a total of 8 fancy ED style lenses, covered in all the latest and best coatings in the industry. Pentax pulled out all the stops on this one.

This lens is a game changer in this category.

DC is just type of motor. It could be RING motor.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 5, 2015 at 04:55 UTC
On Samyang launches 135mm f/2.0 lens for stills and video article (151 comments in total)
In reply to:

ealvarez: Is this manual focus lens? $599? I can get 135mm f2L canon for about $600 used and Nikon 180 f2.8D even cheaper used.. I don't share much of the enthusiasm. Maybe I would if I was Sony E-mount shooter.

You can. But if you're Canon user. :)))

Direct link | Posted on Jan 13, 2015 at 05:27 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: Good lenses, but too big...IMO.

Flange focal distance of FE bayonet is 18 mm, bayonet A is 44.5 mm. There is the physics.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 10, 2015 at 11:27 UTC

Good lenses, but too big...IMO.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 10, 2015 at 10:29 UTC as 66th comment | 11 replies
On Rest in peace in the photoshop composite challenge (14 comments in total)

What is the main idea to do that?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 29, 2014 at 08:11 UTC as 2nd comment
In reply to:

ogl: 645z is 8500 USD.

But Pentax offers 18 lenses...Is it limited?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 19, 2014 at 10:36 UTC
In reply to:

princewolf: I can't buy one, so doesn't interest me. Waiting for Sony or Fuji to come up with that fixed-lens medium-format mirror-less for under 5000 bucks. Might be a long wait :)

Buy 645D - real CCD. Only 4500 USD

Direct link | Posted on Dec 17, 2014 at 19:58 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: 645z is 8500 USD.

How do you know it? Do you compare? No.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 17, 2014 at 19:56 UTC
Total: 503, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »