ogl

ogl

Joined on Jan 28, 2010

Comments

Total: 502, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

ogl: Paid for upgrade and found nothing new for me. The results from my K200D and K-5IIs made in with 8 version have no any difference.

I have no any problems at all with version 8.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 3, 2015 at 04:33 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: The problem is that 645Z IR could be sold only to organizations under special order. Not for sale for private persons.
This camera (sensitivity from 350 till 1100 nm) could be called as some kind of monochrome too. It could be used for art photos, not only for technical tasks.
The camera has broadband infra-red sensitivity characteristics that covers from the visible region to 1100nm.

I said - some kind of monochrome. Have a look at spectral sensitivity.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 2, 2015 at 15:12 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: The problem is that 645Z IR could be sold only to organizations under special order. Not for sale for private persons.
This camera (sensitivity from 350 till 1100 nm) could be called as some kind of monochrome too. It could be used for art photos, not only for technical tasks.
The camera has broadband infra-red sensitivity characteristics that covers from the visible region to 1100nm.

Have a look at examples http://news.ricoh-imaging.co.jp/rim_info/2015/20151127_009960.html

Direct link | Posted on Dec 2, 2015 at 12:35 UTC

The problem is that 645Z IR could be sold only to organizations under special order. Not for sale for private persons.
This camera (sensitivity from 350 till 1100 nm) could be called as some kind of monochrome too. It could be used for art photos, not only for technical tasks.
The camera has broadband infra-red sensitivity characteristics that covers from the visible region to 1100nm.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 2, 2015 at 10:33 UTC as 10th comment | 8 replies

Paid for upgrade and found nothing new for me. The results from my K200D and K-5IIs made in with 8 version have no any difference.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 2, 2015 at 10:30 UTC as 7th comment | 3 replies
On article Studio tests and samples: Leica SL (beta) (750 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: Looks soft for me. Leica Q' and Nikon D800E samples are sharper

I thought that Leica's zooms are sharp like primes :)

Direct link | Posted on Oct 28, 2015 at 18:31 UTC
On article Studio tests and samples: Leica SL (beta) (750 comments in total)

Looks soft for me. Leica Q' and Nikon D800E samples are sharper

Direct link | Posted on Oct 28, 2015 at 18:00 UTC as 141st comment | 3 replies
On article And the winners are: DPReview Awards 2015 (392 comments in total)
In reply to:

Niko Tod: How is exactly Samsung NX-1 better than 7D Mark II?
Better AF? Better battery life? Bigger buffer? Bigger lens choice? Better IQ?
This one is absolute mystery to me!

28 MP vs 20 MP - Samsung has more details + no AA filter, 15 fps vs 9.5 fps, almost the same buffer - 22 RAW vs 24-25 RAW, 20 RAW+JPEG vs 18 RAW+JPEG, IQ is better, better level of noise, better video, AF is not worse.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 7, 2015 at 17:26 UTC

Sony Mavica-MVC-FD91 had f/1.8-3.2 lens, by the way :)))

Direct link | Posted on Oct 4, 2015 at 09:28 UTC as 19th comment

I had wanted to buy E-330...But, bought *ist DS, because I had K-mount and M42 lenses...:)

Direct link | Posted on Oct 4, 2015 at 09:25 UTC as 20th comment
In reply to:

AlexReusch: I had two Ricoh WG-4, both leaked water within minutes in shallow water. If Ricoh did not change something fundamental on the design of the locking mechanism, I would not recommend this camera. The bad experience I had with the WG-4 almost ruined two of my holidays (in terms of photos). I never had issues with other brands/models (like Panasonic TF4 etc.)
https://plus.google.com/+AlexReusch/posts/aTmWGviS8xN

I had W10 and had no any problems for many years.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 29, 2015 at 18:48 UTC

The same price as Tamron is cool. 1297 USD
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/845350-REG/Tamron_SP_24_70mm_f_2_8_DI.html

Direct link | Posted on Sep 25, 2015 at 04:46 UTC as 53rd comment
In reply to:

ogl: It seems to me -- it's old Zeiss for C and N in NEW BODY.

Checked. New lenses have new optical design.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 11, 2015 at 15:47 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: Made by Cosina in Japan or China?

ZF /ZE series are never made in Germany

Direct link | Posted on Sep 11, 2015 at 14:18 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: It seems to me -- it's old Zeiss for C and N in NEW BODY.

It was 50/2 also and 85/1.4. Check Zeiss ZF line of lenses.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 11, 2015 at 14:17 UTC

Made by Cosina in Japan or China?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 11, 2015 at 06:40 UTC as 29th comment | 6 replies

It seems to me -- it's old Zeiss for C and N in NEW BODY.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 11, 2015 at 06:40 UTC as 30th comment | 4 replies

It's not for photo.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 8, 2015 at 10:21 UTC as 95th comment | 1 reply

Jun Hirakawa's work? http://camerapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Hirakawa_Jun

Direct link | Posted on Sep 2, 2015 at 13:57 UTC as 69th comment
In reply to:

AlanG: I'm sure it's a nice camera but to me it is a stretch to call it medium format. Even 6x4.5 barely seemed to qualify.

All digital formats which bigger than 24x36 mm are MIDDLE FORMAT. Never was film 60x45 mm - the real size 56x41.5 mm. A lot of sensors are close to such size. But it's not important with modern technologies. SONY 50 MP 44x33 mm sensor is better than bigger CCD sensors.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 26, 2015 at 16:16 UTC
Total: 502, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »