ogl

ogl

Joined on Jan 28, 2010

Comments

Total: 547, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

ogl: Who are the buyers of this system...?

My friends with money use smart-phones to take pictures :)))

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2016 at 07:05 UTC

Who are the buyers of this system...?

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2016 at 06:17 UTC as 59th comment | 11 replies
On article Retro through-and-through: Fujifilm X-Pro2 Review (2444 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: I see Nikon D5500 beats Fuji in terms of noise...

The problem that we don't know if Fuji's ISO6400 is real ISO...:) Fujifilm X100's marked ISO6400 is real 1076...
http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Fujifilm/FinePix-X100---Measurements

Link | Posted on Mar 15, 2016 at 15:09 UTC
On article Retro through-and-through: Fujifilm X-Pro2 Review (2444 comments in total)

I see Nikon D5500 beats Fuji in terms of noise...

Link | Posted on Mar 15, 2016 at 05:39 UTC as 92nd comment | 3 replies
On article Retro through-and-through: Fujifilm X-Pro2 Review (2444 comments in total)

1700 USD for APS-C camera when there are FF cameras from 1200 tilll 1900 USD....

Link | Posted on Mar 15, 2016 at 05:36 UTC as 93rd comment | 3 replies
On article Canon announces budget-friendly EOS Rebel T6 (1300D) (931 comments in total)

For what?

Link | Posted on Mar 11, 2016 at 07:00 UTC as 65th comment
On article Great Eight: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 review (529 comments in total)

subject tracking is failed.

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2016 at 16:25 UTC as 132nd comment
On article Great Eight: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 review (529 comments in total)

I would say that no any good photos from 16 samples in continuous shooting...

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2016 at 16:23 UTC as 133rd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

ogl: Quattro H is compatible with Sigma FF lenses only

It's said in Sigma's official data sheets. APS-H camera is compatible with FF Sigma lenses, APS-C with APS-C lenses.

Easy to understand such simple fact. No any mask or APS-C mode for APS-H camera. Sigma OFFERS two different solutions.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2016 at 11:37 UTC

Quattro H is compatible with Sigma FF lenses only

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 21:05 UTC as 141st comment | 3 replies

Foveon Cmos 26,6 x 17,9 mm Foveon X3 Quattro. 25 MP = 45 MP Bayer eq.
Foveon Cmos 23,5 x 15,5 mm Foveon X3 Quattro, 20 MP = 29 MP Bayer eq.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 21:04 UTC as 142nd comment
On article The long, difficult road to Pentax full-frame (616 comments in total)
In reply to:

ronniemac: Barney, that is one excellent article. Thanks for putting it together.

Like you I do worry about the cost of the best new zooms, but hey, it will be less than a 645z with its new lenses. Is it worth mentioning that, when I last counted, Pentax currently offers 22 full frame lenses, some are FA, some F DA, and quite a few primes are DA which may require stopping down although I have seen evidence to the contrary. Granted that a few of these are not yet in the shops, but I live in hope. Hopefully Sigma, Tamron, Samyang etc will help out, although it will only be if there is financial benefit.

Like you, I started out with an MX. You must have bought an old one as surely you're much younger than that! I still enjoy the K-3 II but Pentax seem to have identified their target market correctly. Although not at the front of the Q (pun), I will indulge myself with a K-1. For Pentax's sake, I hope others do also. Lots of old glass to have fun with too.

Thanks again, nice article.

http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/other/2006/02/17/3233.html please, here is info. :)

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 20:00 UTC
On article The long, difficult road to Pentax full-frame (616 comments in total)
In reply to:

ronniemac: Barney, that is one excellent article. Thanks for putting it together.

Like you I do worry about the cost of the best new zooms, but hey, it will be less than a 645z with its new lenses. Is it worth mentioning that, when I last counted, Pentax currently offers 22 full frame lenses, some are FA, some F DA, and quite a few primes are DA which may require stopping down although I have seen evidence to the contrary. Granted that a few of these are not yet in the shops, but I live in hope. Hopefully Sigma, Tamron, Samyang etc will help out, although it will only be if there is financial benefit.

Like you, I started out with an MX. You must have bought an old one as surely you're much younger than that! I still enjoy the K-3 II but Pentax seem to have identified their target market correctly. Although not at the front of the Q (pun), I will indulge myself with a K-1. For Pentax's sake, I hope others do also. Lots of old glass to have fun with too.

Thanks again, nice article.

By the way, first Pentax FF digital camera had name K-1 too. http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/static/image/2006/02/17/k101l.jpg
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/static/image/2006/02/17/pentax1_02l.jpg
https://c1.staticflickr.com/7/6137/5943421002_520c9f447e.jpg

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 19:56 UTC
On article The long, difficult road to Pentax full-frame (616 comments in total)
In reply to:

moawkwrd: "The K-1 becomes the first conventional DSLR to offer a stabilized full-frame sensor."

Um, what about the Sony A900 and A850?

EDIT: I see many others have pointed this out. Why is DPReview terrible at fact checking? Are Pentax themselves claiming this or is it just DPReview being awful yet again?

It's mistake. Say it to the author.

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 16:43 UTC
On article The long, difficult road to Pentax full-frame (616 comments in total)
In reply to:

iAPX: As usually for Pentax: where are the lenses?!?

Yes, fast full frame lenses, that don't need to be stopped-down, or cropped to work.

Reminds me of my Pentax K10D that was perfect to use old lenses, but didn't have fast lenses, and thus lost it's value to be sold at a bargain, to be replaced by a Nikon D300 (that I still use today!) with fast lenses.

FA31/1.8, FA35/2, FA43/1.9, FA50/1.4 and 77/1.8 are in production.

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 15:58 UTC
On article The long, difficult road to Pentax full-frame (616 comments in total)
In reply to:

dansclic: I understand how emotion CAN drive a buy option for pentax. But from a certain price tag, émotion makes room for réflexion and reflexion leads people to more established lines which have an enormous Lens program. As you said, buying thé 15-30 and 70-200 make à lot of money ! They should have proposed a 28 mm, 35 mm and a basic 85 and maybe 70-200 f4. This basic equipment could meet more customers.....

FA31, FA35, FA43, FA50, FA77, DFA50 macro, DFA100 macro are in production.

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 15:56 UTC
On article The long, difficult road to Pentax full-frame (616 comments in total)
In reply to:

moawkwrd: "The K-1 becomes the first conventional DSLR to offer a stabilized full-frame sensor."

Um, what about the Sony A900 and A850?

EDIT: I see many others have pointed this out. Why is DPReview terrible at fact checking? Are Pentax themselves claiming this or is it just DPReview being awful yet again?

Discontinued and never had 5-axis SR system.

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 15:54 UTC
In reply to:

hjr13: I was hoping for a 24-105, that extra 4 mm is a big difference to me.

24-105 for 500USD?

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 10:01 UTC
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 First Impressions Review (975 comments in total)
In reply to:

eyeswideshut: Sometimes it's the little things in life - like an LED over the mount. I mean how brilliant is that!
Oh and a great camera, too! Congratulations Pentax

It's really good thing - I have not good vision and sometimes it's hard to mount lens to camera without better light. Funny, but it's true. As for night or bad light condition - this LED helps a lot.

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 06:40 UTC
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 First Impressions Review (975 comments in total)

The main feature of K-1 is the FIRST Pentax FF camera. And it's extremely well. We have been waiting for 15 years. Somebody didn't live till this moment. I don't care about specs. K-1 has FF sensor and I don't see sense to waste time for long discussing of pros and cons. I can put all my FA LIMITED on K-1 and I will be happy. My congratulations to all Pentaxian!

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 06:12 UTC as 139th comment
Total: 547, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »