ozturert: Look at "Cons". They have been more or less the same since XPro1:Critical detail at 100% suffersWaxy-looking skin in high ISO imagesAF tends to huntX-Trans sensor design limits Raw-converter choiceAnd lens... X100s and X100T's lenses were good but not very good in my opinion. Strange though, as Fuji's X-series prime lenses are usually very good (except from 18mm f2.0) but X100s and this X70 are not as good as rivals.
maybe they can't do good compact lenses for compact bodies.
ogl: The lens is the main part of the camera. If there is no sharpness at all, how to use such camera?
I can repeat one more - Good photo with good sharpness will be better. Good photo with bad sharpness won't be better. Bad photo will be bad with any lens.
Fujifilm X100 - ISO1600 is real ISO1000, ISO3200 is real ISO1012, ISO6400 is real ISO1076.
Don't compare apples with oranges. You try to avoid discussion to another side. Good photo with good sharpness will be better. Good photo with bad sharpness won't be better. As for high ISO - Fujifilm X100 had ISO trick - indicated ISO and real ISO had a big difference. It's hard to say anything about X70 without DXO tests. Anyway, photography needs light. No light - no photo. You can make good noise reduction in RAW converter with GR or Nikon A, but you can't change lens of X70 :)
as for me, it's sharpness of mediocre zoom lens, not fixed one.
The lens is the main part of the camera. If there is no sharpness at all, how to use such camera?
ogl: P&S camera's IQ.
Lower than 1 stop in terms of noise. But I say about IQ.
Sony's ISO400 is real ISO301, screen SNR18% -28.7 dB, ISO400 of MX-1 is real ISO356, SNR18% - 25.9 dB. Sony has the same SNR18% at ISO800 (real ISO597). It means the difference of SN is the diffrence between real ISO597 and ISO356. It's lower than 1 stop.
I hope that 1" sensor is better than 1/1.7"...But it's very close. Maybe JPEG from RAW could be better?
P&S camera's IQ.
As for me 12800 is the limit
A6000 has sharper pictures
ogl: Who are the buyers of this system...?
Nothing is wrong, it should be the necessity to buy
My friends with money use smart-phones to take pictures :)))
Who are the buyers of this system...?
ogl: I see Nikon D5500 beats Fuji in terms of noise...
The problem that we don't know if Fuji's ISO6400 is real ISO...:) Fujifilm X100's marked ISO6400 is real 1076...http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Fujifilm/FinePix-X100---Measurements
I see Nikon D5500 beats Fuji in terms of noise...
1700 USD for APS-C camera when there are FF cameras from 1200 tilll 1900 USD....
subject tracking is failed.
I would say that no any good photos from 16 samples in continuous shooting...