ogl

ogl

Joined on Jan 28, 2010

Comments

Total: 446, showing: 281 – 300
« First‹ Previous1314151617Next ›Last »
In reply to:

arpikusz: 50mm F1.8 Mmmmm. Like!

Maybe 50/1.8 is standart for FF?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2012 at 16:50 UTC
In reply to:

arpikusz: 50mm F1.8 Mmmmm. Like!

77 at FF is not odd? A lot of us uses FA50/1.4 and FA50/1.7 and A50/1.2 with APS-C camera and like it...Cheap short tele with good IQ.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2012 at 16:49 UTC
In reply to:

Alizarine: 4-camera lineup...

Q (compact ILC)
K-01 (APS-C MILC)
K-letter (APS-C SLR)
K-number (APS-C SLR)

All compatible with 1 mount! woohoo! (well the K-to-Q adapter solves the last). Fuji might have the looks, but Pentax retains the function.

I hope FF with K-mount too.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2012 at 16:48 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: It looks like agony...Too many efforts to put more features into small retro body.
But...What can we expect from IQ and Olympus lenses?
Rather mediocre results. Crop 2 is forever. It's unreal to deceive physics.

Consumer level.

Is this camera Attractive? Yes. Well-made? Yes.
Good featured? Yeahhh...
But it's all marketing tricks. Game.
The new cameras are soulless. X-Pro1, OM-D are not real retro cameras, it's fake.

The retro flirting of camera-makers and retro-design makes me sick.
It's like peanut politician.

Yes...It's good camera for anybody. But it's boring camera. Like D800.

between OM-D and D800 is abyss...:)

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2012 at 15:36 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: It looks like agony...Too many efforts to put more features into small retro body.
But...What can we expect from IQ and Olympus lenses?
Rather mediocre results. Crop 2 is forever. It's unreal to deceive physics.

Consumer level.

Is this camera Attractive? Yes. Well-made? Yes.
Good featured? Yeahhh...
But it's all marketing tricks. Game.
The new cameras are soulless. X-Pro1, OM-D are not real retro cameras, it's fake.

The retro flirting of camera-makers and retro-design makes me sick.
It's like peanut politician.

Yes...It's good camera for anybody. But it's boring camera. Like D800.

D800 is just 36 MP upgrade of D3X/D700. Is it cool? Yes. And it's FF.:) But...I mean mainstream pattern of thoughts...

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2012 at 15:35 UTC

M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-50mm 1:3.5-6.3 - funny...Why so slow at the long end?
f6.3 is already diffraction limit for 16 MP crop 2x sensor.
I don't catch the logic - it's only weather sealed lens for m4/3 - right?
But why it's so slow?

DOF equivalent at 35 mm - 100/F13...:)

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2012 at 12:28 UTC as 26th comment

It looks like agony...Too many efforts to put more features into small retro body.
But...What can we expect from IQ and Olympus lenses?
Rather mediocre results. Crop 2 is forever. It's unreal to deceive physics.

Consumer level.

Is this camera Attractive? Yes. Well-made? Yes.
Good featured? Yeahhh...
But it's all marketing tricks. Game.
The new cameras are soulless. X-Pro1, OM-D are not real retro cameras, it's fake.

The retro flirting of camera-makers and retro-design makes me sick.
It's like peanut politician.

Yes...It's good camera for anybody. But it's boring camera. Like D800.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2012 at 12:27 UTC as 27th comment | 6 replies
On Preview:olympusEM5 (1364 comments in total)

M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-50mm 1:3.5-6.3 - funny...Why so slow at the long end?
f6.3 is already diffraction limit for 16 MP crop 2x sensor.
I don't catch the logic - it's only weather sealed lens for m4/3 - right?
But so slow.

DOF equivalent at 35 mm - 100/F13...:)

Posted on Feb 8, 2012 at 12:13 UTC as 321st comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

ogl: Mirrorless like small DSLR: funny, but silly.
The specs are nothing special.
Do you know m4/3 weather sealed lenses?
The design is like wardrobe or cupboard.

Outstanding

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2012 at 06:58 UTC

it could be retro focal lens. 12 mm

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2012 at 06:55 UTC as 5th comment

http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/attachments/pentax-news-rumors/117059d1328664384-new-lenses-announcement-k-q-mount-20120208_6.jpg

so small

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2012 at 06:24 UTC as 6th comment
In reply to:

ogl: Mirrorless like small DSLR: funny, but silly.
The specs are nothing special.
Do you know m4/3 weather sealed lenses?
The design is like wardrobe or cupboard.

Do you know m4/3 weather sealed lenses?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2012 at 04:40 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: Why this 75/1.8 is so big?

FA 77/1.8 Limited - FF lens 64 mm x 48 mm (diameter x length)

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2012 at 04:39 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: 17/0.95 provides the equivalent DOF really as 35/1.9 (for US$1,500 for manual focus instead of US$200 for AF). Sending its image to a poorer sensor. Absurd.

D800 is USD3000, but it's new camera. FF could cost not above 2000-2500 USD (used or new).
Anyway, 35/2 is good lens in any system. And rather cheap. As for IQ - FF killed crop 2 forever. Noise, resolution and so on.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2012 at 04:36 UTC
In reply to:

Zebooka: Sys Requirements are amazing.
Why do they need Core 2 Duo or i5, 2 GB RAM and 1 GB HDD for sending commands via USB ?
This is ridiculous.
For professional usage they should have done WiFi module, not outdated wired USB.
Shame on you Pentax.

PS: Also such long wait for such easy app... what are they doing when they have all specs of camera protocol? I'm telling this as programmer.

Anton, you are not Pentaxian..Why do you care?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2012 at 04:31 UTC
In reply to:

loock: Where is D-FA 90 f 1.7 for K FF35, star or Ltd. ???

On crop 645D, 90mm is like 71mm on FF35 - what portret lens is that ???

645D could get new sensor in the future, don't you think?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2012 at 04:30 UTC

New thin lens for K-01....Interesting. Which focal length and speed?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2012 at 04:27 UTC as 8th comment

Why this 75/1.8 is so big?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2012 at 04:13 UTC as 15th comment | 8 replies

Mirrorless like small DSLR: funny, but silly.
The specs are nothing special.
Do you know m4/3 weather sealed lenses?
The design is like wardrobe or cupboard.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2012 at 04:12 UTC as 50th comment | 9 replies

17/0.95 provides the equivalent DOF really as 35/1.9 (for US$1,500 for manual focus instead of US$200 for AF). Sending its image to a poorer sensor. Absurd.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2012 at 04:09 UTC as 17th comment | 12 replies
Total: 446, showing: 281 – 300
« First‹ Previous1314151617Next ›Last »