good lenses for rather slow and weak camera. IQ and lenses = it's all what Fuji can offer.
UGLY and looks cheap as all low-end Canon cameras.
The problem is only one. Sony's P&S cameras have the worst IQ between other brands. If Sony produce new and good processor for RX100, it will be good camera.
1/7", 2/3" or 1" sensor - no any serious difference at all...20 MP at such sensor is useless.
IQ of samples are close to P&S cameras. Maybe RAW will be better?
Intresting, but no EVF
Pentax Russia has another specs about speed and buffer of K-30
HI: 6 fps till 176 images(JPEG ***), 21 image (RAW) LO: 3 fps till the card full (JPEG ***)
ogl: FA 77/1.8 LimitedMaximum Diameter 64 mmLength 48 mmWeight 270 g
M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm F1.863.5mm diameter x 69.5mm lengthWeight 304 g
why the lens for 4/3 bigger and heavier than for FF?
A lot of fans of Oly with marketing inside the brain. FA77/1.8 is one of the best portrait lens in the world. It's funny to read about bokeh from man which never used FA77.Your sample is funny...It's not bokeh, it's aberration with image of bubbles.
Hmm...Flange distance? You want to say that m4/3 = mythical compactness. OK. We add 20 mm, and what then? We will get the same dimension, but one lens covers FF, and second covers m4/3.
FA 77/1.8 LimitedMaximum Diameter 64 mmLength 48 mmWeight 270 g
The OMD-EM5 system for fans in USA:OM-D E-M5 Micro Four Thirds Digital Camera with 12-50mm - 1300 USD M. Zuiko Digital ED 12mm f/2.0 - 800 USDM. Zuiko Digital ED 45mm f/1.8 - 400 USD M. Zuiko Digital ED 75mm f/1.8 - 900 USD
Not bad...But not cheap. European set will be more expensive.
150/3.6 equivalent of 135 format for 900 USD. Hmmm.
I don't think that 150 mm is PORTRAITS distance.
K-5 has 25 RAW buffer.
ogl: 24-70/f5.6 - 35 mm equivalent
My post it's pure truth.
12-35/2.8 is equivalent to a 24-70mm F/5.6. A equivalent m43 lens to 135 format 24-70mm F/2.8 is 12-35mm F/1.4.
aperture - of course, but DOF is too big.
24-70/f5.6 - 35 mm equivalent
Not impressed. Looks much softer even than K-01 in RAW.
It's the world of the golden calf.
K-01 is better than NEX-5N in RAW at all ISO.
TrojMacReady: Either Dpreview forgot to turn off default chroma NR in ACR, or Pentax now officially cooks its RAW files at all ISO's and more than ever, rather than the previous smoothing that kicked in above ISO 1600.If the latter, it seems to have fooled atleast a few people already, into thinking it's producing better RAW files.
We don't care. NR in RAW were applied at high ISO by ALL BRANDS from the era of 5-6 MP DSLR already. Sony is even proud of it in marketing brochures of A cameras.