ogl

ogl

Joined on Jan 28, 2010

Comments

Total: 559, showing: 281 – 300
« First‹ Previous1314151617Next ›Last »
On article Just posted: Fujifilm X-E1 Review (525 comments in total)
In reply to:

Shunda77: Fuji are finally really pulling it all together, they've had some pretty big teething problems with their x series in the past few years, but now it is maturing very well indeed.
Fuji are looking like they will finally become a very serious player in the digital era, they have done what Kodak couldn't do.

Fuji is dwarf who want to survive in digital era.
Marginal system, low sales, strange techonlogy.

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2013 at 12:26 UTC
On article Just posted: Fujifilm X-E1 Review (525 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: Relax, guys!
DPREVIEW is not independent reviewer for many years already.
They just help to sell camera of their owners. It's business and nothing else.
Dpreview is sold to Amazon on 2007.

"He who pays the piper calls the tune".

I'm not fanboy and never was. I don't care about DPREVIEW's reviews at all. I tell the truth. DPReview is the faithful dog of AMAZON.
Fujifilm advances X system and X-trans with lavish hand.
If they can't sell this marginal system, they will fail.

I'm sorry that ET2, dengx and MJJSevilla are the victims of marketing and consumer society.

DR's tests of DP are ridiculous, by the way.

K-01 - I don't care about K-01 and DPR's awards. It's the game for silly fans.

I've used Ricoh GXR for a last year.

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2013 at 12:04 UTC
On article Just posted: Fujifilm X-E1 Review (525 comments in total)

Relax, guys!
DPREVIEW is not independent reviewer for many years already.
They just help to sell camera of their owners. It's business and nothing else.
Dpreview is sold to Amazon on 2007.

"He who pays the piper calls the tune".

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2013 at 09:59 UTC as 69th comment | 8 replies
On article Just posted: Fujifilm X-E1 Review (525 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: The IQ from ACR is really junk. Compare with the best cameras in terms of IQ - K-5IIs, NEX-7 in RAW.
Gold award - funny....Rather slow camera with very mediocre IQ.

Sensors are different, but Fuji trick is the same...

Link | Posted on Mar 1, 2013 at 18:09 UTC
On article Just posted: Fujifilm X-E1 Review (525 comments in total)
In reply to:

Nikonworks: Give me a break. Gold for troublsome AF? In 2013?

Good IQ in JPEG only. It's all.

Link | Posted on Mar 1, 2013 at 18:03 UTC
On article Just posted: Fujifilm X-E1 Review (525 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: The IQ from ACR is really junk. Compare with the best cameras in terms of IQ - K-5IIs, NEX-7 in RAW.
Gold award - funny....Rather slow camera with very mediocre IQ.

Wait DXO test. X100, for example, has manufacture ISO1600, real 1000, ISO3200 = real 1012, ISO6400 = 1076....:)
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Cameras/Camera-Sensor-Database/Fujifilm/FinePix-X100

I'm sure that the real ISO of X-E1's 6400 is MUCH lower. :) No doubt.

Link | Posted on Mar 1, 2013 at 07:36 UTC
On article Just posted: Fujifilm X-E1 Review (525 comments in total)

The IQ from ACR is really junk. Compare with the best cameras in terms of IQ - K-5IIs, NEX-7 in RAW.
Gold award - funny....Rather slow camera with very mediocre IQ.

Link | Posted on Mar 1, 2013 at 04:27 UTC as 140th comment | 8 replies
On article Adobe's Fujifilm X-Trans sensor processing tested (138 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: X-Trans sensor is 5-6 year late. New cameras 16-36 MP with Bayer sensors without AA filter have very weak level of moire. It's not a problem at all.
X-Trans is invention of new bicycle without technical support. Deadborn.
Fuji can't make the best software for X-Trans sensor and can't solve the problem of their sensor. We get false colours and other types of artifacts instead of moire of Bayer . Adobe and other software developers try to offer anything, but no any serious results.
I can't see any advantages of this marginal technology.

Sigma offers the best software to develop RAW from their specific Foveon.
Why can't Fuji offer RAW converter?

Is it superior? Is it the best to convert RAW from Fuji?
Is it better than C1Pro, ACR or DXO...?

I don't talk about ANY RAW converter. I talk about X-Trans sensors problems and that there is no high effective RAW converter from Fuji.

Link | Posted on Feb 28, 2013 at 13:48 UTC
On article Adobe's Fujifilm X-Trans sensor processing tested (138 comments in total)

X-Trans sensor is 5-6 year late. New cameras 16-36 MP with Bayer sensors without AA filter have very weak level of moire. It's not a problem at all.
X-Trans is invention of new bicycle without technical support. Deadborn.
Fuji can't make the best software for X-Trans sensor and can't solve the problem of their sensor. We get false colours and other types of artifacts instead of moire of Bayer . Adobe and other software developers try to offer anything, but no any serious results.
I can't see any advantages of this marginal technology.

Sigma offers the best software to develop RAW from their specific Foveon.
Why can't Fuji offer RAW converter?

Link | Posted on Feb 28, 2013 at 12:19 UTC as 15th comment | 4 replies
On article Adobe's Fujifilm X-Trans sensor processing tested (138 comments in total)

I don't see that the problem is solved. I see just the try to solve.
Some problems are tried to be solved and solved a bit, the rest problems are unreal to solve. Corrected colours, lost resolution.
The problem of X-trans sensor is not the software. The main problem is color filter array pattern of Fuji sensor.

Link | Posted on Feb 28, 2013 at 06:52 UTC as 18th comment | 1 reply

Buffer Size (RAW, Lossless 14-bit) - 6
Buffer Size (RAW, Compressed 12-bit) - 9

not big at all

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2013 at 17:50 UTC as 9th comment | 1 reply

Crop 2 mode is for JPEG only? Or in RAW too?

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2013 at 17:49 UTC as 10th comment

Good machine. Simply good!

Link | Posted on Feb 21, 2013 at 15:47 UTC as 30th comment

18 and 20 MP at 1/2.3"....It's new crazy level

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2013 at 18:13 UTC as 5th comment
On article World Press Photo announces 2013 contest winners (298 comments in total)

HAMAS puts the rocket launchers near civilians homes. They also make "human shield" from kids and women. HAMAS hates Israel more that they love their children.
The winining photo is too much post processing. And too politically committed.

Our society is sick if the photos of dead children are at 1st place.

Link | Posted on Feb 16, 2013 at 12:19 UTC as 59th comment | 9 replies
On article World Press Photo announces 2013 contest winners (298 comments in total)

It's the shame...The wining photo is the shame.

Link | Posted on Feb 16, 2013 at 06:55 UTC as 68th comment
On article Olympus announces Stylus XZ-10 enthusiast compact (198 comments in total)
In reply to:

B1ackhat: 479.99 GBP = 756.74 USD ... $756 for a 1/2.3" sensor with 5x zoom? Seriously? We already saw this one-trick-pony with the Nikon P300, which is available for 1/3 the price of the XZ-10.

£349.99 = USD 350 in the rest world

Link | Posted on Jan 30, 2013 at 11:38 UTC
In reply to:

NZ Scott: This is great news for m43. Every time a company joins the m43 universe it helps to solidify the standard and ensure its longevity.

It's disappointing to read so many negative comments about Chinese manufacturing standards. Perhaps you should all throw your iPhones in the trash. After all, they are made in China.

Not only that, but the Chinese already make some of the best m43 lenses - including the M. Zuiko 45/1.8 and 60/2.8 Macro.

They need to open PC and understand that 90% of components are made in China and Taiwan.

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2013 at 06:43 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: Where is 32/64 bit Capture One 6.5 for Win XP SP3?

It's the worst thing I ever heard before...

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2013 at 10:41 UTC

Where is 32/64 bit Capture One 6.5 for Win XP SP3?

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2013 at 15:02 UTC as 5th comment | 3 replies
Total: 559, showing: 281 – 300
« First‹ Previous1314151617Next ›Last »