ogl

ogl

Joined on Jan 28, 2010

Comments

Total: 393, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 First Impressions Review preview (1199 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: I like FZ1000 samples more than RX100MKIII.

Of course, Captain Obvious! :))))

Direct link | Posted on Jun 13, 2014 at 16:47 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 First Impressions Review preview (1199 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: I like FZ1000 samples more than RX100MKIII.

You are funny man...:) D800E - stay with it...:)

Direct link | Posted on Jun 13, 2014 at 06:00 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 First Impressions Review preview (1199 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: I like FZ1000 samples more than RX100MKIII.

Strange remark...The camera has OIS - it's switchable.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 12, 2014 at 20:51 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 First Impressions Review preview (1199 comments in total)

I like FZ1000 samples more than RX100MKIII.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 12, 2014 at 16:31 UTC as 242nd comment | 9 replies
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 First Impressions Review preview (1199 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: 1" sensor is becoming the new trend...Good.

I mean 1" is good for bridge cameras and for top-compacts. Maybe it could be standart for many compact cameras. 1/1.7" could rest in past. Even 2/3" can't reach IQ of 1" sensor at all ISO. Smaller sensors can compete at minimal ISO with 1", but it's all. As for FZ1000 - I like the samples more than RX100MKIII.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 12, 2014 at 16:30 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 First Impressions Review preview (1199 comments in total)

1" sensor is becoming the new trend...Good.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 12, 2014 at 11:05 UTC as 276th comment | 7 replies
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III First Impressions Review preview (2979 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: RX100III's IQ is the level of top compact cameras with 1/1.7" sensor.

RX100III is very expensive.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 9, 2014 at 16:31 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III First Impressions Review preview (2979 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: RX100III's IQ is the level of top compact cameras with 1/1.7" sensor.

LX7 - please
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/uploads/post-25954-0-48937800-1401040705_thumb.jpg

Direct link | Posted on Jun 9, 2014 at 16:30 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III First Impressions Review preview (2979 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: RX100III's IQ is the level of top compact cameras with 1/1.7" sensor.

Of course, see Q7 gallery - you can find something the same.

LX7 is worse, maybe, at high ISO, but only masochist use P&S camera at high ISO. At low ISO in JPEG no any serious difference.

m4/3 is far better than Sony.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 9, 2014 at 15:44 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III First Impressions Review preview (2979 comments in total)

RX100III's IQ is the level of top compact cameras with 1/1.7" sensor.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 9, 2014 at 14:51 UTC as 145th comment | 9 replies
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III First Impressions Review preview (2979 comments in total)

GX1 Mark II looks much better at low ISO

Direct link | Posted on May 31, 2014 at 13:52 UTC as 263rd comment
On Samsung NX Mini real-world samples gallery article (143 comments in total)

It's strange, but samples are really good. :) Good job of 1" sensor in hands of Samsung.

Direct link | Posted on May 5, 2014 at 09:31 UTC as 24th comment | 1 reply

Not interesting photos

Direct link | Posted on May 4, 2014 at 16:34 UTC as 55th comment
On Hands on with the Pentax 645Z article (643 comments in total)
In reply to:

mike kobal: Sorry, but a sensor size of 44x33mm cannot be called medium format by traditional definition.
This is a APMFS-C sized sensor (Advanced Photo Medium Format System type-C)

By the way, m4/3 is very close to APS-C in terms of IQ with very small size of bodies.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 14:18 UTC
On Hands on with the Pentax 645Z article (643 comments in total)
In reply to:

falconeyes: This will become the camera with best image quality ever made up to today!

(in terms of DxOMark, it should score around 105 Overall Score and 50MP, even though the jump from 35mm is small (0.79 crop)).

I hope that Ricoh releases the marketing money needed to make this a bold statement for Pentax being overall leader in IQ. The brand needs a bit of hype to make a come back, esp. in the US.

Falconeyes is scientist, no any sense to argue against him.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 14:16 UTC
On Hands on with the Pentax 645Z article (643 comments in total)
In reply to:

mike kobal: Sorry, but a sensor size of 44x33mm cannot be called medium format by traditional definition.
This is a APMFS-C sized sensor (Advanced Photo Medium Format System type-C)

WRONG. Any sensor bigger than 24*36 mm is medium format.
Learn it. Digital era of medium format offers different standarts of middle format sensors. Forget about film time.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 14:13 UTC
On Hands on with the Pentax 645Z article (643 comments in total)

By the way, it's the FIRST in the world MF camera with video mode.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 13:12 UTC as 142nd comment
On Ricoh announces medium-format Pentax 645Z article (157 comments in total)
In reply to:

iae aa eia: I think it was supposed to be already mirroless, with a nice EVF, and its sensor 56 x 41.5mm, as it was the 645 film frame area. 33 x 44mm looks like what the APS format is to the 135 full-frame, a cropped sensor to cut their investment some slack. Not a true medium-medium. Just medium.

44*33 is one of standart of MF sensor sizes.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 04:46 UTC
On Ricoh announces medium-format Pentax 645Z article (157 comments in total)
In reply to:

iae aa eia: I think it was supposed to be already mirroless, with a nice EVF, and its sensor 56 x 41.5mm, as it was the 645 film frame area. 33 x 44mm looks like what the APS format is to the 135 full-frame, a cropped sensor to cut their investment some slack. Not a true medium-medium. Just medium.

I had made photos with 6*6 film for several years. :) Rolleiflex 2.8F.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 04:45 UTC
On Ricoh announces medium-format Pentax 645Z article (157 comments in total)
In reply to:

iae aa eia: I think it was supposed to be already mirroless, with a nice EVF, and its sensor 56 x 41.5mm, as it was the 645 film frame area. 33 x 44mm looks like what the APS format is to the 135 full-frame, a cropped sensor to cut their investment some slack. Not a true medium-medium. Just medium.

Dear friend, 56*41.5 mm is a film size. Digital era has new digital medium format sensor sizes. 44*33 mm is the standart for digital MF cameras. The crop-factor is used just for calculating focal ranges.
The result from old 11 MP FF camera was not worse than the scanned 56*41.5 mm scanned film. What are you talking about? 51 MP 44*33 mm CMOS sensor is way ahead of scanned film.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 03:39 UTC
Total: 393, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »