Pentax K-3II is a bit sharper in RAW
ogl: Like nothing
I like the beauty, not everyday's hell.
ogl: The lens is the main part of the camera. If there is no sharpness at all, how to use such camera?
Funny... how do you explain the difference between software ISO and measured ISO? For example, indicated ISO1600, 3200, 6400 of X100 are the same ISO1000 as DXO had measured. All other cameras have same trick only in expanded mode. Expanded mode is software ISO too.
Do you insist on that there is no real ISO in camera? The ASA and DIN film speed standards have been combined into the ISO standards since 1974.The current International Standard for measuring the speed of color negative film is ISO 5800:2001 (first published in 1979, revised in November 1987) from the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Related standards ISO 6:1993 (first published in 1974) and ISO 2240:2003 (first published in July 1982, revised in September 1994, and corrected in October 2003) define scales for speeds of black-and-white negative film and color reversal film, respectively.
The determination of ISO speeds with digital still-cameras is described in ISO 12232:2006 (first published in August 1998, revised in April 2006, and corrected in October 2006). DXO measures ISO speed under such standarts. The ISO system defines both an arithmetic and a logarithmic scale. The arithmetic ISO scale corresponds to the arithmetic ASA system, where a doubling of film sensitivity is represented by a doubling of the numerical film speed value. For example, a film rated ISO 200/24° is twice as sensitive as one rated ISO 100/21°. If DXO measure ISO1000 - it means it's ISO1000 under ASA method of scale.
Measured ISO = real ISO.
ozturert: Look at "Cons". They have been more or less the same since XPro1:Critical detail at 100% suffersWaxy-looking skin in high ISO imagesAF tends to huntX-Trans sensor design limits Raw-converter choiceAnd lens... X100s and X100T's lenses were good but not very good in my opinion. Strange though, as Fuji's X-series prime lenses are usually very good (except from 18mm f2.0) but X100s and this X70 are not as good as rivals.
maybe they can't do good compact lenses for compact bodies.
I can repeat one more - Good photo with good sharpness will be better. Good photo with bad sharpness won't be better. Bad photo will be bad with any lens.
Fujifilm X100 - ISO1600 is real ISO1000, ISO3200 is real ISO1012, ISO6400 is real ISO1076.
Don't compare apples with oranges. You try to avoid discussion to another side. Good photo with good sharpness will be better. Good photo with bad sharpness won't be better. As for high ISO - Fujifilm X100 had ISO trick - indicated ISO and real ISO had a big difference. It's hard to say anything about X70 without DXO tests. Anyway, photography needs light. No light - no photo. You can make good noise reduction in RAW converter with GR or Nikon A, but you can't change lens of X70 :)
as for me, it's sharpness of mediocre zoom lens, not fixed one.
The lens is the main part of the camera. If there is no sharpness at all, how to use such camera?
ogl: P&S camera's IQ.
Lower than 1 stop in terms of noise. But I say about IQ.
Sony's ISO400 is real ISO301, screen SNR18% -28.7 dB, ISO400 of MX-1 is real ISO356, SNR18% - 25.9 dB. Sony has the same SNR18% at ISO800 (real ISO597). It means the difference of SN is the diffrence between real ISO597 and ISO356. It's lower than 1 stop.
I hope that 1" sensor is better than 1/1.7"...But it's very close. Maybe JPEG from RAW could be better?
P&S camera's IQ.
As for me 12800 is the limit
A6000 has sharper pictures
ogl: Who are the buyers of this system...?
Nothing is wrong, it should be the necessity to buy
My friends with money use smart-phones to take pictures :)))