epozar

Not really I think.
I had have 35-70/2.8 on D600 and sold it. Simply not up to the 20+ MPix sensor. And CA is excessive.

"Monday, 01 April, 2013 17:19" :)))))

With all that dust/oil issues with D600 I wonder whether the cleaning is working at all :((

Well yes.. so it's Canon that makes all that noise :)

I have both Canon 6D and Nikon D600 cameras.While 6D (and other Canons) producea a distinctive sound while a sensor cleaning is engaged I cannot hear any while do the same in D600. What's "the...

no evf :((

Sigma original 12-24 is very good distorsion-wise, none at 24mm and very low down to approx 17mm if I remember correctly. Even at 12mm it is only low-ish barrel.

Not really. Maybe people in Magic Lantern will find some solution..

That one I tried was not.. sharp till 300mm, nothing more.

Yep! And still better than Sigmas "up to 400/500" zooms

But so far, which lens is problematic in this regard? --Emil Pozar, http://emil-pozar.photoshelter.com

Hm, I have both and while 100-400 is very nice lens it CANNOT compare with 70-200 in equal terms. Simply the shorter zoom is superior in every way.

Never heard of Canon auto-CA, at least not with PS?

You already know it - "increases" ISO, something we also do in PS ACR when compensate for corner image fall-off.

100-400 at 400mm is better than 2.8/70-200 II IS plus 2.0 TC.

Agree :)

You were never *that* close? :DBTW, beautiful Hurricane, fantastic original look...

tnx :)

Just curious how to check for de-centering, is it obvious enough?

I am using a silent shutter 90% of the time with 6D. Because of much less vibration, of course.