naththo: Not as good as old EM1 imo. I have seen nice example of EM1 better than this new one with ridiculous colour tone of green skies rather than blue skies, something so wrong with either RAW or JPEG engine. Or even sensor Demosaicing is up to no good.
you right!e-m1 best camera in whole caveland!e-m5 II bad and dangerous!smash e-m5 II and those cavemen that like e-m5, they bad and dangerous too...
robogobo: What a completely useless exercise.
no, to use a FF canon with a 24 - 70 L attached might be useless exercise for many people
spontaneousservices: If it's really for "manual everything" photographers, where's the dedicated ISO wheel? Still the old film mindset, amazing, really. So many years after film disappeared from the camera body, changing ISO is still more involved than changing shutter speed or aperture. But what would really make me buy such a camera (more than flip screen or ISO wheel) is a fixed 50mm equivalent lens. Sigh. Maybe one day...
i don't get it why 35mm FOV is boring...when exactly in this discussion did we lose the importance of the photographer on the photo?
caravan: Well done Fuji ! again they are leading from the front,proving how worthless and unnecessary zooms are on compact cameras.
also, fuji kind of lives of their compact cameras that have (super)zoom. look at their S-lineup. many people buy that
Mr N: Hello everyone, I've always wanted to buy the Fujifilm X100 series camera ever since they had come out. I was in college back then and it was out of my price range, and so I kept putting it off forever. I am an architect but mostly I take street photography and some architecture details (barely to be honest), could any of you guys give me a thumbs up if you think I should just go for it instead of any other camera for my use ? I know I won't be able to take wide angle shots but that's okay, I never photograph an entire building only parts of it. Thanks in advance, also the colour in the beta sample gallery seems weird, I hope I can change this, any X100 series users out there., some input would be great.
while it is true what you say about worse iso performance, you won't believe that people really can live with it!
J2Gphoto: This Fuji got my attention and I was giving it serious thought. Like I posted before I like the Olympus lens line up better. But now after reading Steve Huff's review of it and seeing the SOOC JPEG's and several other things he said the E-M1 does much better I am now convinced the E-M1 will be my next system. I'd advise anyone considering this camera to read Steve's review. He never pulls punches and gives honest real world use reviews.
we want to have good and reliable reviews about products, some of that cost thousands of dollars... (thank you DPReview Team BTW!!!)
but of course we want to have it FOR FREE!hello?
for me it's ok that steve and ken use their websites as part of their income. we don't HAVE TO VISITbut i do! because i like to get information about stuff i find interesting. the more the better.
and personally i love steve huffs reviews. they are fun most of the time and he is sort of grounded when he asks you in the reviews: "Do you think you need this?" and he might have some f0.95 lenses for his m43 cameras, but he repeats it all the time: olympus 2/12, 1.8/17 and 1.8/45 besides the voigtlanders... and he convinced me about smaller-than-FF cameras. For example i do have a nikon V1, a "toy" camera but for me it (almost) does everything i need.
KakoW: In need of a new camera, I went to the store today to try it out.
I was blown away : it offers full manual control in a small package and a very impressive IS. With the 17 f1.8 it handles well.
My GF didn't like it. The grip is short and shallow. She voted for the X-T1. She felt the E-M10 requires an aperture ring, since your left hand rests under the lens.
Try it before you buy it, is what I'm trying to say.
what's wrong with his old one?
kadardr: Why do I like the Nikon 1 system? It has a unique mix of characteristics.1. Unobtrusive design, pretends to be a small P&S. No attention drawer.2. Totally noiseless operation with the electronic shutter. Stealth shooting, great candids.3. Blazing fast AF, which is also very accurate, if you choose the right method depending on the situation. (actually the small sensor does not require the accuracy of an FX system) 4.Bewilderingly fast burst mode.5. Great lenses. My favorites are the 18.5mm, 30-110mm and the 6.7- 13mm.6. Great video. I use it for GIF making only.7. Great raw quality. Great colors, sharpness and all. Very intuitive UI (even the V1).
Nikon 1s are the all time companion camera to me. I will get the V3 for sure.
i'm with you. silent operation is what mirrorless should really be for me. so i will stick to my unobtrusive and fast V1. i was tempted with the V3, but for that price: combined with 6.7-13 and 32mm lenses, i would still pay 1900 euro...
so i will keep my V1 with 10mm and 18.5mm in my backpack for light stuff and get a GH4, which is more expensive of course, but does handle the stuff i do much better and works silent too. Plus m43 for me feels a little bit like open source. no more nikon 1 stuff for me, sorry...
CameraLabTester: I like Nikon cameras and their innovative gear.
I like the Nikon brand.
But there is something REALLY WRONG with this camera system.
Nikon is not listening.
It is trying to feed "good enough" fodder to the innocent masses with mumbo jumbo technical word spins to regurgitate redundant features.
The whole system is an ergonomic design nightmare.
no, nikon does not listen because it is their policy. really, i work with nikon microscopes and even their technicians are amazed of nikons i-don't-take-input-from-you strategy, and that goes from top to bottom...
flatrion: Where is the 'T' comes from ? It does not resemble Contax T, it is not made of titanium.
i like raw images, i really do. sometimes, they can allow for jaw-dropping adjustments.but most often they don't.i get it, you are professional, but you won't see a paradigm-shift increase in quality with DNGs from any camera.
fdfgdfgdgf: Flat IQ and colorsNikon D3300/5300 outperform it by a leap.
They need to move to APSC, then it will challenge DSLR's
so i assume you have a nikon DSLR and feel threatened?
Sad Joe: PLUS: Nice new cheaper OM model. CONS: Perhaps they should speak with their pals at Panasonic about video before bringing out anymore...
right. your opinion. everyone's got one...
i disagree. the E-M10 does not "need" an aperture ring. though it is nice to have one with the fuji lenses, people might see it as a must have, which is odd. for example: with the 25/1.8 prime, your left hand is not needed to stabilize a E-M10, because it is that light! and my right hand can do all the adjusting
Jogger: Nice camera, but, sensor is still too small.
beavertown: Guess how much for EVF?
WTF has this number to to with an EVF for a line, i paid initially $300 for V1+kit lens ?!?
happypoppeye: Well, usually most of the comments here are "anti-brand" type but this time I have to agree with most of them. The camera looks great and I would definitely be interested. Looks like the nicest of the 1 series yet ...but $1199? That is almost just about insane. I need neither the EVF nor the grip, yet I have to buy it to get the camera ...dumb. Nikon is making people buy a camera that most people will buy for the size yet those people have to also buy the grip that will never be used by most? C'mon.
Things like this and like the Canon EOS-M AF make me think that maybe it is time for Nikon to Canon to start losing massive amounts of money on their photo divisions. Ashame ...great looking and spec'd camera.
ahm, no you don`t! you can buy it with the lens only and in some countries, even body only options are available. doesn't make the high price point appealing though!
funniest thing here is that you can see the obsession with more expensive PRO/more megapixel models: a7 vs a7Ri hear myself saying: go on hipsters, get your maximum pixel FF
Wingszero: It is rather a dilemma for me to order a X-e2 because of its price compared to X-pro1. $999 is even higher than its bigger brother now, though it is lighter, smaller(and maybe a little faster?). I'd rather wait for the next generation of X-pro1...
Wingzero, do you have the X-Pro1?
if not:do you need the OVF?or the lower resolution EVF?or the older X-Trans I sensor? or the slower EXR I processor? or the lack of lens modulation? or the lack of flash?or the lack of phase detection AF?
ah, no! the X-Pro1 is the current flagship, right? X-Pro1 IMO does not touch the X-E2.
eopix: How many of these changes will trickle down to existing X-E1's via firmware updates I wonder?
so true. but that's the catch: if you want some, come buy some!
tjbates: Everywhere else - this camera is a slam dunk. Strange that DPR thinks differently. The GH3 almost suffered the same fate. It was only for it's "video capabilities" that GH3 reluctantly gained the Gold award.Looks like anything in this bracket is and will be compared to the OMD-EM5 from now on and for evermore. Fair enough, but the viewfinder eye cup will not fall off the GX7, the flash doesn't require two pieces of plastic to be removed and a separate flash installed, the menu layout on the GX7 doesn't require a diploma in frustration and the button layout and grip allows for one handed "eye-to-viewfinder" use- unlike the OMD-EM5.I say this as a GH2 user and someone thinking of getting an OMD-EM5 if only for the fact that I've now got a fantastic collection of Olympus prime lenses. That said - the GX7 looks so much better on paper. It even shoots 25p video! I know the GX7 viewfinder is suspect but it's still so much better than the GH3 and OMD-EM5. IMHO.
i think, awards or that score are nothing compared to owning that camera and USING IT FOR PHOTOGRAPHY or videography or a paperweight, WHATEVER SUITS YOU...my nikon V1 got 69% and i loved shooting with it. i see the reasons for a scoring system but don't give too much on it.