Babaksabri: I would like to see the new X100 comes with a 24-105mm f1.8 zoom lens(35mm lens format equivalent).
Some people love to see the world burn.
dmaclau: mechanical focus is enough. weatherproofing is nice as is an articulating screen but my X-100 is perfectly fine without either of those...don't get "lens big."
+1Mechanical focus would be awesome
stevez: A collapsible 24-70 f3.5 would be nice. f3.5 to keep it compact.
The Maze400: I think this camera is perfect, if they want to improve the lens than 23mm f 1.2 would do the trick.
spa100: Strange. Fuji just came out with the X100T 8 months ago and now they release a new one? It must be a complement to the X100 line, not a relacement. 50mm eq lens? Zoom? I love my X100T. It's fine as it is. It's not perfection, but close.
Wait for this new sensor!
MarkMonckton: 10-23mm f1.8Quad Linear motor for high-speed autofocus 3 ED (extra low-dispersion) elements Lens Modulation Optimiser (LMO) technologyEXR III Processor for faster AF and face detection
You lost me with the zoom...
maciek sz: I would love to see 50mm equiv on such Fuji body. Right now only focal lenght is stopping me from buying X100T.
Converter. Brings you 50mm equivalents @ f/2
axian: The FoV on this camera is miserable. I would gladly trade off just a tiny bit more extrusion on the lens to get to 24mm full-frame equivalent. Took the x100s on a vacation and spent 98% of the time shooting with the iPhone instead.
Great looking camera, lots of compliments, etc. But as far as versatility goes it's not that great. Maybe I'm asking for too much. For the price, I'd definitely go with Leica D'Lux fixed lens shooter next time.
You have to be kidding me...
Karateka: Hi, im still not sure if buying the a6000 or panasonic gx7. I need it for vacation, children, it should be good in low-light and at least fit in a jacket.
I actually prefer the a6000 so far cause better grip, larger sensor and the gx7 is supposed to use too low shutter speed at Aperture mode.However, i realised on ,,new comparison tool'' that the red/blue colour-stripes from the puppets at iso 3200/low-light still have full contrast with gx7, the sony is like mud....Also the autofocus is said to be better on the gx7. There is also a touchscreen (really big advantage?) and it has an electronic noiseless shutter.
In terms of lenses the mft may be a bit smaller but i dont think its a big deal, price is almost the same i think. I wont buy huge bunch of lenses anyway, probably the sel 20 2.8 and the sel 35 1.8 for the sony.
Can anybody give me a hint or has anybod used both cameras?
I really would appreciate that, thanks.
same situation here. the a6000 is really a steal for €500. the lenses though... other than 1.8/35 and 1.8/24 (price: ouch!) i did not find a lens i fell in love. the 2.8/20 you mentioned seems like a better option (or 2.8/19 Sigma).
pro-GX7 for me would be in camera stabilizer and the silent shutter. plus if i would buy into m43s, i would not sell lenses anytime soon.
tecnoworld: This morning I had the opportunity to test this camera for about one hour (formerly I tried it in shop only). The af is impressive to say the least, compared to my Samsung nx300 (even with its fastest lenses on, like myn16-50 f2-2.8). I was able to lock focus on a passing biker and on a flying bird, with great precision. Also the buffer is great (the one of nx300 is ridiculous).
The evf is not as good as the one in x-e2, but does not show rainbows as the one in nx30 does.
I don't like the lack of a touch screen. I use it for focus point setting only, but that is handy. The rear display is about at the same level (quite low) of my nx300. Not visible in sunlight. But a6000 has evf, so it's fine.
I love the form factor, feels great in hands and during use.
I'm still perplexed about lens offering by Sony. Some good but expensive ones, many not so good ones.
watched the Fong review. This was the worst review i watched a long time ago. I don't even want to investigate if he is a good photographer. even advertisements can be better than this.
Cagey75: Seriously, not having a touch screen is a con these days?? Is this for photography or posting to facebook ffs!
touch screen -> quick focus selection. major pro in my opinion. like a dedicated button.
and it is not for facebook, ffs Cagey75
dervalrobert: Is there a way that the camera shoot whit a delay so that I can be in the picture??
@dervalrobert you have to be kidding...did you ever use a camera before?
LukeDuciel: All my curiosity in to the camera went away when I clicked on the sample photos...
even the "hi-res" 40MP photos seem to have less real detail vs. my X100s.
course! it has to be because ASPC simply is better than m43. forever!sensor size, you know? physics'n'sh*t, for real... everybody knows.
TorHA: The electronic viewfinder cannot be used with polarized sunglasses? It blackens out, presumably? That's a terrible disappointment. For me that's a complete showstopper. I must use sunglasses outdoors, unless it's quite cloudy. I can't take them off. That's not a problem for the one camera I own with an EVF (the DSLR of course is no problem).
I had high hopes for this camera. If its viewfinder is polarized then that goes out the window.
WTF did i just read?
Mike FL: "This image was shot tripod-mounted using high-res mode".
- tripod-mounted. Of course- In the cave = zero air movement to De-stabilizing the tripod/camera- Object stone = you know what it means
Do you missing something?
yes, he might have edited the sense away?
naththo: Not as good as old EM1 imo. I have seen nice example of EM1 better than this new one with ridiculous colour tone of green skies rather than blue skies, something so wrong with either RAW or JPEG engine. Or even sensor Demosaicing is up to no good.
you right!e-m1 best camera in whole caveland!e-m5 II bad and dangerous!smash e-m5 II and those cavemen that like e-m5, they bad and dangerous too...
robogobo: What a completely useless exercise.
no, to use a FF canon with a 24 - 70 L attached might be useless exercise for many people
spontaneousservices: If it's really for "manual everything" photographers, where's the dedicated ISO wheel? Still the old film mindset, amazing, really. So many years after film disappeared from the camera body, changing ISO is still more involved than changing shutter speed or aperture. But what would really make me buy such a camera (more than flip screen or ISO wheel) is a fixed 50mm equivalent lens. Sigh. Maybe one day...
i don't get it why 35mm FOV is boring...when exactly in this discussion did we lose the importance of the photographer on the photo?
caravan: Well done Fuji ! again they are leading from the front,proving how worthless and unnecessary zooms are on compact cameras.
also, fuji kind of lives of their compact cameras that have (super)zoom. look at their S-lineup. many people buy that
Mr N: Hello everyone, I've always wanted to buy the Fujifilm X100 series camera ever since they had come out. I was in college back then and it was out of my price range, and so I kept putting it off forever. I am an architect but mostly I take street photography and some architecture details (barely to be honest), could any of you guys give me a thumbs up if you think I should just go for it instead of any other camera for my use ? I know I won't be able to take wide angle shots but that's okay, I never photograph an entire building only parts of it. Thanks in advance, also the colour in the beta sample gallery seems weird, I hope I can change this, any X100 series users out there., some input would be great.
while it is true what you say about worse iso performance, you won't believe that people really can live with it!