Jan Kritzinger

Jan Kritzinger

Joined on Jun 6, 2012

Comments

Total: 89, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Just Posted: Our Nikon Coolpix A review article (352 comments in total)

This is roughly what I thought the Sony RX10 would be.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 6, 2013 at 17:55 UTC as 79th comment
On Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM Preview preview (349 comments in total)
In reply to:

snow14: i don't thing sigma will get AF issue solved on this one.

What AF issue?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 22, 2013 at 16:36 UTC
In reply to:

TWIZEEL: could be better if 12 - 24 or 35 - 70

Nope, this is the sweet spot.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 22, 2013 at 16:35 UTC
In reply to:

makofoto: Why are the shots so grainy?

Noob forgot to turn NR on in camera

Direct link | Posted on Feb 9, 2013 at 05:37 UTC
In reply to:

Phoque: If only they could put out as many good lenses as they are unveiling new generations of camera...

This criticism is holding less and less water, yet people keep regurgitating it at every opportunity.

As soon as I can afford it, Im getting the stabilised 35mm and 50mm primes, and when it comes out, the 20mm pancake.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 2, 2013 at 11:05 UTC
In reply to:

zapatista: Dang, I wish Sigma would come out with two similarly bright excellent lenses for about half the price.

I wish Sigma would make pancakes.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 24, 2013 at 17:30 UTC
In reply to:

viking79: $350 for an f/2.8 pancake with no OSS? Sony sure knows how to market lenses. Canon 22mm f/2 is a full stop larger aperture and $100 less :) I imagine the Sony will sell better though.

It looks good though, would look nice on a NEX 6.

Wait, you want it to be a pancake AND have OSS?

Why stop there? It should also be F/1.2 and make cappucinos.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 23, 2013 at 05:02 UTC

20mm pancake = Instabuy.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 23, 2013 at 05:00 UTC as 63rd comment
In reply to:

slncezgsi: ... so the m4/3 is going viral ;)

@manuelvilardmacedo, you fail at sarcasm :)

Direct link | Posted on Jan 22, 2013 at 05:04 UTC
On Just Posted: Canon PowerShot N first impressions article (30 comments in total)

Nex + Eye-fi is infinitely better than this.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2013 at 19:02 UTC as 11th comment | 1 reply
On Just Posted: Canon PowerShot N first impressions article (30 comments in total)

I wish manufacturers wouldn't use clueless market researchers to determine camera specifications.

This camera, and many others (samsung galaxy camera) would have been much better if they had smaller zoom ranges and larger sensors. But because optical zoom is a key spec that the average consumer looks for, we have to be content with suboptimal products.

I wish sensor surface area was a spec listed on every camera, and every cellphone camera ever sold.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2013 at 19:01 UTC as 12th comment | 3 replies
On Best Camera of 2012: And the Winner is... article (1412 comments in total)

Okay, so the EM-5 won... but the Nex 6 wasn't even an /option/ in the poll?

Nuts.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 1, 2013 at 20:19 UTC as 299th comment | 4 replies
On Dpreview Users' Poll: Best Camera of 2012? article (1511 comments in total)
In reply to:

Nappe1: OM-D EM-5 Definetely. making weather proof, Image Stabilized, such high quality digital camera in such small size is a big achievment.

Not really, if you consider how small the sensor is. Great camera, but hardly innovative/groundbreaking or a "big achievement".

Direct link | Posted on Dec 21, 2012 at 04:43 UTC
On Dpreview Users' Poll: Best Camera of 2012? article (1511 comments in total)
In reply to:

Vlad4D: Let's add missed cameras and restart the pool !!!
Missing cameras are: Sony NEX-6, Fuji X-E1, Pentax K-5 II and few more.
Press "Like" on this message if you agree !!!

I mean, seriously, how can you have the OM-D EM-5 on the list, but not a single Nex?

That would be the same as having the 5D III on the list but not the D800.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 21, 2012 at 04:42 UTC
On Dpreview Users' Poll: Best Camera of 2012? article (1511 comments in total)
In reply to:

deep7: I want to vote for the Fuji XE1 but it's not on the list. Polite request....

No Nex 6 Either!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 20, 2012 at 03:44 UTC
In reply to:

Jan Kritzinger: Why do this article /before/ the launch of W8?

After the launch of W8 nothing will beat an x86 slate for photo editing. It's less than two weeks away.

Not to mention that you could've included a Samsung series 7 slate running the release preview of W8.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2012 at 13:52 UTC

Why do this article /before/ the launch of W8?

After the launch of W8 nothing will beat an x86 slate for photo editing. It's less than two weeks away.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2012 at 13:51 UTC as 32nd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

attomole: Why would they need to do this?

because someone made the mistake of putting a marketer in charge.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2012 at 16:44 UTC

Hasselblad destroyed by marketers. #tragic.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2012 at 16:41 UTC as 95th comment

The sad part is that they could have done this really really well, but some designer stuffed it up, and the beancounters in charge didn't have enough brains to realize it.

If HB gets proper designers, and gives this HB styling from 40 years ago (in stead of one year ago) it could be amazing.

Right now it's garbage - indicative of a massive failure on the part of management and design.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2012 at 04:00 UTC as 174th comment
Total: 89, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »