josseee

josseee

Joined on Aug 2, 2012

Comments

Total: 56, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
On article Hands-on with the Sony RX10 III (308 comments in total)
In reply to:

vesa1tahti: No tilting screen, no tilting EVF => no place in the market.

no tilting EVF means no place on market?? Means the market consist of like 2 cameras in total?

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 08:30 UTC

hello and good bye...
...useless madness :)

Link | Posted on Mar 28, 2016 at 16:54 UTC as 85th comment
In reply to:

nicolaiecostel: 3.6 fps, ISO 100-6400 and 9 focus points. 2004 called he wants his camera back !

2004 will be very disappointed seeing the horrible foveon noise at ISO >800 :)

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2016 at 00:03 UTC
On article Ultra-compact: Sony Cyber-shot RX1R II review (539 comments in total)
In reply to:

AksCT: Any info/guesstimate as how many RX1RI sony sold?

enough to decide to go for version II ;)

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2016 at 18:32 UTC
In reply to:

zlatko: The 24-70/2.8 is heavier than Canon's excellent 24-70/2.8 version II. And the 85/1.4 is heavier than Sigma's or Nikon's 85/1.4.

Zlatko, why did you leave nikon 24-70/2.8 II out of the comparison? :)

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 22:06 UTC

bokeh looks quite meh...

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 03:48 UTC as 35th comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

Frank C.: 35mm...
too wide for portraits
too narrow for landscapes
the no man's land of focal lengths
what is there to like??

what?
this must be the stupidest comment Ive seen in ages :D
35 is a no mans land, all right..all the reportage and street photographers must be out of their minds while using it. And also the producers, having 4-5 types of 35mm in their line-up. Didnt they hear Frank C. ??

Link | Posted on Dec 28, 2015 at 18:55 UTC
On article In Fine Detail: Canon EOS 5DS / 5DS R In-Depth Review (729 comments in total)

the colours are truly amazing. One thing I as a sony shooter envy a lot. Sony should team up with canon to provide the ultimate sensor :)

Link | Posted on Dec 18, 2015 at 01:07 UTC as 156th comment | 17 replies
On article Got Game? Canon EF 35mm F1.4L II USM gallery updated (57 comments in total)
In reply to:

TheEmrys: Still has the crummy pink hue to skin tones in RAW.

as said by others,pink is better than green (Im a sony shooter, but not a blinded one)

Link | Posted on Dec 3, 2015 at 05:56 UTC
On article Sony brings uncompressed Raw to a7S II, a7R II and... (562 comments in total)
In reply to:

leonche64: Wonderful! Does this mean that all the non-Sony users that were so vocal about this will now go out and buy the cameras?

no, it means that they will find something else to complain about ;)

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2015 at 16:45 UTC
On article Under the hood: A closer look at the Sony a7R II (600 comments in total)

how about the low-light AF? I have seen complains about it

Link | Posted on Aug 17, 2015 at 15:31 UTC as 121st comment | 1 reply
On article The travel photography of HDR guru Trey Ratcliff (235 comments in total)

I like his burning man pictures..the landscapes not that much

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2015 at 12:27 UTC as 104th comment
On article Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV Review (1601 comments in total)

funny how much ranting about the lossy compression...
Well, the folks complaining about it should just grab the G7x and enjoy the mud it produces while shooting wide :)

Link | Posted on Jul 29, 2015 at 15:19 UTC as 135th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

josseee: hm...first thing I zoomed in was the cableway cabin...not impressed...

well, if canon gives me a nice pile of money + full team for 2 weeks expedition, I will definitely do so :D

Link | Posted on Jun 2, 2015 at 21:44 UTC

hm...first thing I zoomed in was the cableway cabin...not impressed...

Link | Posted on Jun 2, 2015 at 21:01 UTC as 71st comment | 8 replies
In reply to:

josseee: "significant improvements in image quality" does this mean the optical formula was changed? I doubt that, since the elements info looks the same as previous version, the length and weight also looks more or less the same (VII seems to be 2 grams lighter) Anyway, since my old 24-70 is already deadly sharp as it is and my only concern about "not so great" bokeh in some situations seems to be unresolved, I will skip this one...
Still good to see that sony is giving something to the A mount crowd

ther might be an improvement, but my guess is that its noticable in the flaring/ghosting department, not in the way the bokeh is rendered

Link | Posted on Apr 23, 2015 at 16:54 UTC

"significant improvements in image quality" does this mean the optical formula was changed? I doubt that, since the elements info looks the same as previous version, the length and weight also looks more or less the same (VII seems to be 2 grams lighter) Anyway, since my old 24-70 is already deadly sharp as it is and my only concern about "not so great" bokeh in some situations seems to be unresolved, I will skip this one...
Still good to see that sony is giving something to the A mount crowd

Link | Posted on Apr 23, 2015 at 16:32 UTC as 15th comment | 9 replies
In reply to:

Dirk Nuary: Always pricey, why?

@halfwaythere those lens are not sony made...

Link | Posted on Apr 23, 2015 at 08:39 UTC
On article Sony SLT-A77 II Review (535 comments in total)

seems like A mount users are waaay more mature than E mounters.

Link | Posted on Apr 23, 2015 at 06:06 UTC as 97th comment
On article Sony Alpha a7 II Review (848 comments in total)
In reply to:

josseee: pity that those ones that don't care about the IBIS have to stand the extra weight caused by it...
Anyway, for me personally the only thing that the original A7 was missing, is the A6000 style AF

ijustloveshooting...you stated it as some kind of an "absolute truth". Stating "A7ii is a huge leap over A7...PERIOD" is very absolutistic my friend. Not everybody agrees to your statements, actually many seems to disagree

Link | Posted on Apr 8, 2015 at 09:12 UTC
Total: 56, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »