Mssimo

Mssimo

Lives in United States Minneapolis, MN, United States
Works as a Software Analyst
Has a website at www.10000photography.com
Joined on Jun 6, 2009

Comments

Total: 627, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
On Leica teases 'Mini M' for 11th June release news story (304 comments in total)
In reply to:

ArchSaturn: Why do I cynically expect this to turn out to be a Panasonic GX1 with a red dot on it and an inflated price tag. (or maybe the new GX2)

Maybe the leica will be the first to use the new Color Splitter sensor.

Direct link | Posted on May 23, 2013 at 21:55 UTC
On Leica teases 'Mini M' for 11th June release news story (304 comments in total)

If it is a u4/3 camera...i hope they make some nice manual focus lenses for it.

Direct link | Posted on May 23, 2013 at 18:38 UTC as 94th comment | 3 replies
On Adobe publicly confirms stand-alone future for Lightroom news story (615 comments in total)

would be nice if they added Pano stitching and HDR support (HDR merge)

Direct link | Posted on May 15, 2013 at 19:06 UTC as 182nd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Mssimo: "depth of field control of an 86mm F3.2 lens for a full-frame system" Why not just say this is a 32mm f1.2. It has the same DOF on a FF or a Crop system. Bokeh and light intensity of a f1.2 is also the same.

So you if like the Bokeh or DOF you get with a 32mm f1.2 lens...it will act the same way on a crop than a FF.
Only thing that changes is the crop/FOV.

A 32mm f1.2 lens will have the same DOF or Bokeh on any sensor size. Only thing that changes is the FOV or Crop. If you like DOF of a 32mm or 35mm on a FF..it will be the same on a CX. So you can crop your FF to 2.7 or use it on a CX camera but the results are the same.

Direct link | Posted on May 14, 2013 at 21:56 UTC

"depth of field control of an 86mm F3.2 lens for a full-frame system" Why not just say this is a 32mm f1.2. It has the same DOF on a FF or a Crop system. Bokeh and light intensity of a f1.2 is also the same.

So you if like the Bokeh or DOF you get with a 32mm f1.2 lens...it will act the same way on a crop than a FF.
Only thing that changes is the crop/FOV.

Direct link | Posted on May 14, 2013 at 13:05 UTC as 83rd comment | 10 replies
On Just Posted: Detailed hands-on Olympus PEN E-P5 preview news story (315 comments in total)
In reply to:

sadwitch: Here's a good size comparison between vf-2 vs vf-4
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/img/dcw/docs/598/910/42.jpg

I wonder if this VF will work on the Leica M (type 240)

Direct link | Posted on May 12, 2013 at 19:10 UTC

He could have cleaned the phones before taking the pictures ;)

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2013 at 23:01 UTC as 40th comment
On Adobe Photoshop CC: What it means for photographers news story (1879 comments in total)

Gone are the days of discounts also. How can you lower the cost per month without the current members requesting the same.

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2013 at 01:30 UTC as 778th comment
On Adobe Photoshop CC: What it means for photographers news story (1879 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mssimo: Did he really say that he expected negative reactions from photographers but did not care? That is how I understood his response.

"We expected a higher degree of this type of reaction from the hobbyist photographic community because currently there's not a lot of photography-specific value in our subscription products."
But I guess they will still take our money even if we don't get much "Value" out of it.

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2013 at 00:39 UTC
On Adobe Photoshop CC: What it means for photographers news story (1879 comments in total)

Did he really say that he expected negative reactions from photographers but did not care? That is how I understood his response.

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2013 at 00:36 UTC as 807th comment | 5 replies
On Adobe Photoshop CC: What it means for photographers news story (1879 comments in total)

Classic Question Dodge:

How do you justify the price increase to photographers?

Last year we actually cut the price of Lightroom in half in order to open it up to a broader market of photographers.

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2013 at 00:18 UTC as 817th comment | 3 replies

Never seen more comments on a single post.

Direct link | Posted on May 7, 2013 at 19:03 UTC as 158th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Mssimo: Adobe should follow the most successful software model of the last 15 years. The "App Store"(apple, android, amazon, microsoft, steam)

Sell software for $25(very low price) bucks and no one would waste time with breaking the law, key gens, viruses, bit torrents and so on. They would make up the profit loss in volume.

I would own copies of all adobe software, even if I did not have a "need" for some.

Worked for many of my friends that had the "Unlimited Trial" of lightroom 3 and now own lightroom 4 after price got cut in half.

Re: Roland,
Adobe could sell any of the products for a low price if they have volume. Take all the pirated copies. Assume that maybe 50% of those would purchase the software if it was $25 bucks. Let any and all camera manufactures bundle the software with cameras. That is a few more million copies. Take computer manufactures, let them give the customer the option to have the software pre-installed for $25 bucks. In the end, adobe will not have 2 mil active licenses, they would have 200 or 300 hundred mil. Also keep in mind third world countries could never afford much for software. Exchange rate would equal 3 months pay. $25 bucks is much more reasonable.

In simple terms. Adobe could sell software for a fair price or people will download it for free. (especially third world countries)

Direct link | Posted on May 6, 2013 at 21:45 UTC

Able to use software online only? How long could you go without a connection before software locks up on you?

Direct link | Posted on May 6, 2013 at 21:35 UTC as 607th comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

Mssimo: My guess is that only the top 25% of pro's can justify the price they demand.

I see you get the point ;) ...three zeros it is!

Direct link | Posted on May 6, 2013 at 20:49 UTC

Adobe should follow the most successful software model of the last 15 years. The "App Store"(apple, android, amazon, microsoft, steam)

Sell software for $25(very low price) bucks and no one would waste time with breaking the law, key gens, viruses, bit torrents and so on. They would make up the profit loss in volume.

I would own copies of all adobe software, even if I did not have a "need" for some.

Worked for many of my friends that had the "Unlimited Trial" of lightroom 3 and now own lightroom 4 after price got cut in half.

Direct link | Posted on May 6, 2013 at 20:47 UTC as 632nd comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

Joseph Broz: I will never pay monthly for software use. Bye bye Adobe.

If the fee was $25 a month for unlimited access to all the titles..I would not have a issue with a monthly fee.

Direct link | Posted on May 6, 2013 at 20:40 UTC
In reply to:

Mssimo: My guess is that only the top 25% of pro's can justify the price they demand.

You must be confusing pro photographers with pro athletes. You were only off by two zeros.

Direct link | Posted on May 6, 2013 at 20:32 UTC
In reply to:

Mssimo: Looking for software to convert DNG back to NEF.

Re: Butler,
I converted all my files to DNG since I had full trust in the standard. I do not see other software vendors embracing it. The safe thing to have done is to keep the original RAW file from the manufacture. This is my concern. The best case scenario would be adobe sell PS at the same price as lightroom ($150) This is the only way Non Pro's or part time pros will continue to use the software. (due to cost)

Direct link | Posted on May 6, 2013 at 19:50 UTC
In reply to:

Mssimo: Looking for software to convert DNG back to NEF.

I have 300K of DNG's from nikon and olympus. I would like to be able to use other software if needed.

Direct link | Posted on May 6, 2013 at 19:46 UTC
Total: 627, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »