Mssimo

Mssimo

Lives in United States Minneapolis, MN, United States
Works as a Software Analyst
Has a website at www.10000photography.com
Joined on Jun 6, 2009

Comments

Total: 875, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

I wonder if they fixed the 24-70's worse in class Chromatic Aberrations.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 4, 2015 at 15:46 UTC as 16th comment
In reply to:

Mssimo: For $750, the 28mm should not have only 7 Aperture blades.

Yes, 24mm, my bad. The 14-24mm has 9 blades, they could have made it 5 or 7 if it did not matter.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 4, 2015 at 14:57 UTC
On Sony reportedly shifting focus to full-frame cameras article (344 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mssimo: I would like to see a 4/3 or oversized square sensor. Makes better use of the image circle. Maybe we will have to wait for global shutters before this happens.

An oversized square sensor where the corners would vignette/not be used. This would be the end of the vertical grip as we know it. It has been difficult to do, due to Optical viewfinders, mirrors, and mechanical shutters. 1:1 format seems to be making a comeback on the internet/mobile world. Maybe mobile devices would be the best place to start with a square sensor.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 4, 2015 at 14:06 UTC

For $750, the 28mm should not have only 7 Aperture blades.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 4, 2015 at 12:35 UTC as 32nd comment | 4 replies
On Sony reportedly shifting focus to full-frame cameras article (344 comments in total)

I would like to see a 4/3 or oversized square sensor. Makes better use of the image circle. Maybe we will have to wait for global shutters before this happens.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 4, 2015 at 03:31 UTC as 35th comment | 4 replies

Canon is always coming out with great new technology....hold on...this is olympus. Never Mind.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 3, 2015 at 20:57 UTC as 22nd comment
On Sony A3000 preview (681 comments in total)

Since this is one of the best selling cameras, are we going to have a full review on it?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 31, 2015 at 19:01 UTC as 12th comment
In reply to:

Mssimo: I would like to see this compared to the Sony A7s. I would not be surprised to see the Sony be much better.

He was saying that micro lenses neglect the "benefit" of larger pixels. Microlenses are old technology and have many issues with wide angle lenses, BSI sensors with less aggressive micro-lenses.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 31, 2015 at 13:51 UTC
In reply to:

Mssimo: I would like to see this compared to the Sony A7s. I would not be surprised to see the Sony be much better.

Bigger pixels with everything else being equal but not everything else is equal. Best sensor technology goes into cel phones. They are the most sophisticated sensors; after a few years, cameras and DSLRs get that technology. Canon has not done much to upgrade their Fab's, they can make bigger pixels but that will yield the best low light image quality from 6 year old technology.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 30, 2015 at 21:58 UTC
In reply to:

Mssimo: I would like to see this compared to the Sony A7s. I would not be surprised to see the Sony be much better.

Still Images. I seen video with the A7s and its quite amazing. I excited to see who uses the camera above and what for. The design seems very nice.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 30, 2015 at 18:07 UTC
In reply to:

Mssimo: I would like to see this compared to the Sony A7s. I would not be surprised to see the Sony be much better.

I should have pointed out I just took a look at ISO 65353 on the A7MKII on photography blog. Looks like ISO 6400 on current canons.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 30, 2015 at 17:59 UTC

I would like to see this compared to the Sony A7s. I would not be surprised to see the Sony be much better.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 30, 2015 at 15:54 UTC as 55th comment | 20 replies
On Adobe Camera Raw 9.1.1 now available article (32 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mssimo: Lightroom Fixes:
Bug Fixes:

-Unable to merge files to HDR. Please note that this only occurred with DNG files taken with a Leica Monochrom camera.
-Enterprise customers were unable to access functionality only available in the Creative Cloud version of Lightroom, such as Dehaze.
-People keywords export when they shouldn’t if “Write Keywords as Lightroom Hierarchy” is selected.
-Preview generation and export was slower in LrCC/Lr6 than Lr5.
-Customers reported that they could not exit full screen after invoking it while spot heal tool is selected.
-D810 NEF Files could not select Adobe Standard Profile.
-Size adjustment bar moving when clicked but the value listed was not updating accordingly.
-Metadata Export setting not working for Track, Square and Grid galleries in the Web Module.
-Collection name changes were not properly reflected in other Lightroom clients (such as mobile or web). This only impacted collections enabled for sync.

-Incorrect metadata timestamp in a Panorama created in Lr.
-Some files in exported batch are Blank with Watermark only.
-Lr was not properly exporting all photos. Please note that this typically only occurred when the customer was running Bridge at the same time as the export.
-Customers reported seeing a “Waiting for connection” message inside Lightroom when Internet is available.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 29, 2015 at 23:25 UTC
On Adobe Camera Raw 9.1.1 now available article (32 comments in total)

Lightroom Fixes:
Bug Fixes:

-Unable to merge files to HDR. Please note that this only occurred with DNG files taken with a Leica Monochrom camera.
-Enterprise customers were unable to access functionality only available in the Creative Cloud version of Lightroom, such as Dehaze.
-People keywords export when they shouldn’t if “Write Keywords as Lightroom Hierarchy” is selected.
-Preview generation and export was slower in LrCC/Lr6 than Lr5.
-Customers reported that they could not exit full screen after invoking it while spot heal tool is selected.
-D810 NEF Files could not select Adobe Standard Profile.
-Size adjustment bar moving when clicked but the value listed was not updating accordingly.
-Metadata Export setting not working for Track, Square and Grid galleries in the Web Module.
-Collection name changes were not properly reflected in other Lightroom clients (such as mobile or web). This only impacted collections enabled for sync.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 29, 2015 at 23:25 UTC as 13th comment | 2 replies
On Adobe Camera Raw 9.1.1 now available article (32 comments in total)

Lensbaby Velvet 56mm f/1.6....Something makes me think anyone with this lens does not care about "corrections" but maybe that is just me.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 29, 2015 at 23:22 UTC as 14th comment

I wonder if they could make speed booster for Medium format lenses onto full frame (sony a7) cameras.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 24, 2015 at 20:46 UTC as 15th comment | 7 replies
In reply to:

Roland Karlsson: A rather big and expensive lens that has a 1.46 x zoom reach. So, if you have a 36 MP FF camera, I assume most people will do just as well with a 24 mm lens and crop to 18 MP.

OK - it is convenient to be able to frame when taking the image.

OK - 36 MP gives you more resolution than 18 MP.

But - I think I would feel rather limited walking around with that zoom.

You heard of sarcasm before?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 22, 2015 at 17:12 UTC
In reply to:

Roland Karlsson: A rather big and expensive lens that has a 1.46 x zoom reach. So, if you have a 36 MP FF camera, I assume most people will do just as well with a 24 mm lens and crop to 18 MP.

OK - it is convenient to be able to frame when taking the image.

OK - 36 MP gives you more resolution than 18 MP.

But - I think I would feel rather limited walking around with that zoom.

This lens is too limited, too bad its not a interchangeable lens.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 22, 2015 at 16:18 UTC
In reply to:

exapixel: How does the 24-35 compare to the 24 f/1.4 and 35 f/1.4? I'm not really interested in compromising image quality to save a little weight.

You are free to look up the other reviews and compare. Not sure if the 24mm if up yet but the 35mm f1.4 art is.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 22, 2015 at 16:16 UTC
In reply to:

exapixel: How does the 24-35 compare to the 24 f/1.4 and 35 f/1.4? I'm not really interested in compromising image quality to save a little weight.

You can check out SLRGEAR.com for full review but as far as I can tell, its on par with prime lenses (at least as far as sharpness)

Direct link | Posted on Jul 22, 2015 at 15:15 UTC
Total: 875, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »