carlosdelbianco

Of course! That's why a Bessa costs US$700 and the cheapest Leica US$5K - a costly rangefinder.

Pretty boring.

Not everyone keeps looking at home screen.

The problem is not failing on developing mirroless cameras, the real problem is that they are failing in developing new lenses and new DSLRs as well - with some exceptions, of course. Good thing...

Tough competitor for Nikon D5100!

Was the pool filled with Perrier? Otherwise, IQ would be compromised.

A quarter of the price, and God (or someone a bit more interested in this comparison) knows how many times smaller sensor.

Not pedantic at all, thanks for clearing this up!

Crop factor of 5,5 compared to 35mm.

I believe it's just a sticker.

A 113 grams camera is cool, but lens could be faster since the sensor is so tiny. It is a f/16 lens in terms of DOF, isn't it?

Focus point is on her left arm, but still...

Unfortunately I can't undo my click to this page...

Good luck on carrying that aluminum iBrick. I'll stick with unbreakable screen and cheap plastic covers.

Great news! I'm willing to buy my first Samyang very soon...

Better buy a Fuji if you plan to show it to your friends.

Whatever... If it was included some people would bitch about paying for something they would just throw in their drawers. Plus, for the 35/50mm people, they already have options out there.

I'm sorry to disappoint you all, but this seems to be the perfect compact camera.

This lens design clearly can't be produced.

As long it isn't priced as Cintiq products, I'll consider it.