Mirrorless Crusader

Mirrorless Crusader

Joined on Aug 27, 2013

Comments

Total: 76, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
On Ghost Town: Shooting in Kolmanskop article (61 comments in total)

These images are average quality. The composition is good but not great, the saturation levels are appropriate, but the white balance is blatantly and arbitrarily warm in many of the images. The lightingwas very poorly done in some of these images, especially #1 with the foreground being desperately needing flash and in some other images the flash was used inappropriately. Overall I would grade this a C+. I certainly could have done better with thousands of dollars worth of gear and enough money to spend all day taking pictures without having to work for a living.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 19, 2014 at 20:50 UTC as 23rd comment | 3 replies

Nothing special; anybody could have taken those pictures if they were rich and insane enough to spend their time biking to every third world country they can find.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 13, 2014 at 00:45 UTC as 36th comment | 2 replies
On Zeiss introduces 'no distortion' Otus 1.4/85mm article (336 comments in total)

Are there any lenses that explode if you drop them or smash them against something?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 9, 2014 at 06:22 UTC as 76th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

StevenE: What about the scores of incredibly lucky photos captured by accident. They were not knowingly planned.
As a photographer, you will have to keep your mouth shut about everything you do, and say only: I planned this shot and it came out exactly as I had intended.
Say nothing else to anyone, ever.

Wrong, all you have to do is take your own damn pictures.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 22, 2014 at 05:17 UTC
In reply to:

cgarrard: DOH- No battery cover door :)

Do I get a prize?

:)

Carl

Actually Carl you get a a big fat demerit for not even reading the article which plainly states that the battery cover is part of the battery.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 14, 2014 at 00:58 UTC

Just one more reason why Oly and Sony >>>> Canikon

Direct link | Posted on Jun 10, 2014 at 02:02 UTC as 20th comment

This is not image theft, you are transforming an image with a watermark into an image without a watermark.

Direct link | Posted on May 29, 2014 at 06:52 UTC as 75th comment | 13 replies
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Review preview (665 comments in total)
In reply to:

BRPWS: After all the bad things you guys wrote about this camera how does it get a silver award? Your review and your award contradict each other.

The reason is because they have to market the camera so they can sell it in Gear Shop (conflict of interests much?) so they give every Canikon camera an award because that's how DPR makes money.Most shoppers never read the reviews and just look at the awards.

Direct link | Posted on May 7, 2014 at 21:14 UTC

$1750 for a kit lens, what a joke

Direct link | Posted on Apr 25, 2014 at 07:26 UTC as 21st comment | 2 replies

OLY OLY OLY!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 26, 2014 at 09:05 UTC as 74th comment

I'VE SAID IT ALL ALONG - OLY WILL NEVER GO OUT OF BUSINESS BECAUSE THEIR REASON TO EXIST ISN'T TO TURN A PROFIT IT'S TO CREATE THE MOST LEGENDARY CAMERAS THE WORLD HAS EVER SEEN! AND CANIKON CAN NEVER COMPETE WITH THAT!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 26, 2014 at 09:01 UTC as 1st comment
On AP cuts ties with Pulitzer-winning photographer article (167 comments in total)

I guess the AP has never heard of something called common sense. Nobody wants to see that camera in the corner. I don't care how many other people were filming the guy and it is immaterial to the significance of the photograph. What is the AP going to do next, fire people for cropping?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 25, 2014 at 03:07 UTC as 29th comment | 2 replies
On Reminder: Vote now for your product of 2013 article (64 comments in total)

Obvioiusly no coincidence that there isn't a single Canikon product that could even win its own category. Of course it doesn't help that Canikon has no idea how to do mirrorless, though it's not long they ever had a ghost of a chance to win that category no matter what they did, considering the E-M1 and A7R,

Direct link | Posted on Jan 18, 2014 at 09:06 UTC as 28th comment | 4 replies
On Reminder: Vote now for your product of 2013 article (64 comments in total)

Oly wins two years in a row. Sony the year before that. I doubt you'll ever see a DSLR win camera of the year ever again.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 18, 2014 at 09:04 UTC as 29th comment | 2 replies
On Wyoming's stunning weather and landscapes in time-lapse article (231 comments in total)

This is nothing special at all. All they did was make a stop-motion video out of long exposures taken at sixty-second intervals so that you see roughly an hour of time elapse per second. Anybody who's rich enough could do that with barely any skill at all.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 15, 2014 at 08:31 UTC as 113th comment | 9 replies

Why does Nikon keep doing this every year?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2014 at 20:16 UTC as 3rd comment | 1 reply

Nothing from CANIKON on this list, because they make garbage products! Oly won last year and is going to win again!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 3, 2014 at 21:27 UTC as 70th comment | 8 replies
On Samsung NX30 First Impressions Review preview (357 comments in total)

Smarter than anything Canikon has ever made, that's for sure.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 3, 2014 at 09:32 UTC as 81st comment
On Best Gear of 2013: The results are in! article (159 comments in total)

LOL Canikon got SHUT OUT of the awards! Sony and Oly are the future of photography! Long live mirrorless, death to DSLRS!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 3, 2014 at 00:04 UTC as 40th comment | 8 replies
On Nikon AF-S Nikkor 58mm f/1.4G review preview (413 comments in total)

A $1700 prime lens and it's not even sharp? What a ripoff. But what else would you expect from Canikon

Direct link | Posted on Dec 31, 2013 at 08:59 UTC as 102nd comment
Total: 76, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »