DStudio

DStudio

Joined on Jan 16, 2012

Comments

Total: 373, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (1706 comments in total)
In reply to:

DStudio: Oh my goodness - maybe I'll finally stop seeing so many action photos with lousy composition! At least one can hope!

Or will we suddenly need to use the "dual" cross-type AF point to get acceptable focus? After all, it now takes 5 in-line razor blades to properly shave my beard in the morning. I used to be such an ignorant simpleton - I actually had the nerve to believe I could shave with only 1 or 2 blades!

If the AF works properly and the high-ISO performance in acceptable, there's nothing to complain about with this camera - Canon has really hit the mark. That is, if people decide to use it properly!

Darko, the Canon 7D was NEVER a general purpose tool designed to satisfy everyone - it was designed to be the best tool for a certain demographic. Why should they change that now? There are plenty of other cameras you can buy to do what you describe, but NO other ~affordable camera satisfies the needs of pro and prosumer action shooters the way this one promises to do.

Contrary to your remark, this camera was designed for those who actually understand the need for the technology it contains. Remember, the problem with ignorance is it never recognizes itself. Perhaps the "old school" people who will buy this camera aren't actually the stupid souls you portray them as.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 16, 2014 at 03:58 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (1706 comments in total)

Oh my goodness - maybe I'll finally stop seeing so many action photos with lousy composition! At least one can hope!

Or will we suddenly need to use the "dual" cross-type AF point to get acceptable focus? After all, it now takes 5 in-line razor blades to properly shave my beard in the morning. I used to be such an ignorant simpleton - I actually had the nerve to believe I could shave with only 1 or 2 blades!

If the AF works properly and the high-ISO performance in acceptable, there's nothing to complain about with this camera - Canon has really hit the mark. That is, if people decide to use it properly!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 20:02 UTC as 225th comment | 3 replies
On Canon announces long-awaited EOS 7D Mark II article (114 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ian SS: It is too little too late, obviously Canon is protecting their higher end cameras, we will see how good it sells. For me I am seriously thinking about leaving Canon.

I hope you know where you're going!

Obviously you either don't have much of a lens collection, or you don't like it that much.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 19:38 UTC

Since monkeys are smart enough to design and build cameras, they should be able to hold a copyright.

But wait ... they're not giving the copyright to anyone - they're just denying it to the obvious rightful owner. This isn't upholding anyone's rights, but merely taking them away. Just a tiny bit more freedom is lost - once again.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 1, 2014 at 19:49 UTC as 6th comment
In reply to:

DStudio: Indonesia, Hmm...

It seems all photos from Indonesia have 100% true and accurate stories about them told by the photographer. Must be something in the air ...

While the ruling by the copyright office sets a ridiculous precedent, in this particular case Mr. Slater may have got exactly what he deserved.

After reading more about the situation, his story sounds plausible. So now I'm going to presume he's being accurate, unless I hear strong evidence to the contrary.

Either way, this ruling by the copyright office still sets a ridiculous precedent, and it must not be allowed to stand.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 27, 2014 at 05:38 UTC

Indonesia, Hmm...

It seems all photos from Indonesia have 100% true and accurate stories about them told by the photographer. Must be something in the air ...

While the ruling by the copyright office sets a ridiculous precedent, in this particular case Mr. Slater may have got exactly what he deserved.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 27, 2014 at 05:06 UTC as 9th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Bokeh Monk: As a Canadian, I find this offensive! I would have thought that the RCMP would have set up a sting operation or something… but now that the the Federal Gov. has told all these Canada Post workers their all out of a job, it's almost what you'd expect to see, workers 'saving for their retirement!

Monk, you do realize the irony in your statement, don't you? The thieves have decided that capitol matters more than people.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 2, 2014 at 18:50 UTC
On Leica T Typ 701 real-world samples gallery updated article (104 comments in total)
In reply to:

DStudio: Are my eyes too tired, or is the late afternoon glare too much on my monitor (even though I closed the semi-opaque shade)?

I came here to compliment Leica. I wanted to use them as an example of excellence, despite pedestrian specifications. But I just don't see it. I can't give them that compliment. In fact, what I have to say is they're not Fuji. And they're certainly not Zeiss Touit. To say Leica is in a class far below is an insult, but unfortunately it's true in this case!

Oh, no, I hope I wake up tomorrow and find it was all a bad dream - that with fresh eyes and soft morning light it's truly a fantastic lens.

I certainly hope so ...

I think you need to start focusing on lenses. Leica has made some of the best, most beautiful image-rendering lenses ever. This won't be counted among them. Such a shame - at this price point I expected *some* kind of special quality (like Zeiss and Fuji deliver), but alas, I don't see it.

JPEG or RAW has nothing to do with it. Neither you nor the camera can simulate what the lens failed to pick up in the first place. This can't be fixed. Lecia has already tried in their JPEG engine, but to no avail.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 17, 2014 at 18:42 UTC
On Leica T Typ 701 real-world samples gallery updated article (104 comments in total)
In reply to:

DStudio: Are my eyes too tired, or is the late afternoon glare too much on my monitor (even though I closed the semi-opaque shade)?

I came here to compliment Leica. I wanted to use them as an example of excellence, despite pedestrian specifications. But I just don't see it. I can't give them that compliment. In fact, what I have to say is they're not Fuji. And they're certainly not Zeiss Touit. To say Leica is in a class far below is an insult, but unfortunately it's true in this case!

Oh, no, I hope I wake up tomorrow and find it was all a bad dream - that with fresh eyes and soft morning light it's truly a fantastic lens.

I certainly hope so ...

You need to learn some things about photography.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 16, 2014 at 18:49 UTC
On Leica T Typ 701 real-world samples gallery updated article (104 comments in total)
In reply to:

DStudio: Are my eyes too tired, or is the late afternoon glare too much on my monitor (even though I closed the semi-opaque shade)?

I came here to compliment Leica. I wanted to use them as an example of excellence, despite pedestrian specifications. But I just don't see it. I can't give them that compliment. In fact, what I have to say is they're not Fuji. And they're certainly not Zeiss Touit. To say Leica is in a class far below is an insult, but unfortunately it's true in this case!

Oh, no, I hope I wake up tomorrow and find it was all a bad dream - that with fresh eyes and soft morning light it's truly a fantastic lens.

I certainly hope so ...

I'm sorry to hear you haven't learned to discern the quality coming out of a camera or lens without RAW files.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 15, 2014 at 22:48 UTC
On Leica T Typ 701 real-world samples gallery updated article (104 comments in total)
In reply to:

DStudio: Are my eyes too tired, or is the late afternoon glare too much on my monitor (even though I closed the semi-opaque shade)?

I came here to compliment Leica. I wanted to use them as an example of excellence, despite pedestrian specifications. But I just don't see it. I can't give them that compliment. In fact, what I have to say is they're not Fuji. And they're certainly not Zeiss Touit. To say Leica is in a class far below is an insult, but unfortunately it's true in this case!

Oh, no, I hope I wake up tomorrow and find it was all a bad dream - that with fresh eyes and soft morning light it's truly a fantastic lens.

I certainly hope so ...

That's the point - I never said I had DNGs.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 10, 2014 at 06:42 UTC
On Canon and Microsoft sign patent agreement post (73 comments in total)
In reply to:

tompabes2: Two turkeys don't make an eagle.

Microsoft is going backwards. Canon is simply stalled - they could end up going either way.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 9, 2014 at 23:56 UTC
On Leica T Typ 701 real-world samples gallery updated article (104 comments in total)
In reply to:

DStudio: Are my eyes too tired, or is the late afternoon glare too much on my monitor (even though I closed the semi-opaque shade)?

I came here to compliment Leica. I wanted to use them as an example of excellence, despite pedestrian specifications. But I just don't see it. I can't give them that compliment. In fact, what I have to say is they're not Fuji. And they're certainly not Zeiss Touit. To say Leica is in a class far below is an insult, but unfortunately it's true in this case!

Oh, no, I hope I wake up tomorrow and find it was all a bad dream - that with fresh eyes and soft morning light it's truly a fantastic lens.

I certainly hope so ...

HowaboutRAW - I have a couple of important questions for you:

- Why didn't you brush your teeth with Crest this morning?
- Why didn't the Dutch team save their last substitution for Krul again today?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 9, 2014 at 23:52 UTC
In reply to:

dpmaxwell: Changing my response to - Noooooooo!

App can't find my Pixma Pro-100, and there is absolutely zero documentation to help with this, as far as I can tell.

Can you print to it with AirPrint from an Apple device? Just curious. My Pro-100 works from AirPrint, but I'll have to try this from the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 which I updated to 4.4.2 last week.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 8, 2014 at 02:59 UTC
On Leica T Typ 701 real-world samples gallery updated article (104 comments in total)

Are my eyes too tired, or is the late afternoon glare too much on my monitor (even though I closed the semi-opaque shade)?

I came here to compliment Leica. I wanted to use them as an example of excellence, despite pedestrian specifications. But I just don't see it. I can't give them that compliment. In fact, what I have to say is they're not Fuji. And they're certainly not Zeiss Touit. To say Leica is in a class far below is an insult, but unfortunately it's true in this case!

Oh, no, I hope I wake up tomorrow and find it was all a bad dream - that with fresh eyes and soft morning light it's truly a fantastic lens.

I certainly hope so ...

Direct link | Posted on Jul 8, 2014 at 01:58 UTC as 14th comment | 11 replies
On Canon and Microsoft sign patent agreement post (73 comments in total)
In reply to:

DStudio: I'm trying to write down all the times a deal with Microsoft has benefited the other company, and I'm still staring at a blank page ...

The only thing that came to my mind later was Microsoft writing Word/Office for the Macintosh from early on.

I'm not sure that was actually a "deal," though. And now Apple would rather have you use Pages anyway.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 3, 2014 at 23:19 UTC
On Canon and Microsoft sign patent agreement post (73 comments in total)

I'm trying to write down all the times a deal with Microsoft has benefited the other company, and I'm still staring at a blank page ...

Direct link | Posted on Jul 3, 2014 at 21:55 UTC as 21st comment | 4 replies
On Nikon D810 Preview preview (1532 comments in total)
In reply to:

reginalddwight: The D810 is a mid-cycle refresh of a class-leading DSLR with respect to IQ and DR.

I tend to agree with the reviewer that it is unlikely going to entice too many D800/E owners like myself to run out and upgrade to Nikon's latest offering, but any incremental refinement is better than none at all.

Naysayers will diss this D800/E successor (e.g. still no WiFi, GPS, or 4k video, etc.). Mirrorless fans will criticize any DSLR regardless.

For those who appreciate the amazing medium format-like IQ the D810's predecessors are capable of producing in the hands of skilled photographers, I view the tiny improvements in this D810 as welcome additions--however "unexciting" they may be.

Without Medium Format lenses I think you're only getting an MF-like number of pixels, not MF-like IQ.

But as to the rest of your post, I agree that this camera will prove to be a worthwhile improvement.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 26, 2014 at 07:09 UTC
On Nikon D810 Preview preview (1532 comments in total)
In reply to:

DStudio: Love your headline! It's such a statement on the current state of the industry.

This isn't a knock on the camera. It looks like a worthwhile update from Nikon. But it may not be a worthwhile upgrade for current (D800/E) owners.

Nevertheless, don't underestimate the power of refinement. Cameras like the D810 can actually end up being the most pleasant to own.

Martin, I think you're right. This is generally good for photographers, but challenging for manufacturers who now have to deal with largely saturated markets where sales numbers are on a downswing.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 26, 2014 at 06:56 UTC
On Nikon D810 Preview preview (1532 comments in total)
In reply to:

Timbukto: "When we tested the D800 and D800E we found that we had to go to great lengths to avoid mirror and shutter-induced vibration from reducing resolution at some shutter speeds. This is par for the course with such a high-resolution camera, and we've worked through the same issues on other DSLRs and interchangeable lens cameras (like the Sony A7R) since then."

Is this the first time we've heard about this? How come it seems like companies need to make improvements before issues are revealed...I feel like it should be the other way around, journalism should be revealing issues to be fixed beforehand. What are the great lengths needed to avoid mirror slap and shutter shake anyhow, would it be useful to know for anyone wanting to extract the most out of their pics? Forgive me if I you guys already went to great lengths explaining, perhaps I missed it.

If DPR would talk more about specific ways of solving the problem that would be useful.

Suggesting that these are "issues" (which in support parlance is a codeword for a major bug) which are only now being "revealed" due to DPR's irresponsible "journalism" is just plain silly.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 26, 2014 at 06:47 UTC
Total: 373, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »