Hossein Zaka

Joined on Dec 26, 2011

Comments

Total: 3, showing: 1 – 3
In reply to:

Serious Sam: The problem I see with QX product line is the price. In Australia RX100 II can be have for A$512 while the QX100 cost A$410. For the extra 100 bucks you got a full camera body.

News goes that the QX1 is going for US$400. To be fair I can get a A5100 body with that price and I can still shoot remote with my phone.

The only thing that is good with a QX is as I said no one has a clue what you are doing hence it is a very stealthy street shooting platform. Having said that last time I play with it the link to the phone is not very stable and interface is quite laggy.

Thanks, good comment! and calculation!

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2014 at 10:08 UTC
On article Nikon introduces CoolPix AW100 rugged compact camera (39 comments in total)
In reply to:

hajagosb: Why can't they release somthing like this with a much faster lens?

Whats your expectation from this kinda rough & rugged camera!?

5mm-140mm f2.8!?
or
24 f1.4!?

its hard in optics and catching the lights...!

Link | Posted on Jun 24, 2012 at 11:05 UTC
On article Nikon introduces CoolPix AW100 rugged compact camera (39 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jefftan: "AW100 helps to create blur free images with the use of Nikon's Vibration Reduction (VR) to minimize camera shake "

This mean no optical image stabilization? $380 just cracy

I perhaps it has a optical anti Vibration!

And you most compare it with TS4! Not the old one !

Link | Posted on Jun 24, 2012 at 10:59 UTC
Total: 3, showing: 1 – 3