SnapHappy32

SnapHappy32

Joined on Jan 23, 2012

Comments

Total: 131, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows article (1396 comments in total)
In reply to:

Zvonko: actually looks like one of Thom Hogans old predictions coming true.

Ha!

I predict a new Sony mount later this year.
I predict 16 more Ti iterations of the same camera sensor from Canon.
I predict poor QC and service from Nikon.
I predict that Pentaxians will insist on their limited lenses outperforming the Otus.

Camera people and companies are predictable.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 4, 2013 at 17:13 UTC
On Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows article (1396 comments in total)
In reply to:

Digitall: Almost the same specs as D610, but almost twice the price, ok. The retro style is expensive.
But it's a good marketing move from Nikon. "The gods must be crazy" Part II.

The sensor is supposedly the same as the D4. For half the price.

And almost twice the (intro) price of the D610?

Wish the Gods could teach you math.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 4, 2013 at 16:58 UTC
On Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows article (1396 comments in total)
In reply to:

Archiver: 1226 comments as of this posting. This has to be a record for DPReview announcements, even bigger than the Adobe Creative Clod announcement. It shows how much interest and opinion there is for a camera of this nature.

Plastek!

Throw in the word PRO when speakning of the EM1. Generously. I've yet to read a post where Its proponents havent used that very word at least 3-4 times.

Keep it that way - keep the peace ;-)

I've seen posters insist on comparing it to a D4 with the 24-70. I own an EM5. My mostly used camera. But even my old d7000 beats it handily.

Fanatism sucks which-ever-way you put it. Glad Im not the only one annoyed by this behaviour.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 4, 2013 at 16:40 UTC
On Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows article (1396 comments in total)
In reply to:

babalu: If that 1.8 G had an aperture setting ring... sadly, no.

There is a cheap 1.8D 50mm if you must.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 4, 2013 at 16:16 UTC
On Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows article (1396 comments in total)
In reply to:

SnapHappy32: Just saw the images on NR.

Having held of buying a FF twice during the last year - this is it.
This is the one.

I shoot events a lot (indoor). I have the savings (if the 3.000 k.USD price is correct) in place. I just need to pair this with the new Noct if it indeed has the D4 sensor.

This is it. I've never been this excited about a camera release. I don't care for its faux-retro looks or size. But I've never been this ready to preorder anything.

How rude of me. Thanks for the link Marike - looks great!

Direct link | Posted on Nov 4, 2013 at 15:32 UTC
On Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows article (1396 comments in total)
In reply to:

SnapHappy32: Just saw the images on NR.

Having held of buying a FF twice during the last year - this is it.
This is the one.

I shoot events a lot (indoor). I have the savings (if the 3.000 k.USD price is correct) in place. I just need to pair this with the new Noct if it indeed has the D4 sensor.

This is it. I've never been this excited about a camera release. I don't care for its faux-retro looks or size. But I've never been this ready to preorder anything.

I saw Fro's comparisons on twitter. The new Noct looks simply wonderful.

I'm amazed at what just became available. Excellent optical performance wide open at 1,4 and great ISO-performance up to and including 6.400 for less than a D4. I'm in Nirvana for my purposes.

Arh btw. I love Karma. Some D'bags were asking up to 4-5000 USD on ebay for the 1.2. Good luck with that!

Then again it might surge as puritans will look for the 1.2 aperture..

Direct link | Posted on Nov 4, 2013 at 14:55 UTC
On Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows article (1396 comments in total)

Just saw the images on NR.

Having held of buying a FF twice during the last year - this is it.
This is the one.

I shoot events a lot (indoor). I have the savings (if the 3.000 k.USD price is correct) in place. I just need to pair this with the new Noct if it indeed has the D4 sensor.

This is it. I've never been this excited about a camera release. I don't care for its faux-retro looks or size. But I've never been this ready to preorder anything.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 4, 2013 at 14:31 UTC as 83rd comment | 6 replies
On PPE 2013: Hands-on with Panasonic's newest cameras article (37 comments in total)
In reply to:

John McCormack: I don't get the GM1 - for an amateur at least. Yes, it's small with a big sensor, but the kit lens is slow and short in reach. There's no hot shoe. To get a faster lens jumps the price up to or over $1,000, I think. Nice for a professional's second camera. I'll stick to the 1/1.7 cameras until or unless the price on the GM1 falls in the next six months.

I'm an amateur and I sincerely "get it" - if you already own M43 lenses. Paired with an Oly 45 mm & Panny 25 mm you have one hell of an event snapper, which allows you to stay a part of the event ;-) as opposed to the guy lugging gear.

I'm getting one in about 6 months time. The price should be lower by then.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 28, 2013 at 17:03 UTC
On Sony DSC-RX10 preview (725 comments in total)
In reply to:

Yehuda_: Here's an interesting comparison:

Panasonic G5 goes for ~300$ and weighs 392 grams (w/ battery+card)
Panasonic 12-35 F2.8 goes for ~1000$ and weighs 305 grams.

So total price is ~1300$ and total weight is 692 grams.
The height of the G5 is slightly less than a sony and it's slightly narrower while the length from the back of the EVF to the edge of the 12-35 when mounted is just over 13cm - so both kits are almost identical in size and the G5+12-35 weighs less (697 grams vs. 813 grams for the Sony RX10).

In short - both combos cost roughly the same and the bulk is very similar though the Sony is definitely heavier.

The Sony has a more useful focal length and better EVF and is better weather sealed. The G5 has probably much better IQ with the 12-35, (probably) faster AF, a fully articulating screen etc. etc.

Which of the 2 would you prefer (I know my preference - not the Sony...)?

The OP is not using common sense. He dimisses/ignores the very point of this camera - the focal length choices. 24-200 mm in a small package, precluding the use of larger sensors.

Add the Panny 35-100 to the G5 setup to cover the same aov - then let's talk cost and weigth.

This camera trades in IQ for size. That's the POINT

Direct link | Posted on Oct 24, 2013 at 16:33 UTC

Fuji. Who knew that the ackward girl in class would be the one to turn your head in the end.

Bravo - although some of the improvements were long overdue. Af point selection was a b....

Direct link | Posted on Oct 19, 2013 at 10:47 UTC as 45th comment
On Sony Alpha A7 / A7R preview (2372 comments in total)
In reply to:

HubertChen: The FE lens mount is brilliant, and compliments to Sony.

Sony has 3 lens mounts now: Alpha, E and FE. And this camera can use them all. With all automatic couplings. Great backwards compatibility and yet most modern features in one lens mount. Sony needs to be applauded to allow Sony users to reuse their lenses instead of forcing them to re-buy in a different mount. Very commendable.

As for the future it will be very interesting to see how this plays out. Will Sony over time consolidate the lenses to the FE / E mount? E for APSC and FE for FF? And you can mix and match to your hearts content. Use FF lens on APSC Sensor and APSC lens on FF sensor? And whenever you come across legacy alpha glass, you use an adapter.

I am curious to see if this is the end of the DSLR for Sony? Personally, I already do not miss the OVF any more :-)

Hubert. I'm all for positivity. But introducing adapters to combat different flange distances is a double-edged sword. Robert Cicala wrote an interesting article about the very small tolerances needed to align a lens and sensor for peak performance.

An alternative suggestion is to build in the adapters in the actual body. That'll give you some ugly designs - but better performance.

I'm not sure A-lens owners will get the same performance on this body compared to an a99. I might be wrong. It simply annoys me when product strategies are more marketing driven than anything else.

As it stands in 2013, you still need to pair a lens with its original mount to get the best possible performance. Thats a shame. A-mount lenses are expensive. I'd hold on to an a99 as long as possible.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 19, 2013 at 10:24 UTC
On Sony Alpha A7 / A7R preview (2372 comments in total)
In reply to:

Bastian Junker: Fuji Xpro 2 fullframe - yes, please.....please:-)

Leica glass (save S) does not autofocus, capiche?

Everything is a trade off.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 17, 2013 at 15:39 UTC
In reply to:

shutterdragon: I paid $1,700 for a brand new Noct f1.2 about 20 years ago when it was still in production. Been very happy with the results and I'm glad I made the decision to buy this lens since nothing else comes close to what Noct is designed to excel at. $1,700 was as much as my monthly salary at the time, by the way. If this new 58mm can perform as well as Noct, it's a great buy actually.

Good to hear that you've kept it. I've been looking at it enviously for a long time. But as mentioned elsewhere people are charging handsome sums of money for on eBay.

How do you rate it on DX bodies?

I'm seriously considering it for concerts and events paired with a d7100.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 17, 2013 at 15:17 UTC
In reply to:

samhain: Leica just released an official statment reguarding this lens 'invoking the spirit of Noctilux':

"Aw, isn't that cute".

Canon couldn't be reached for comment but was reported as simply 'smiling' after learning of the aperture.
:D

Jokes aside- if I shot with Nikon, I'd probably get it.
(assuming its as good as the description/price indicates).

I'm guessing they meant the 58 mm Nikon Noct, which sells for between 3-4 k on ebay. If this has the same superb coma free images Nikonians can save a handsome sum of money, for a minor aperture penalty.

I'm very interested. Think night time urban shots.

Good news. There seems to be something inherently tricky about the 50 mm focal length when it comes to coma. Zeiss' latest also seems to imply this. Anyone with some knowledge on this matter?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 17, 2013 at 06:09 UTC
On Fujifilm XF 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 R LM OIS review preview (140 comments in total)
In reply to:

GabrielZ: 83% score - why only a silver award and not gold? The XF 14mm f2.8 got the same score and was awarded gold!

In a quantum state there are probabilities. 99% is larger than 1% probability of a cerhtain state.

Government? Nah - the business sector pays more :-)

Direct link | Posted on Sep 27, 2013 at 14:27 UTC
On Fujifilm XF 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 R LM OIS review preview (140 comments in total)
In reply to:

Al Valentino: As an owner of this lens I can say the IQ is fantastic. I did a few quick tripod tests stopped down against my old Nikon 70-200 VR I and they tied. Shortly after sold the Nikon lens and began selling off the rest of my Nikon gear. I use Capture One 7 Express when I shoot RAW but jpegs are often good enough.

Tandua. I wouldn't discount the 70-300 so easily. Its AF performance seems to be miles ahead of this one. But you are right about the IQ. Just.... Ok.

I'll reserve judgement for when I've seen other samples. This seems off. Fuji are great at making lenses. This is just plain weird...

Direct link | Posted on Sep 25, 2013 at 19:08 UTC
On Fujifilm XF 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 R LM OIS review preview (140 comments in total)
In reply to:

GabrielZ: 83% score - why only a silver award and not gold? The XF 14mm f2.8 got the same score and was awarded gold!

Dp needs another scale - or start beeing true to the logic of numbers.

100% should mean the perfect camera. 0% should mean no camera. Everything inbetween adheres to the logic of numbers everywhere else in the real world. Higher is more or better. There is no arguing that I'd prefer a raise of 20% more than 3%. Reverse for costs.

Drop the percentages - just stick to the gold, silver, bronze etc.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 25, 2013 at 19:01 UTC

Cant reply to the post I wanted...

Ddd - rrr. Your and his story gave me a big smile on an otherwise hectic and rainy day.

I see what he saw. I understand. He is communicating with me.
Thats very comforting - the kid has a way out of a very solitary existance.
The tragedy is that he might never know it himself.
Just hope (and believe) that he's having a blast doing it.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 9, 2013 at 15:56 UTC as 12th comment
On Olympus stems losses but PEN sales disappoint article (233 comments in total)
In reply to:

mediasorcerer: Olympus will be fine, the next omd will put them in a better position soon enough.
Part of me hopes they will create a csc with ff sensor at some stage of the game, or fixed zoom ff rangefinder style, it's the next logical step, and an area they are not covering, that badly needs some competition.
hey, im allowed to dream.

Dottore - if the rumours of a hybrid mount are true then the next om-d will outsell the current one.. Hardly slightly updated..

E-5 owners will buy 3-4 each :-)

FF?? C'mon - care to guess what happens with lens sizes?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 11, 2013 at 15:54 UTC
On Olympus stems losses but PEN sales disappoint article (233 comments in total)

Then again .. 2012 is a very hard year to follow..
Seems that all major manufacturers released very attractive and innovative cameras...

Cant speak for everyone else, but 2012 was the year of the om-d for me. Many lenses and accessories later, I'm both satisfied.. And cash strapped..
I dont need to splurge out again this year... Point is - I guess many of us are still just enjoying our 2012 models.. ?

As for financial analysts... They may simply not understand the customers buying criterias or the market in terms of available product mix. We had a ton of models last year that surpassed previous products by a substantial margin.

Take the Nikonian with full frame lust but being short of the cash to buy a DX(x). He might have wished for his D700 to have a better MP count. He might have wished for 20-24. He got 36. Thats good enough for many years to come.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 10, 2013 at 10:44 UTC as 29th comment
Total: 131, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »